首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Subway If anything truly revolutionized the way New Yorkers live, work and play, it’s the subway. On any given weekday, 4.5
Subway If anything truly revolutionized the way New Yorkers live, work and play, it’s the subway. On any given weekday, 4.5
admin
2010-04-12
54
问题
Subway
If anything truly revolutionized the way New Yorkers live, work and play, it’s the subway. On any given weekday, 4.5 million people travel on the 6,400 cars that run along 722 miles of track beneath the city’s five teeming (热闹的) boroughs. For all their complaints about it-the dirt! The crowding! The noise!—the subway remains nothing short of the miracle it was when the subway opened in 1904.
What was the original impetus behind developing the subway?
Existence on these streets, with the teeming masses, could not be borne any longer. Many areas were very diseased, new immigrants were huddled together. What was needed was the development of the outer boroughs to really occupy the workers, and the people needed to fill the jobs and facilities and services that Manhattan always had.
Was there any resistance to building it?
New York City had all the difficulties that we have today: NIMBY-ism existed even then. We had Tammany Hall we had corruption. But we also had a lot of very high-minded New Yorkers, people who really felt that this city must grow and had the best interests of the city at heart. At the same time electricity was invented. Being a very, very new science it was being very closely adapted for street railways. Then you have this invention of multiple-unit train control, where whole series of cars can run at the same time while piloted by the first-car motorman. That was an incredible thing. Now they had the tools in which they could run underground and not worry about soot ventilation(通风). Then of course you have to pick the route. Just like today, everybody wants it to go somewhere else. It’s very interesting to note that the first subway route was a public-private venture, where the city owned the subway and put up the money, some $50 million, which at the time was astronomical(庞大的).
Is the initial economic impact at all quantifiable?
Around 1910, before the subway started going to Brooklyn it was nowhere near a million in population. Within ab6ut 10 years of the opening of the subway systems there, the population goes beyond a million. If you look at the 1930s when it went out to Flushing, there’s nothing out there. It’s like prairie; it’s like going out to Montana. If you look at it after the war, there’s not one lot left. Basically, we built an empire based on public transit. This does not happen with the automobile. We did not see this with the maze of highway systems that went up. What we did see was the deterioration of the center core city to the growth of the suburbs. One of the things about a subway car, there’s from 40 to 150 people in this ear. I am now going to put every one of them in an automobile: You would have a line of automobiles that would stretch four to five blocks in length. But they all fit in one subway car, they all fit in one bus.
Is subway central to the city even today?
Everything the city of New York depends on the growth of the subway system. About three quarters of people took the train to work today. The idea of public transit is essential, sensible and the key to a healthy city. The ability New York City had on the opening of the subway is that they could physically move 30,000 people from 125th Street to Wall Street in less than 15 minutes. That’s incredible. No one was able to do that. When the subway system was able to pull this kind of volume, people said "You know, I think I am going to live in the Bronx. I think I am going to live in upper Manhattan-96th Street doesn’t look so far away when you think of it." It was a massive success, it was money spent in the right place. I would say that that $50 million probably brought the tune of trillions of dollars and are still producing trillions of dollars to this day.
Why did people think the subway was an aesthetic wonder?
More than a technological feat, the subway was also an aesthetic wonder. They got the idea, really, from Budapest. You can’t take the loop around anymore and see City Hall Station, which was probably the most artistic achievement of any of the stations with vaulted (拱状的) arches, a lighted glass ceiling. The subway museum wanted to make it part of their museum exhibit, and really should, but can’t because of the terrorist threats and its location so close to the foot of City Hall—you can come out of the staircases and 20 feet later walk right up the steps of City Hall.
What is New York about if it isn’t tearing down and rebuilding?
New York City in the 1830s and 1850s, you couldn’t ever live anywhere, it was always being torn down. Your home was being torn down for a store, a business, a building, a shop, and it kept marching and marching on. And it’s still marching today. New York is still changing. Today we’re looking at the West Side with great avarice. It’s the new growth place. New York City has a real riotous past of tearing down everything. We do not have any of the elevated lines left in Manhattan. But the original subway route is still very much intact.
