首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1)Innovation, the elixir of progress, has always cost people their jobs. In the Industrial Revolution artisan weavers were swep
(1)Innovation, the elixir of progress, has always cost people their jobs. In the Industrial Revolution artisan weavers were swep
admin
2018-09-19
47
问题
(1)Innovation, the elixir of progress, has always cost people their jobs. In the Industrial Revolution artisan weavers were swept aside by the mechanical loom. Over the past 30 years the digital revolution has displaced many of the mid-skill jobs that underpinned 20th-century middle-class life. Typists, ticket agents, bank tellers and many production-line jobs have been dispensed with, just as the weavers were.
(2)For those who believe that technological progress has made the world a better place, such churn is a natural part of rising prosperity. Although innovation kills some jobs, it creates new and better ones, as a more productive society becomes richer and its wealthier inhabitants demand more goods and services. Optimism remains the right starting-point, but for workers the dislocating effects of technology may make themselves evident faster than its benefits. Even if new jobs and wonderful products emerge, in the short term income gaps will widen, causing huge social dislocation and perhaps even changing politics.
(3)Why be worried? It is partly just a matter of history repeating itself. In the early part of the Industrial Revolution the rewards of increasing productivity went disproportionately to capital: later on, labor reaped most of the benefits. The pattern today is similar. The prosperity unleashed by the digital revolution has gone overwhelmingly to the owners of capital and the highest-skilled workers. Over the past three decades, labor’s share of output has shrunk globally from 64% to 59%. Meanwhile, the share of income going to the top 1% in America has risen from around 9% in the 1970s to 22% today. Unemployment is at alarming levels in much of the rich world, and not just for cyclical reasons. Fifteen years ago, 65% of working-age Americans were in work: since then the proportion has fallen, during good years as well as bad, to the current level of 59%.
(4)Worse, it seems likely that this wave of technological disruption to the job market has only just started. From driverless cars to clever household gadgets, innovations that already exist could destroy swathes of jobs that have hitherto been untouched. The public sector is one obvious target: it has proved singularly resistant to tech-driven reinvention. But the step change in what computers can do will have a powerful effect on middle-class jobs in the private sector too.
(5)Until now the jobs most vulnerable to machines were those that involved routine, repetitive tasks. But thanks to the exponential rise in processing power and the ubiquity of digitised information ("big data"), computers are increasingly able to perform complicated tasks more cheaply and effectively than people. Clever industrial robots can quickly "learn" a set of human actions. Services may be even more vulnerable. Computers can already detect intruders in a closed-circuit camera picture more reliably than a human can. By comparing reams of financial or biometric data, they can often diagnose fraud or illness more accurately than any number of accountants or doctors.
(6)At the same time, the digital revolution is transforming the process of innovation itself. Thanks to off-the-shelf code from the internet and platforms that host services (such as Amazon’s cloud computing), provide distribution (Apple’s app store)and offer marketing (Facebook), the number of digital startups has exploded. Just as computer-games designers invented a product that humanity never knew it needed but now cannot do without, so these firms will no doubt dream up new goods and services to employ millions. But for now they are singularly light on workers. When Instagram, a popular photo-sharing site, was sold to Facebook for about $1 billion in 2012, it had 30 million customers and employed 13 people. Kodak, which filed for bankruptcy a few months earlier, employed 145,000 people in its heyday.
(7)The problem is one of timing as much as anything. Google now employs 46,000 people. But it takes years for new industries to grow, whereas the disruption a startup causes to incumbents is felt sooner. Airbnb may turn homeowners with spare rooms into entrepreneurs, but it poses a direct threat to the lower end of the hotel business—a massive employer.
(8)If this analysis is halfway correct, the social effects will be huge. Many of the jobs most at risk are lower down the ladder (logistics, haulage), whereas the skills that are least vulnerable to automation (creativity, managerial expertise)tend to be higher up, so median wages are likely to remain stagnant for some time and income gaps are likely to widen.
(9)Anger about rising inequality is bound to grow, but politicians will find it hard to address the problem. Shunning progress would be as futile now as the Luddites’ protests against mechanised looms were in the 1810s, because any country that tried to stop would be left behind by competitors eager to embrace new technology. The freedom to raise taxes on the rich to punitive levels will be similarly constrained by the mobility of capital and highly skilled labour.
