首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
You are what you eat, or so the saying goes. But Richard Wrangham, of Harvard University, believes that this is true in a more p
You are what you eat, or so the saying goes. But Richard Wrangham, of Harvard University, believes that this is true in a more p
admin
2015-10-21
56
问题
You are what you eat, or so the saying goes. But Richard Wrangham, of Harvard University, believes that this is true in a more profound sense than the one implied by the old proverb. It is not just you who are what you eat, but the entire human species. And with Homo sapiens, what makes the species unique in Dr. Wrangham’s opinion is that its food is so often cooked.
Cooking is a human universal. No one other than a few faddists tries to survive on raw food alone. And the consumption of a cooked meal is normal in every known society. Moreover, without cooking, the human brain(which consumes 20-25% of the body’s energy)could not keep running. Dr. Wrangham thus believes that cooking and humanity are coeval.
In fact, he thinks that cooking and other forms of preparing food are humanity’s "killer app": the evolutionary change that underpins all of the other—and subsequent—changes that have made people such unusual animals.
Humans became human with the emergence 1. 8m years ago of a species called Homo erectus. This had a skeleton much like modern man’s—a big, brain-filled skull and a narrow pelvis and rib cage, which imply a small abdomen and thus a small gut. Hitherto, the explanation for this shift from the smaller skulls and wider pelvises of man’s apelike ancestors has been a shift from a vegetable-based diet to a meat-based one. Meat has more calories than plant matter, the theory went. A smaller gut could therefore support a larger brain.
Dr. Wrangham disagrees. When you do the sums, he argues, raw meat is still insufficient to bridge the gap. He points out that even modern "raw foodists", members of a town-dwelling, back-to-nature social movement, struggle to maintain their weight—and they have access to animals and plants that have been bred for the table. Pre-agricultural man confined to raw food would have starved.
Start cooking, however, and things change radically. Cooking alters food in three important ways. It breaks starch molecules into more digestible fragments. It "denatures" protein molecules, so that their amino-acid chains unfold and digestive enzymes can attack them more easily. And heat physically softens food. That makes it easier to digest, so even though the stuff is no more calorific, the body uses fewer calories dealing with it.
In support of his thesis, Dr. Wrangham, who is an anthropologist, has ransacked other fields and come up with an impressive array of material. Cooking increases the share of food digested in the stomach and small intestine, where it can be absorbed, from 50% to 95%. Previous studies had suggested raw food was digested equally well as cooked food because they looked at faeces as being the end product. These, however, have been exposed to the digestive mercies of bacteria in the large intestine, and any residual goodies have been removed from them that way.
Another telling experiment, conducted on rats, did not rely on cooking. Rather the experimenters ground up food pellets and then recompacted them to make them softer. Rats fed on the softer pellets weighed 30% more after 26 weeks than those fed the same weight of standard pellets. The difference was because of the lower cost of digestion. Indeed, Dr. Wrangham suspects the main cause of the modern epidemic of obesity is not overeating but the rise of processed foods. These are softer, because that is what people prefer. Indeed, the nerves from the taste buds meet in a part of the brain called the amygdala with nerves that convey information on the softness of food. It is only after these two qualities have been compared that the brain assesses how pleasant a mouthful actually is.
The archaeological evidence for ancient cookery is equivocal. Digs show that both modern humans and Neanderthals controlled fire in a way that almost certainly means they could cook, and did so at least 200,000 years ago. Since the last common ancestor of the two species lived more than 400,000 years ago, fire-control is probably at least as old as that, for they lived in different parts of the world, and so could not have copied each other.
Older alleged sites of human fires are more susceptible to other interpretations, but they do exist. And traces of fire are easily wiped out. so the lack of direct evidence for them is no surprise. Instead, Dr. Wrangham is relying on a compelling chain of logic. And in doing so he may have cast light not only on what made humanity, but on one of the threats it faces today.
What is the role of the 7th and 8th paragraphs in the development of the topic?
选项
A、To illustrate how cooking provides more calories by facilitating absorption and reducing energy consumption.
