首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
34
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
The author believes that______.
选项
A、many teachers are opposed to the idea of being evaluated by the students
B、students are opposed to the idea of evaluating the teachers on their own
C、students fear that they are likely to be criticized by their teachers if they are to give their assessments
D、many teachers fear that they are likely to criticize the students who have given their assessments
答案
A
解析
参考文章第二段,其中用了两个argue,表明作者认为许多教师是反对由学生评判自己的教课水平的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/f6iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
SupposeyouworkinabigfirmandfindEnglishveryimportantforyourjobbecauseyouoftendealwithforeignbusinessmen.Now
WhatdowemeanbyaperfectEnglishpronunciation?InonesensethereareasmanydifferentkindsofEnglishastherearespeak
Americansareproudoftheirvarietyandindividuality(个性),yettheyloveandrespectfewthingsmorethanauniform,whetheri
Shedecidedtotakeasecondcoursesinceshe______thefirstone.
Oureatinghabitsareveryimportantforgoodhealthandastrongbody.Therearetimeswhenmostofuswouldrathereatsweets
Canadaisthesecondlargestcountryintheworldinarea,althoughits【1】isonlysome25million,most【2】ina200-milestrip【3】
Excuseme,butitistimetohaveyourtemperature______.
______intheopenair,wetclothescangetdryeasily.
Don’t______yourbooksonthefloor.
Notuntil______thewholethingtohim______thathewaswrong.
随机试题
以下列烃为原料的裂解反应,所得氢收率由高到低的排列顺序为()。
旋转阳极X线管的阳极倾角一般在
胰岛素对脂肪代谢的影响是
建设工程监理组织协调中的会议协调法包括( )。
对于企业使用政府补助、转贷、贴息投资建设的项目,政府需要审批( )。
一个全面的财务规划涉及保险规划、税收规划、人生事件规划及投资规划等财务安排问题,不涉及现金、消费及债务管理。()
某学校在期中考试时设立诚信考场,实行无人监考。考前,学生们都要签诚信承诺书,保证自己在考场上人格得一百分。该做法属于()。
执行?AT(“a+b=c”,“+”)语句后,屏幕显示的结果为______。
以下程序运行后的输出结果是【】。main(){inti,n[]={0,0,0,0,0};for(i=1;i<=4;i++){n[i]=n[i-1]*2+1;printf("%d",n[i]);}
HetalkedasifI______(be)hisbrothertohelphimalot.
最新回复
(
0
)