(10)The main way in which governments can help their people through this dislocation is through education systems. One of the reasons for the improvement in workers’ fortunes in the latter part of the Industrial Revolution was because schools were built to educate them—a dramatic change at the time. Now those schools themselves need to be changed, to foster the creativity that humans will need to set them a-part from computers. There should be less rote-learning and more critical thinking. Technology itself will help, whether through MOOCs (massive open online courses)or even video games that simulate the skills needed for work.
(11)Yet however well people are taught, their abilities will remain unequal, and in a world which is increasingly polarised economically, many will find their job prospects dimmed and wages squeezed. The best way of helping them is not, as many on the left seem to think, to push up minimum wages. Jacking up the floor too far would accelerate the shift from human workers to computers. Better to top up low wages with public money so that anyone who works has a reasonable income, through a bold expansion of the tax credits that countries such as America and Britain use.
(12)Innovation has brought great benefits to humanity. Nobody in their right mind would want to return to the world of handloom weavers. But the benefits of technological progress are unevenly distributed, especially in the early stages of each new wave, and it is up to governments to spread them. In the 19th century it took the threat of revolution to bring about progressive reforms. Today’s governments would do well to start making the changes needed before their people get angry.
It can be concluded that the author is towards _____ technological progress.
选项
A、indifferent
B、neutral
C、positive
D、negative
答案
B
解析
最后一段首先肯定了科技进步带来的创新的长处,强调没有人会愿意回到过去,接着又提到科技浪潮的初期会引起分配不均,这又是其弊端,所以作者看到其利弊双方,是中立的,故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/fhEK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Attheturnofthe20thcentury,DutchphysicianChristiaanEijkmanshowedthatdiseasecanbecausednotonlybymicroorganism
Whatpersonalqualitiesaredesirableinateacher?Probablynotwopeoplewoulddrawupapproximatelysimilarlists,butI【M1】_
Amazon,whichgotitsstartsellingbooksonline,announcedthisyearthat,forthefirsttime,itsdigitalbookshadoutsold
Wildlifeconservationistssaythecoverthatfoliageprovidesforanimalsisequalinimportancetothefoodsupplying.
Womenweremorelikelythanmentoreporthavingunderstandingsaboutsaferbehavior,suchasagreeingnottogetdrunk(23per
Womenweremorelikelythanmentoreporthavingunderstandingsaboutsaferbehavior,suchasagreeingnottogetdrunk(23per
Accordingtoanewonlinesurvey,oneintenteenagershaveanunderagefriendwhohasorderedbeer,wineorliquorovertheInt
(1)It’sagoldenageforstudyinginequality.ThomasPiketty,aFrencheconomist,setthebenchmarkin2014whenhisbook,"Capi
A、Sheownedacar.B、Shedrovewell.C、Shelikeddrivers’uniforms.D、Itwasherchildhooddream.D此题需要根据相关内容进行推理和归纳。女士说她从小就想学车,
A、Europe.B、Asia.C、Australia.D、NewZealand.D在谈到出口时,男士说没什么国家会从澳大利亚进口香蕉,只有新西兰有小部分是从澳大利亚进口,即D。后面还进一步说,虽然澳大利亚每年种植大量香蕉,但都是给国内市场的。
随机试题
作为独立的法人实体和市场主体,企业存在的直接目的是()。
引领宾客进入按摩室,按摩师应走在宾客前方2~3步远的地方。()
试管婴儿的主要适应证是()。
逆行肾盂造影的禁忌证是
()是出租人根据承租人对出卖人、租赁物的选择,向出卖人购买租赁物,提供给承租人使用,承租人支付租金的合同。
2011年1月,甲公司将闲置厂房出租给乙公司.合同约定每月租金2500元,租期未定。签订合同时,预收租金5000元,双方已按定额贴花。5月底合同解除。甲公司收到乙公司补交租金7500元。甲公司5月份应补缴印花税()。
篝火:驱逐:寒冷
当代中国法的本质属性是()。
软件开发模型(Software Development Model)是指软件开发全部过程、活动和任务的结构框架。渐增模型是在快速开发一个(1)的基础上,逐步演化成最终的软件。螺旋模型综合了(2)的优点,并增加了(3)。喷泉模型描述的是面向(4)的开发过程,
Secondhandsmokeisaccountablefor42,000deathsannuallytononsmokersintheUnitedStates,includingnearly900infants,acc
最新回复
(
0
)