首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Are some people born clever, and others born stupid? Or is intelligence(智力)developed by our environment and our experience? Stra
Are some people born clever, and others born stupid? Or is intelligence(智力)developed by our environment and our experience? Stra
admin
2016-10-25
44
问题
Are some people born clever, and others born stupid? Or is intelligence(智力)developed by our environment and our experience? Strangely enough, the answer to both these questions is yes. To some extent our intelligence is given us at birth, and no amount of special education can make a genius(天才)out of a child born with low intelligence. On the other hand, a child who lives in a boring environment will develop his intelligence less than one who lives in rich and varied surroundings. Thus the limits of a persons intelligence are fixed at birth, but whether or not he reaches those limits will depend on his environment. This view, now held by most experts, can be supported in a number of ways.
It is easy to show that intelligence is to some extent something we are born with. The closer the blood relationship between two people, the closer they are likely to be in intelligence. Thus, if we take two unrelated people at random(随意)from the population. it is likely that their degrees of intelligence will be completely different. If on the other hand we take identical twins, they will very likely be as intelligent as each other. Relations like brothers and sisters, parents and children, usually have similar intelligence, and this clearly suggests that intelligence depends on birth.
Imagine now that we take two identical(同一的)twins and put them in different environments. We might send one, for example, to a university and the other to a factory where the work is boring. We would soon find differences in intelligence developing, and this indicates that environment as well as birth plays a part. This conclusion us also supported by the fact that people who live in close contact with(与……相接触)each other, but who are not related at all, are likely to have similar degress of intelligence.
To show that intellingence depends on birth, we may______.
选项
A、have two identical twins’ blood tested, and then compare the results
B、have two unrelated people’s blood tested, and then compare the results
C、respectively examine the intelligence of brothers and sisters as well as that of parents and children, and then compare the results
D、respectively examine the intelligence of two identical twins as well as that of two unrelated people taken at random, and then compare the results
答案
D
解析
文章第二段讲到如果在人群中随意找来毫无血缘关系的两个人,或找来血缘相同的一对双胞胎进行研究,结果可能是:前者的智力完全不同,后者的智力非常相似,D项符合这一意思。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/gVHC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库普高专升本分类
0
英语
普高专升本
相关试题推荐
A、RomeB、radioC、homeworkD、honorD
Moreover,theycannotaffordtosleeptoolongortoodeeply,becausetheirsurvivaldependsontheirabilitytorunawayfroma
We______tostartourownbusiness,butweneverhadenoughmoney.
Oneofthemostimportantfeaturesthatdistinguishesreadingfromlisteningisthenatureoftheaudience.【C1】______thewriter
Tradeunionsoften______withemployersforbetterconditionsofpayemployment.
Anyonewhohasspenttimewithchildrenisawareofthedifferenceinthewayboysandgirlsrespondto______situations.
A、Gotopsychologyclass.B、Getfullypreparedbeforespeakinginpublic.C、Trytoforgetaboutpeoplewhilespeakinginpublic.
OverheadbridgesarefoundinmanypartsofBeijing,especiallyinplaceswheretrafficisveryheavyandcrossingtheroadisd
我的祖母虽然已经80多岁了,身体却很健康。
他希望写一篇能够引起公众对此事关注的文章。
随机试题
论述国民政府的改订新约运动。(浙江大学2006年中国通史真题)
葛根芩连丸的君药是()
下列哪项关于修建性详细规划特点的表述是不正确的?
我国发生的绝大多数地震属于浅源地震,一般深度为()km,浅源地震造成的危害最大。
下列对教学策略的基本特点的叙述,不正确的是()。
给定资料资料1自2008年全球金融危机以来,我国的出口形势面临巨大的压力,2009—2012年,我国的贸易顺差占当年外贸进出口总值的比例分别为5.9%、6.2%、4.3%和5.9%,远远低于之前两位数的顺差比例。2013年,我国货物贸易的出口额
“点击此处设为首页”,这句提示在2000年的时候遍布各个网站。不论中文网站还是英文网站,都会习惯性地在右上角添加上这么一条,生怕电脑白丁们不知道如何设置首页。可2005年之后,这种“善意”的提示仿佛一夜之间消失了,就如同一份报纸省略掉了自己的征订热线一样,
下列哪一项不是计算机病毒的特性?
TheTechnologicalSocietyInternationalDepartmentCoursedates,feesandotherexpensesLocation:1BrimstonSquareFeeinclude
Whatgoods’doesthebuyerorder?What’sthepurposeforthesellertowritethisletter?
最新回复
(
0
)