首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In early June, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)—the club of the world’s wealthy and almost wealt
In early June, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)—the club of the world’s wealthy and almost wealt
admin
2017-03-15
61
问题
In early June, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)—the club of the world’s wealthy and almost wealthy nations—released a 208-page document perversely titled Pensions at a Glance. Inside is a rundown of how generous OECD members are to their burgeoning ranks of retirees.
The US is near the bottom, with the average wage earner able to count on a government-mandated pension for just 52.4% of what he got (after taxes) in his working days—and higher-income workers even less. But the picture at the other end of the scale (dominated by Continental Europe) is misleading. Most of these governments haven’t put aside money for pensions. As the ranks of retirees grow and workforces do not, countries will have to either renege on commitments or tax the hides off future workers.
What the OECD data seem to suggest is that you can run a retirement plan that’s fiscally sound but stingy, or you can make big promises that will eventually go sour. The US fits mostly in the former category—for all the gnashing of teeth about Social Security, its funding problems are modest by global standards.
But is that really the choice? Actually, no. At least one country appears to have found a better way. In the Netherlands—"the globe’s No. 1 pensions country," says influential retirement-plan consultant Keith Ambachtsheer—the average retiree can count on a pension equal to 96.8% of his working income. Ample money is set aside to fund pensions, and it is invested prudently but not timidly. Companies contribute to employees’ accounts but aren’t stuck with profit-killing obligations if their business shrinks or the stock market tanks.
The Dutch have steered a middle way between irresponsible Continental generosity and practical Anglo-American stinginess. They have also, to lapse into pension jargon, split the difference between DB and DC plans. In a defined-benefit (DB) plan, workers are promised a retirement income, and the sponsor—usually a corporation or government—is on the hook to provide it. In a defined-contribution (DC) plan, the worker and sometimes the employer set aside money and hope it will be enough.
The big problem with DB is that sponsors are prone to lowball or ignore the true cost. In the US, where corporate pensions provide a key supplement to Social Security, Congress has felt the need to pass multiple laws aimed at preventing companies from underfunding them. In response, some companies spent billions shoring up their funds; many others simply stopped offering pensions. Just since 2004, at least 66 big companies have frozen or terminated their DB plans, estimates Barclays Global Investors. Corporate DB has given way to individual DC plans like the 401 (k) and IRA, But these put too much responsibility on the shoulders of individual workers. Many don’t save enough money, and those who do set aside enough earn returns that are on average much lower than those of pension funds.
The Netherlands, like the US, has long relied on workplace pensions to supplement its government plan. The crucial difference is that these pensions were mandatory. Smaller employers had to band together to make a go of it, and industry-wide funds became standard. Run more as independent cooperatives than as captive corporate divisions, the Dutch funds were less prone to underfunding than their US counterparts. When they nonetheless ran into financial trouble in 2002 after the stock market crashed and interest rates sank, the country came up with a unique response. The Dutch funds are now no longer on the hook for providing a set income in retirement no matter what happens to financial markets—that is, they’ve gone DC—but they didn’t shunt everything to individual workers. Risks are shared by all the members of a pension fund, and the money is managed by professionals.
Pension consultant Ambachtsheer argues that this "collective DC" is just what the US needs. Many companies here are improving 401 (k)s to give employees more guidance, and there’s talk in Washington of supplementing (not supplanting) Social Security with near mandatory retirement accounts. But even those changes would fall well short of going Dutch. Countries don’t always set aside enough money to pay for the pensions they promise.
All of the following are true about DB plan EXCEPT that______.
选项
A、the sponsor provides retirement income when the money workers have been setting aside is not enough
B、it is adopted in the United States
C、under a DB plan, companies may provide less money for pensions than needed
D、currently it is not as preferred as individual DC plans in the United States
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/frSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Thebest________ofpeople’sabilitytodealwellwithstressandanxietyistheirsocialconnection.
MaintainingFriendshipinAdolescenceSecondaryschoolcanbea【C1】________placeforadolescentswhodon’thaveabestfrien
MaintainingFriendshipinAdolescenceSecondaryschoolcanbea【C1】________placeforadolescentswhodon’thaveabestfrien
InDecember,WaymoLLC,theleadingdriverlesscarcompany,broughtouttheworld’sfirstcommercialrobo-taxiservice.Butfor
TightelectricitysupplyisconstrainingChina’seconomicgrowth--asituationlikelytopersistforthreetofouryearsuntilne
Representativesofthegovernmentsof47countries,22internationalorganizations,54privatesectorentitiesand116non-governm
A、ByaSupremeCourtruling.B、Bystatelegislation.C、Byavoteoftheresidents.D、Bythesocialtrendthatinterracialmarria
Thespeakermainlydiscusses______.
WhatistheproblemwithphotographyofAfrica?
A、Notmentioned.B、Two.C、Five.D、None.B
随机试题
A.贫血与出血程度不一致B.贫血与出血程度一致C.有贫血而无出血D.有出血而无贫血E.无贫血亦无出血ITP是
小柴胡汤的可以用于治疗
严重肝病时糖有氧氧化及三羧酸循环失常可导致
A.大补阴丸合茜根散B.归脾汤C.大补元煎D.犀角地黄汤E.左归丸特发性血小板减少性紫癜阴虚火旺证应首选
妊娠期妇女禁用的抗感染药物有()
三铰拱满跨承受竖向均布荷载时,其合理拱轴线的形状为()。
所设置的会计科目应符合单位自身特点,满足单位实际需要,这一点符合()原则。
注意事项1.申论考试是对应考者阅读理解能力、综合分析能力、提出和解决问题能力、文字表达能力的测试。2.作答参考时限:建议阅读资料40分钟,作答110分钟。3.仔细阅读给定资料,按照后面提出的“作答要求”依次作答。4.
北美青少年的平均身高增长幅度要大于中国同龄人。有研究表明,北美中小学生的每周课外活动时间要明显多于中国的中小学生。因此,中国青少年要长得更高,就必须在读中小学时增加课外活动时间。以下哪项是上述论证所必须假设的?
QuantityA:kisanintegerbetween1and100,inclusivewhatisprobabilitythatk×(k+1)×(k+2)×(k+3)×(k+4)isdivisibleby20Q
最新回复
(
0
)