首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
61
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
The author believes that______.
选项
A、many teachers are opposed to the idea of being evaluated by the students
B、students are opposed to the idea of evaluating the teachers on their own
C、students fear that they are likely to be criticized by their teachers if they are to give their assessments
D、many teachers fear that they are likely to criticize the students who have given their assessments
答案
A
解析
参考文章第二段,其中用了两个argue,表明作者认为许多教师是反对由学生评判自己的教课水平的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/f6iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
SupposeyouworkinabigfirmandfindEnglishveryimportantforyourjobbecauseyouoftendealwithforeignbusinessmen.Now
Whenyoufly,flywithBelAir.PeoplewhotravelalotflywithBelAir,becausetheyknowtheywillgetwhattheywant.
WhatdowemeanbyaperfectEnglishpronunciation?InonesensethereareasmanydifferentkindsofEnglishastherearespeak
Georgedid______thananyoneelse.
Eversincehumanshaveliveontheearth,theyhavemadeuseofvariousformsofcommunication.Generally,thisexpressionofth
—Wastheclasslongenough?—No,itwash’t______enough.
UncleSamisatall,thinman.He’sanoldermanwithwhitehairandawhitebeard.Heoftenwearsatallhat,abowtie,andth
Ineed______cloth,forI’mgoingtomake______clothes.
Shoppingforclothesisnotthesameexperienceforamanasitisforawoman.Amangoesshoppingbecauseheneedssomething.
Thereis______sugar.Youneedn’tgotobuyany.
随机试题
4周龄北京鸭发病,病鸭食欲减少,喜卧,拉稀,排暗红色粪便,羽毛蓬松,发病几天后有零星死亡。剖检病死鸭发现,小肠弥漫性出血,肠壁肿胀、出血,肠黏膜粗糙,覆盖一层糠麸样或奶酪样或胶冻样黏液。引起该病的主要致病种是
主水饮,肾虚水泛,气血受困的面色特点是
2001年9月13日某省某公路上发生重大恶性交通事故。一辆小型客车落入路旁峡谷,车上四人全部殉难。后来经调查得知:死者李兴,71岁,早年丧偶;死者李良,男,38岁,系李兴之长子,其留有一妻王嫒和一子李小鹏;死者李国,男,35岁,系李兴之次子,其留有一子李云
当事人一方在法律规定的范围内向对方给付了定金。依据法律的规定,该定金应当如何处理?()
《建设工程质量管理条例》规定设计单位有下列行为的,属于违反法律和法规,要追究设计人的责任()。
煤气、天然气的低压系统管道可以采用( )。
现在越来越多的人拥有了自己的轿车,但他们明显地缺乏汽车保养的基本知识。这些人会按照维修保养手册或4s店售后服务人员的提示做定期保养。可是,某位有经验的司机会告诉你,每行驶5000千米做一次定期检查,只能检查出汽车可能存在问题的一小部分,这样的检查是没有意义
阅读材料1,如何评价“真正的真理是根本不变的”这个论断?如何理解材料3所指思维的至上性和非至上性的基本含义?材料3的真理观与材料2的真理观有何联系?
数据库系统的核心是()。
DreamsEveryonecandream.Indeed,everyonedoesdream.Thosewho【C1】______thattheyneverdreamatallactuallydream【C2】__
最新回复
(
0
)