首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
50
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
The author believes that______.
选项
A、many teachers are opposed to the idea of being evaluated by the students
B、students are opposed to the idea of evaluating the teachers on their own
C、students fear that they are likely to be criticized by their teachers if they are to give their assessments
D、many teachers fear that they are likely to criticize the students who have given their assessments
答案
A
解析
参考文章第二段,其中用了两个argue,表明作者认为许多教师是反对由学生评判自己的教课水平的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/f6iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Animportantbusinessmanwasaskedtogiveatwenty-minutespeechinanothercity.Hewastoobusytowriteithimself,soheas
IntheUS,peoplepreferwaitingforatabletosittingwithpeopletheydon’tknow.Thismeansahostessmaynotscatasmallg
WhatdowemeanbyaperfectEnglishpronunciation?InonesensethereareasmanydifferentkindsofEnglishastherearespeak
WhatdowemeanbyaperfectEnglishpronunciation?InonesensethereareasmanydifferentkindsofEnglishastherearespeak
Theyear2000willbringbigchangesincommunication.Cellphoneswillbesmallenoughtocarryinyourpocket.Videophoneswil
Ifyouarelikemostpeople,yourintelligencevariesfromseasontoseason.Youareprobablyalotsharperinthespringthany
Thesmallnumberofnewbornbabies,whichhasbeencausedbyhighpricesandthechangingsocialsituationofwomen,isoneoft
Agreenhouseisabuildingmadeofglasswhichisusedforkeepingplantswarmwhentheoutsidetemperatureishow.Inasimilar
WhenItookhistemperature,itwastwodegreesabove______.
Willyou______myclotheswhileIgoforaswim?
随机试题
A.灵芝B.朱砂C.琥珀D.远志有补气安神功效的药物是
下列选项中,属于专题橱窗的内容要求的有()。
吴茱萸汤的臣药是
男性,35岁。牙龈出血、皮肤瘀斑及间断鼻出血10天入院。既往体健。化验血常规:Hb64g/L,WBC10.5×109/L,Plt26×109/L。骨髓增生明显活跃,可见胞浆中有较多颗粒及POX染色强阳性的细胞,部分可见成堆Auer小体,计数此种细胞占65%
患者失眠多梦,易醒,胆怯心悸,遇事易惊,气短自汗,倦怠乏力,小便清长,舌质淡,脉弦细。治疗应选用的中成药是
甲承包乙的出租车跑运输,承租期间不慎将车弄坏,乙诉至法院要求甲赔偿。法院受理后,在开庭前一天乙脑出血突发死亡,法院裁定中止诉讼。2个月后,乙的儿子丙申请要求参加诉讼,法院应如何处理?()
国民经济统计中的机构单位是指能够独立拥有资产、承担负债、从事经济活动并与其他单位进行交易的经济实体。()
小规模纳税人发生增值税应税销售行为,合计月销售额未超过10万元的,免征增值税。()
下列各项中,关于所有者权益和负债的联系与区别说法正确的有()。
督察在现场督察时有什么权力?
最新回复
(
0
)