B、To make a comparison between the patterns of digestion of human and those of other species.
C、To show that cooking is not the only way to improve digestion.
D、To prove that obesity may not be caused by overeating.
答案
A
解析
篇章题。第六段提出论点:烹饪使淀粉和蛋白质分子更易分解消化,并且使食物软化,减少消化过程所耗费的热量。第七段和第八段则分别予以分析论证,因此[A]“说明烹饪如何促进吸收和减少热量消耗,从而提供更多热量”正确。这两段没有对人类和鼠类等其他物种的消化方式进行对比,因此可排除[B]“将人类与其他物种的消化方式进行对比”;[C]“说明烹饪不是改善消化的唯一手段”和[D]“证明肥胖症或许不是过量进食导致的”的说法的确在第八段中得到印证,但并不能全面概括第七段和第八段的整体作用,所以均排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/fLKO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Itisestimatedthatthereareabout800,000peoplecalledSmithin______.
ThenewprisonisusingallofthefollowingsecuritymethodsEXCEPT______.
Somepeoplethinkthatuniversityeducationshouldbevocation-oriented.Whatdoyouthink?Writeanessayofabout400words.
A、Hispicture.B、Hisapartmentnumber.C、Hispseudonym.D、Hisvita.B新闻中提到国际刑警很快从众多的线索中确定了一条有用线索,此线索包括此男的艺名、一张照片以及他的个人简历。B不在此列,是
HowPracticeCanDamageYourEnglish?I.NewinterpretationsofspeakingandwritinginlearningEnglishA.Speakingandwriting
ObservingBehaviorPeopledoobservationindailylifecontextforsafetyorforproperbehavior.However,therearediffere
CriticsandsupportersoftheUnitedNationshavesometimesseenworldsapart.Butsincelastyear,almostallofthem,whether
Oneofthefirstthingsthatshouldstrikeanyhalfobservantparentisthespeedandapparentaccuracyinwhichachildproceed
Syntacticmovementisdictatedbyrulestraditionallycalled______.
"Thistheoryoffersaneatandconsistentaccountforthetypologicaldifferenceinthewordorderwithintheverbphrasecatego
随机试题
有如下程序:#includeusingnamespacestd;classBase{public:Base(intx=0){cout
患者,男,29岁。发现血压升高2~3年,血压最高180/100mmHg,尿常规检查示尿蛋白(++),血生化检查示血肌酐642μmol/1,最可能的诊断是
一日,甲带邻家男孩乙到公园玩,甲想“吓唬”乙一下,就提着他的双脚将其倒悬于一座桥的栏杆外,乙边喊“饶命”边挣扎,甲手一滑,乙掉入河中,甲急忙去救,乙已溺水而亡,甲对乙的死亡结果在主观上所持的心理态度是:()
根据《期货公司管理业务试点办法》,下列人员可以作为期货公司资产管理业务客户的是()。
某企业月初结存材料的计划成本为250万元,材料成本差异为超支45万元;当月入库材料的计划成本为550万元,材料成本差异为节约85万元;当月生产车间领用材料的计划成本为600万元。当月生产车间领用材料的实际成本为()万元。
小亮3岁半,在幼儿园里,他很喜欢搭积木,每当有人问谁搭得漂亮时,他总是说自己搭得好,而事实并非如此。问题:请结合幼儿自我评价的有关原理加以分析。
根据《中华人民共和国宪法》的规定,处理全国人大常委会的重要日常工作的机关是()。
一古代算数例题:“今有大夫、不更、簪袅、上造、公士凡五人。共猎得五鹿,欲以爵次分之,问各得几何?”书中记载正确的答案是:他们依次分别得到5/3、4/3、1、2/3、1/3只鹿。请问,这道算数题反映了古代中国社会的哪项特色?
下列单位或个人可以成为纳税保证人的有()。
若f(x1,x2,x3)=2x12+x22+x32+2x1x2-tx2x3是正定二次型,则t的取值范围是________.
最新回复
(
0
)