首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart Cook, in which he suggested that the best way of avo
In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart Cook, in which he suggested that the best way of avo
admin
2017-04-20
74
问题
In last week’s Tribune, there was an interesting letter from Mr. J. Stewart Cook, in which he suggested that the best way of avoiding the danger of a "scientific hierarchy" would be to see to it that every member of the general public was, as far as possible, scientifically educated. At the same time, scientists should be brought out of their isolation and encouraged to take a greater part in politics and administration.
As a general statement, I think most of us would agree with this, but I notice that, as usual, Mr. Cook does not define science, and merely implies in passing that it means certain exact sciences whose experiments can be made under laboratory conditions. Thus, adult education tends "to neglect scientific studies in favor of literary, economic and social subjects", economics and sociology not being regarded as branches of science, apparently. This point is of great importance. For the word science is at present used in at least two meanings, but the whole question of scientific education is obscured by the current tendency to dodge from one meaning to the other.
Science is generally taken as meaning either (a) the exact sciences, such as chemistry, physics, etc., or (b) a method of thought which obtains verifiable results by reasoning logically from observed fact.
If you ask any scientist, or indeed almost any educated person, "What is science?" you are likely to get an answer approximating to (b). In everyday life, however, both in speaking and in writing, when people say "science" they mean (a). Science means something that happens in a laboratory: test-tubes, balances, Bunsen burners, microscopes. A biologist, an astronomer, perhaps a psychologist or a mathematician, is described as a "man of science": no one would think of applying this term to a statesman, a poet, a journalist or even a philosopher. And those who tell us that the young must be scientifically educated mean, almost invariably, that they should be taught more about radioactivity, or the stars, or the physiology of their own bodies, rather than that they should be taught to think more exactly.
This confusion of meaning, which is partly deliberate, has in it a great danger. Implied in the demand for more scientific education is the claim that if one has been scientifically trained one’s approach to all subjects will be more intelligent than if one had had no such training. A scientist’s political opinions, it is assumed, his opinions on sociological questions, on morals, on philosophy, perhaps even on the arts, will be more valuable than those of a layman. But a" scientist", as we have just seen, means in practice a specialist in one of the exact sciences. It follows that a chemist or physicist, as such, is politically more intelligent than a poet or a lawyer. And, in fact, there are already millions of people who do believe this.
But is it really true that a "scientist", in this narrower sense, is any likelier than other people to approach non-scientific problems in an objective way? There is not much reason for thinking so. Take one simple test—the ability to withstand nationalism. It is often loosely said that "Science is international", but in practice the scientific workers of all countries line up behind their own governments with fewer scruples than are felt by the writers and the artists. The German scientific community, as a whole, made no resistance to Hitler. There were plenty of gifted men to do the necessary research on such things as synthetic oil, jet planes, rocket projectiles and the atomic bomb.
On the other hand, what happened to German literature when the Nazis came to power? I believe no exhaustive lists have been published, but I imagine that the number of German scientists—Jew apart—who voluntarily exiled themselves or were persecuted by the regime was much smaller than the number of writers and journalists. More sinister than this, a number of German scientists swallowed the monstrosity of "racial science".
But does this mean that the general public should not be more scientifically educated? On the contrary! All it means is that scientific education for the masses will do little good, and probably a lot of harm, if it simply boils down to more physics, more chemistry, more biology, etc. to the detriment of literature and history. Its probable effect on the average human being would be to narrow the range of his thoughts and make him more than ever contemptuous of such knowledge as he did not possess; and his political reactions would probably be somewhat less intelligent than those of an illiterate peasant who retained a few historical memories and a fairly sound aesthetic sense.
Clearly, scientific education ought to mean the implanting of a rational, skeptical, experimental habit of mind. It ought to mean acquiring a method—a method that can be used on any problem that one meets—and not simply piling up a lot of facts. Put it in those words, and the apologist of scientific education will usually agree. Press him further, ask him to particularize, and somehow it always turns out that scientific education means more attention to the exact sciences, in other words—more facts. The idea that science means a way of looking at the world, and not simply a body of knowledge, is in practice strongly resisted. I think sheer professional jealousy is part of the reason for this.
