首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
64
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
The author believes that______.
选项
A、many teachers are opposed to the idea of being evaluated by the students
B、students are opposed to the idea of evaluating the teachers on their own
C、students fear that they are likely to be criticized by their teachers if they are to give their assessments
D、many teachers fear that they are likely to criticize the students who have given their assessments
答案
A
解析
参考文章第二段,其中用了两个argue,表明作者认为许多教师是反对由学生评判自己的教课水平的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/f6iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
IntheUS,peoplepreferwaitingforatabletosittingwithpeopletheydon’tknow.Thismeansahostessmaynotscatasmallg
Americansareproudoftheirvarietyandindividuality(个性),yettheyloveandrespectfewthingsmorethanauniform,whetheri
Yourbody,whichhascloserelationswiththefoodyoueat,isthemostimportantthingyouown,soitneedspropertreatmentan
Despitethefactthattodayviruses(病毒)areknowntocausecancerinanimalsandincertainplants,thereexistsagreatreluct
CalifornianMichaelSchwabesaidgoodbyetothegaspumptwoyearsago.Heleasedanelectriccar.Schwabesayshegetsmoreout
UncleSamisatall,thinman.He’sanoldermanwithwhitehairandawhitebeard.Heoftenwearsatallhat,abowtie,andth
Ifyouarelikemostpeople,yourintelligencevariesfromseasontoseason.Youareprobablyalotsharperinthespringthany
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
Thesentence"______White______hissisteriscomingtoourhelp."iswrong.
随机试题
十二指肠球后溃疡的临床特点是
韦氏误听多发于的疾病是
信息化的直接作用在于提高生产效率和经济效益。据估计,信息化促进经济效益的平均倍增比率为()。
下列是非系统的绩效考核方法的是()。
能够引起经济法律关系发生、变更和终止的,人们有意志的活动,是()。
劳动号子是产生并应用于劳动,具有协调与指挥劳动的实际功用的民间歌曲。流行于黑龙江地区的《哈腰挂》是一首()。
Her________filmmadeherearnhighreputationintheworld.
基础教育课程改革应该始终贯彻()的工作方针。
我国科技发展的指导方针是()。
ElectronicMailDuringthepastfewyears,scientistsallovertheworldhavesuddenlyfoundthemselvesproductivelyengaged
最新回复
(
0
)