Why is subway part of the culture?
The subway system is one of the great cultural factors. The subway system does two major important things that are still begging to be understood on the 100(上标)th anniversary. One is that public transit does do a great deal to really make the urban experience exciting. People can move about freely. The city. was your huckleberry. This is a civilizing thing. It gets you to meet new people. You have to talk--the train stops, it doesn’t move, you look at him, she looks at you, what’s going on? And you start talking. As a person who lived most of my life in the city of New York, New Yorkers are the most helpful, the most generous, the most giving. And no one sees this more than when you ride the subway and say, "Can you tell me how to get to 14th Street?" Every New Yorker is their own personal authority on the transit system and the best way to get to DeKalh Avenue and the best way to get to Park Place. You are asking them for their brilliance and expertise.
New York City in the 1830s and 1850s, you couldn’t ever live anywhere, it was always being______.
选项
答案
torn down.
解析
文章在“What is New York about if it isn’t tearing down and rebuilding?”一段中说道:“New York City in the 1830s and 1850s,you couldn’t ever live anywhere,it was always being torn down.”从而得出答案为:torn down。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ewj7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Ilovetravelingbytrain.Fast【B1】______,slowlocaltrainswhichstopateverystation,【B2】______trainstakingbusinessmen
Ilovetravelingbytrain.Fast【B1】______,slowlocaltrainswhichstopateverystation,【B2】______trainstakingbusinessmen
A、Overtheradio.B、Atadoctor’soffice.C、Attheman’shouse.D、Atadrugstore.A信息明示题,对话开头女士就说welcometo"Advice"radioprog
Wehavespokenofmarriageasaformalcontract.Itshouldbenoted,however,thatthiscontractdoesnot【S1】______thesamefor
MoreandmoreAmericansarereadingtheirowncreditreport.Creditreportsare【B1】______bylenderstodecidehowrriskyitwo
Scientistshavedevelopedanewcancerdrug.Sofar,theyhavetesteditonlyon【B1】______animals.Thedrugisdesignedto【B2
Scientistshavedevelopedanewcancerdrug.Sofar,theyhavetesteditonlyon【B1】______animals.Thedrugisdesignedto【B2
A、Apostoffice.B、Abookstore.C、Adepartmentstore.D、Adrugstore.B根据选项,推测对话的内容与地点相关,对话中出现了书店的名字,并且听见男子在问路,可见男子在寻找一家书店,因此答案是
Whetherleadersarebornormadehasbeenasubjectofintensedebatealmostsincethebeginningoftime.But,withcurrentmana
____________(众所周知),abalanceddietandexercisekeeponefitandhealthy.
随机试题
清末主张“平恕”为审断之本的思想家是
清算会计核算的基本前提包括【】
一奶牛,颈部食管梗阻,保守治疗无效,欲对其进行手术治疗,先对其进行麻醉。该麻醉药的最适浓度为
男,75岁,胃癌根治术后7天,剧烈咳嗽时,突然出现切口疼痛,并流出少量淡红色液体。病人最可能是出现了
根据《行政复议法》的有关规定,当事人认为具体行政行为侵犯其合法权益的,可以自知道该具体行政行为之日起()日内提出行政复议申请。
在提出首次公开发行股票申请前,应按证监会的规定对辅导对象进行辅导。辅导对象的具体范围是拟上市公司的()。
下面是某求助者的SCL-90测验结果:总分:258阴性项目分:36通过计算,该求助者的阳性项目均分约为()
住房作为一种特殊商品,具有准公共产品的属性。为追求更多的利润,住房市场天然地向高档化、大窗体底部户型方向发展。这就需要政府的有形之手去完善住房保障制度,保证那些不能通过市场满足住房需求的低收入者享受基本的居住权。这段话主要强调的意思是()。
下列关于贷款诈骗罪的说法,正确的有()。
(2017年)设X1,X2,…,Xn(n≥2)为来自总体N(μ,1)的简单随机样本,记Xi,则下列结论中不正确的是()
最新回复
(
0
)