首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
36
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
The author believes that______.
选项
A、many teachers are opposed to the idea of being evaluated by the students
B、students are opposed to the idea of evaluating the teachers on their own
C、students fear that they are likely to be criticized by their teachers if they are to give their assessments
D、many teachers fear that they are likely to criticize the students who have given their assessments
答案
A
解析
参考文章第二段,其中用了两个argue,表明作者认为许多教师是反对由学生评判自己的教课水平的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/f6iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Whenyoufly,flywithBelAir.PeoplewhotravelalotflywithBelAir,becausetheyknowtheywillgetwhattheywant.
WhatdowemeanbyaperfectEnglishpronunciation?InonesensethereareasmanydifferentkindsofEnglishastherearespeak
CalifornianMichaelSchwabesaidgoodbyetothegaspumptwoyearsago.Heleasedanelectriccar.Schwabesayshegetsmoreout
Eversincehumanshaveliveontheearth,theyhavemadeuseofvariousformsofcommunication.Generally,thisexpressionofth
HowtoSelectaHomeComputerComputersareveryversatile.Theycandomanythingssuchasteaching,playinggames,orhelp
HowtoSelectaHomeComputerComputersareveryversatile.Theycandomanythingssuchasteaching,playinggames,orhelp
Theyear2000willbringbigchangesincommunication.Cellphoneswillbesmallenoughtocarryinyourpocket.Videophoneswil
Ifyouarelikemostpeople,yourintelligencevariesfromseasontoseason.Youareprobablyalotsharperinthespringthany
Agreenhouseisabuildingmadeofglasswhichisusedforkeepingplantswarmwhentheoutsidetemperatureishow.Inasimilar
UncleSamisatall,thinman.He’saneldermanwithwhitehairandawhitebeard.Heoftenwearsatallhat,abowtie,andth
随机试题
关于药物制剂溶出度检查,下列说法中不正确的是
组织处于绝对不应期,其兴奋性
下列何种非参统计方法用于随机区组设计的资料
砂仁的功效是
蛛网膜下腔出血常见的病因是()。
优先股是一种介于股本资金与负债之间的融资方式,其特点有()。
建设项目或单项工程全部建筑安装工程建设期在12个月以内,或者工程承包合同价值在100万元以下的,可以实行工程价款每月月中预支,最后的结算方法是( )。
下列属于账实核对的内容的是( )。
从运输业发展的历史和现状看,各种运输方式在运输生产过程ffl存在着相互竞争、优势互补的要求。()
西部某贫困县10余位学龄儿童、少年的家长,因不听乡村干部和学校领导、教师的再三劝导,既不送无故休学的子女返校,又不执行政府有关的处罚决定。该县人民法院根据乡政府申请,对这些家长实施了处罚并强制执行。在过去十几年里全国出现不少义务教育阶段学生家长因不尽法定义
最新回复
(
0
)