Which of the following is INCORRECT as regards scientists?
选项
A、Many people assume that scientists can do well in handling political affairs.
B、German scientists did research on atomic bombs.
C、Generally people don’t regard an economist as a scientist.
D、Scientists prefer laboratory work to administration.
答案
D
解析
细节题。第五段最后指出,那么接下去的推论就是,一个化学家或物理学家,或者其他类似的科学家在政治上要比诗人或律师更有智慧。事实上已经有数以百万计的人对此深信不疑,故[A]符合文意。第六段最后一句指出,始终有许多才俊之士在对合成油料、喷气飞机、火箭和原子弹之类做必要的研究,故[B]符合文意;第二段第二句指出,成人教育往往会“忽视那些有利于文学、经济学和社会学科的研究”,很显然,经济学和社会学没有被看作科学的分支,故[C]符合文意。只有[D]文中没有提及,故为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/etzK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Educationistheprocessoflearningandknowing,whichisnotrestrictedtoourschooltext-books.Itisaholisticprocessan
Thedistinctionbetween______and______isthebestknowncontributionofthePragueSchooltoPhonology.
Necessarymeditationsontheactual,includingthemeanbread-and-cheesequestion,dissipatedthephantasmalforawhile,andco
Unlikeanearthquake,ademographicdisasterdoesnotstrikewithoutwarning.Japan’spopulationof127mispredictedtofallto
EnglishBusinessLetterFormatI.Demandsofstationery—thefirstpageiswithaletterhead—otherpagesareof【B1】______and
Whoset(s)thepublicschoolcalendars?
CableTVhasexperiencedtremendousgrowthasanadvertisingmediumbecauseithassomeimportantadvantages.Aprimaryoneis
PASSAGEFOURWhatcanwelearnfromtheplanningdocumentPlaNYC?
PASSAGETHREEAccordingtoFransdeWaal,wheredoesmoralitycomefrom?
随机试题
下面对某教师作文评议尝试的评析,错误的一项是()。某位教师在作文改评中进行了名为“给自己的作文找读者”的尝试:学生完成作文之后,教师不是当堂收上来,而是让学生保留两天,要求学生主动将自己的作文拿给同学写评语(评语内容不限,字数不限),两天后作文收
尿试带法测定球蛋白的敏感性为测定清蛋白的
用铁剂治疗营养性缺铁性贫血时.为帮助铁剂吸收.宜同时口服
小白菜在烹调过程中最易损失的营养素为
(2008年案例分析第66—70题)2002年6月6日,甲与乙签订了一份开发用于特种设备的变频装置的技术合同,双方约定乙在合同生效后的3个月内将该变频装置的图纸一份及样品一套送交甲,专利权归甲所有,甲支付乙开发费用100万元。2002年8月,甲取得该变频装
纳税人在停业期间发生纳税义务的,应当按照税收法律、行政法规的规定申报缴纳税款。()
汇兑的撤销,是指汇款人对汇出银行()的款项,向汇出银行申请撤销的行为。
甲省教育厅的王某出国考察回国途中,在乙省丙海关例行检查时,被查出携带违禁光盘三张和书籍两本,海关遂对王某处以没收全部光盘和书籍并罚款200元的处罚。其后,王某又被所在单位给予记过的行政处分。根据上述资料,回答下列问题:如果王某申请行政复议,对
以习近平总书记为核心的党中央根据新的形势任务和党内状况。突出强调了政治纪律和政治规矩问题。以下属于遵守政治纪律和政治规矩要求的表述是()
A、Doapart-timejob.B、Makeuseofthelibrary.C、Borrowfromotherstudents.D、Cutherlivingexpense.B
最新回复
(
0
)