首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Coming soon to a theater near you: a multimillion-dollar battle over coming attractions. Theater owners are squeezing extra coin
Coming soon to a theater near you: a multimillion-dollar battle over coming attractions. Theater owners are squeezing extra coin
admin
2014-09-09
35
问题
Coming soon to a theater near you: a multimillion-dollar battle over coming attractions. Theater owners are squeezing extra coin out of film companies by charging them to play the trailers for their upcoming movies. Traditionally, theater owners were happy to run the advertisements for upcoming movies on the understanding that they drove box-office receipts and concession-stand sales. Studios paid to make the trailers, and cinemas screened them. Each movie came with two coming attractions attached, while others often ran at the discretion of the theater.
But now theater owners, realizing the value of having Hollywood’s target audience already in the theater, have begun charging movie companies to run their trailers. Although some trailers still run for free, movie distributors complain that they’re increasingly being asked to pay to get their trailers played—or get shut out. "We’ve reached the tipping point," said Jeffrey Neuman, chief executive of Verites, a company paid by studios to check theaters to see that trailers are being shown and that marketing materials such as lobby cards and standees are in place. "If you’re not one of the ones paying for trailers, you’re left struggling for placement. "
In one controversial move, the nation’s largest cinema chain, Regal Entertainment Group, recently cut the number of trailers that studios can run with their own movies for free to one from two. Some studio executives are privately grumbling about the practice, upset that they are being asked to pay still more to a supposed partner that typically keeps half the box-office receipts. "It’s logical a theater operator has an obligation to market studios’ movies, when we’ re spending hundreds of millions of dollars on making each one," said one studio executive who asked not to be identified because of the sensitive nature of the topic. "But they have gone all the way around to wanting to be paid. "
Four of the major studios—20th Century Fox, Sony Pictures, Universal Pictures and Warner Bros. —reportedly have made annual marketing deals worth several million dollars with theater chains. In exchange, the studios are exempt from the one-free-trailer-only rule and get the best possible placement. Walt Disney Studios and Paramount Pictures don’ t have such deals, while smaller studios may pay as much as $100, 000 to play a trailer for one film. Some coming attractions still make it on the screen through studio executives lobbying and cajoling contacts at theaters with whom they have long-standing relationships. But such old-fashioned methods that don’ t involve payments are increasingly rare.
Large theater chains won’t publicly acknowledge that they charge for trailers, nor will the studios that pay them. But within the film and exhibition industries, it’s common knowledge—and a growing source of resentment. "Everybody says, ’No, no, there’s no money ever paid to show trailers,’ but we know that’s not the case for some of the big boys," said Rafe Cohen, president of Galaxy Theatres, a chain that operates 115 screens. "For us little guys, we’d love to charge for trailers, but we don’t have the leverage. "
The dispute marks the latest flare-up between film companies and exhibitors, whose symbiotic relationship has been strained in recent years. Turning trailers into a business, some fear, could add to the tension. "What makes this business run are trailers," said Chuck Viane, a former president of distribution for Walt Disney Studios. "When the right trailers aren’t seen by the public with the right movie, that can hurt the box office. "
Although Regal’s one-trailer-only rule is new, the free trailer system began to break down in 2001, when Sony paid to advertise its comedy "The Animal" in front of the hit Universal movie "The Mummy Returns. " That aberration soon became the norm, with pay-for-play accelerating in the last two years. As they rose in value, the total number of trailers shown before a movie started going up. Three or four was the norm a decade ago. Regal and AMC theaters now run six or seven before every feature. "The number of trailers has absolutely exploded," said Federico Ponce, owner of High Res Hype, a graphic and design company that has worked on trailers for such movies as "The Avengers" and "Iron Man. " "When we started out, we’d work on one or two trailers every four months. Now we’re doing three or four trailers at the same time. "
The competition is fierce, and prices high, to run a trailer in front of popular movies such as "The Hobbit. " Theater chains typically receive $25,000 to $100,000 to run a spot before a popular film at half their theaters—saving an equal amount of time at the other half of their theaters for another paid trailer. Theater owners charge more for the final trailer before a movie starts because, Neuman said, "There’s a big difference between how many people see the first trailer and the last. "
What is a trailer? What is the multimillion-dollar battle between theater chains and studios?
