首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
At Harvard College in September, a controversy erupted over the adoption of a "freshman pledge," which for the first time asked
At Harvard College in September, a controversy erupted over the adoption of a "freshman pledge," which for the first time asked
admin
2015-06-14
566
问题
At Harvard College in September, a controversy erupted over the adoption of a "freshman pledge," which for the first time asked incoming students to sign a commitment to act with respect, integrity, and kindness in order to "promote understanding." Libertarian commentator Virginia Postrel, wrote that "treating ’kindness’ as the way to civil discourse doesn’t show students how to argue with accuracy and respect. " Harry R. Lewis, a former dean of Harvard College and someone with an excellent perspective on undergraduate education, warned that it impinged on freedom of thought and that "a student would be breaking the pledge if she woke up one morning and decided it was more important to achieve intellectually than to be kind."
Has empathy become the new scapegoat in the long-standing concern about academic attainment in American schools? Books like Academically Adrift chart the decline in academic rigor on American college campuses, citing the plummeting hours that students spend on studying and critical thinking skills. But there’s also been a troubling, and concurrent decrease in empathy over the past thirty years. A study of 14,000 college students published in Personality and Social Psychology Review in 2011 showed that the majority of college students today are less empathetic than their predecessors of prior decades. And other research even shows that education(like medical school!)can actually wring the empathy out of students.
Many people are squeamish about calls to increase empathy in young people because they wrongly assume that the ability to empathize is incompatible with traits like logic, reason, and impartiality. We’ve now entered a debate about how nice we should be or, rather, how nice we can afford to be and still stay competitive as a society, clinging to the pernicious belief that anything beneficial to young people must be painful and that we are in a rat race that is a zero-sum game.
In fact, there need be no tradeoff, at Harvard or anywhere else, between intellectual rigor and kindness. This is a false dichotomy, like the belief that a sick person must choose between a competent doctor and a humane one. Indeed, empathetic behavior listening well, for example actually makes a doctor better able to diagnose and treat illness, and studies show that when doctors are empathetic, their patients need less medication to relieve pain and less time to heal wounds.
People often equate empathy with gentleness and passivity. But empathy is really just a cognitive walk in another person’s shoes. An empathetic person is, fundamentally, a curious and imaginative person. Empathy involves a search for understanding. And we need today’s students to understand the world better in order to respond to its seemingly intractable problems.
Many educators agree that the intellectual skills required for the 21st century depend on not only a mastery of facts and figures, but also on complex communication, flexibility, collaboration, adaptability, and innovation. We live in a more open society than ever, with greater mixing of people and ideas.
The ability to master a new language, to translate scientific findings into policy, or to weave the concerns of one field into the terms of another(the way a Macintosh computer melds engineering and design), requires students to step outside of their own life experience and habits of mind. Steve Jobs had empathy for his customers.
Of course, we can always find examples of world-class thinkers who are oblivious to people’s feelings. But that doesn’t negate the fact that the vast majority of students will need to assume the perspective of others in order to get ahead in life. We can call this empathy. Or we can call it 21st century learning. It’s both. Empathy doesn’t always lead to more moral behavior, but it can lead to more intelligent behavior.
According to the passage, an empathetic person can be all the following EXCEPT
选项
A、smart.
B、ethical.
C、creative.
D、inquisitive.
答案
B
解析
细节题。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ffOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingnovelistswroteTheSoundandtheFury
A、Performanceatworkmattersmorethananythingelse.B、Therearelawsprotectingemployees’workingrights.C、Goodreasonsmus
Thethirty-seconddayoutofBombaybeganinauspiciously.Inthemorningaseasmashedoneofthegalleydoors.Wedashedinthr
MyJoyinTeachingandLearningIhavebeenengagedinteachingIntensiveReadingCoursetoPhD【1】ofScienceandTechnology
Systematiceffortsatnationalnutritionplanningindevelopingcountriesgobackbarelyadecade.Duringthatbrieftimethere
Thenatureoflanguageisthenatureofhumanthoughtandhumanaction,forlanguageisnomorenorlessthanthetoolofboth
Thestudyoftherelationshipbetweenlanguageandsocietyiscalled
Thiswasthecapital’smostanxiousweeksinceSeptember11th.OnMondaythegovernmentissuedaredalertthatterroristattac
ThegeneralelectionoftheUnitedStatesisheldevery______years.
______isthelongestriverintheUnitedStatesandknownasFatherofWaters.
随机试题
我国法律文书发展的历史渊源流长,早在“秦墓竹简”中就出现了较为完备的勘验笔录
新中国第一次提出实现“四个现代化”奋斗目标的会议是()
第三代头孢菌素的特点是
( )会造成监理力量与监理任务严重失衡,使得监理工作难以到位,保证不了建设工程监理的质量和效果。
对在旅游广告中,未标明旅行社名称的旅行社,给予的处罚包括()。
材料一:我国宪法第四十五条规定:“中华人民共和国公民在年老、疾病或丧失劳动能力情况下,有从国家和社会获得物质帮助的权利。国家发展为公民享受这些权利所需要的社会保险、社会救济、医疗卫生事业。国家和社会保障残疾军人的生活,抚恤烈士家属,优待军人家属。国家和社会
给定资料1.中国人讲究礼尚往来,逢年过节来往走动,互赠礼物,互祝安康,也是美好情谊的表达。特别是在结婚这样的喜事上更是讲究礼尚往来。操办婚礼无可厚非,但是动辄十几万甚至几十万的彩礼、几百几千的份子钱,亲朋好友连吃多天的婚宴酒席等大操大办、铺张
在重载一个运算符时,如果其参数表中有一个参数,则说明该运算符是
ThechildrenhadagoodtimeintheparklastChildren’sDay.Thechildren____________intheparklastChildren’sDay.
TheAmericanwarondrugshasgottenallthetypesinrecentyears,butalcoholismisstillthenation’smostseriousaddiction.
最新回复
(
0
)