选项
答案
A kind of movie ads & attractions/made and paid by movie studios/promoting new/upcoming movies/to attract audience(to market studios’ movies)/traditionally, one movie shown with two trailers provided by studios/running the attractions are usually free to studios/today, realizing the business opportunities+ the value of having Hollywood’s target audience already in the theatre/huge amounts of money + prof its can be collected from showing trailers/studios’ reluctance to pay the fees and resentment over the acts
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/gWSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
"Historydoesn’trepeatitself,"arguedMarkTwain,"butitdoesrhyme."Inthisinstance,history’sechocouldscarcelybemo
"Historydoesn’trepeatitself,"arguedMarkTwain,"butitdoesrhyme."Inthisinstance,history’sechocouldscarcelybemo
"Historydoesn’trepeatitself,"arguedMarkTwain,"butitdoesrhyme."Inthisinstance,history’sechocouldscarcelybemo
Inthe1400s,artistsoftencreatedtheirownpigmentsbypulverizingsemipreciousstones.
Duetothefactthatuniversitiescannotenrollallthecandidates,________touniversityiscompetitive.
Althoughsalmonmaytravelhundredsofmilesfromwheretheywerespawned,theywillultimatelyreturntheretolayeggs.
Whenhefirststartedinuniversity,hereallyfeltat________withhismajor—economics.
OxfordandCambridgeUniversityBoatClubshavebothtakentheopportunitytotraveltoSpainthismonthtotraininlesstestin
OxfordandCambridgeUniversityBoatClubshavebothtakentheopportunitytotraveltoSpainthismonthtotraininlesstestin
Ingeneral,oursocietyisbecomingoneofgiantenterprisesdirectedbyabureaucraticmanagementinwhichmanbecomesasmall,
随机试题
女性,16岁,14岁初潮,月经期第1天下腹痛最剧,持续2~3天缓解,伴恶心、呕吐,月经持续5天,经血通畅。应与以下疾病鉴别,哪项除外
患者疑寰枢关节脱位,请从下列中选出最佳体位
肱骨外科颈骨折,正确的摄影体位是
A、只靠上冲加压B、以调节下冲在模孔中的位置实现片重调节C、靠上下冲同时加压D、只靠下冲加压E、具压力缓冲装置单冲压片机及旋转式压片机
该酒店的装饰装修工程合同采用固定总价是否妥当?为什么?建设工程合同按照承包工程计价方式可划分为哪几类?
甲公司是一家制造企业,为扩大产能决定添置一台设备。公司正在研究通过自行购置还是租赁取得设备。有关资料如下:(1)如果自行购置,设备购置成本为1000万元。根据税法规定,设备按直线法计提折1日,折旧年限为8年,净残值为40万元。该设备预计使用5年,5年
由于审计测试及被审计单位内部控制的固有限制,如在投资决策时人为判断可能出现错误和由于人为失误而导致投资内部控制失效,注册会计师依照独立审计准则进行审计,并不能保证发现所有的错误或舞弊。( )如果认为仅实施控制测试获取的审计证据不可能将认定层次的重大错
公民甲一日外出,遇车祸身亡。甲的弟弟乙和母亲丙闻讯后,立即前往出事地点。乙见其兄甲已亡故,遂整理甲散落一地的物品。其中有甲刚刚领取的工资2000元,乙发现后将其交给丙,丙遂将该钱揣入怀中。在乙为其兄料理后事的过程中,共支付丧葬费1000元,丧事处理完后,甲
在下列字符中,其ASCII码值最小的一个是()。
IKnowJustHowYouFeelDoyoufeelsad?Happy?Angry?Youmaythinkthatthewayyoushowtheseemotionsisunique.Well,
最新回复
(
0
)