首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
At Harvard College in September, a controversy erupted over the adoption of a "freshman pledge," which for the first time asked
At Harvard College in September, a controversy erupted over the adoption of a "freshman pledge," which for the first time asked
admin
2015-08-29
43
问题
At Harvard College in September, a controversy erupted over the adoption of a "freshman pledge," which for the first time asked incoming students to sign a commitment to act with respect, integrity, and kindness in order to "promote understanding." Libertarian commentator Virginia Postrel, wrote that "treating ’kindness’ as the way to civil discourse doesn’t show students how to argue with accuracy and respect. " Harry R. Lewis, a former dean of Harvard College and someone with an excellent perspective on undergraduate education, warned that it impinged on freedom of thought and that "a student would be breaking the pledge if she woke up one morning and decided it was more important to achieve intellectually than to be kind."
Has empathy become the new scapegoat in the long-standing concern about academic attainment in American schools? Books like Academically Adrift chart the decline in academic rigor on American college campuses, citing the plummeting hours that students spend on studying and critical thinking skills. But there’s also been a troubling, and concurrent decrease in empathy over the past thirty years. A study of 14,000 college students published in Personality and Social Psychology Review in 2011 showed that the majority of college students today are less empathetic than their predecessors of prior decades. And other research even shows that education(like medical school!)can actually wring the empathy out of students.
Many people are squeamish about calls to increase empathy in young people because they wrongly assume that the ability to empathize is incompatible with traits like logic, reason, and impartiality. We’ve now entered a debate about how nice we should be or, rather, how nice we can afford to be and still stay competitive as a society, clinging to the pernicious belief that anything beneficial to young people must be painful and that we are in a rat race that is a zero-sum game.
In fact, there need be no tradeoff, at Harvard or anywhere else, between intellectual rigor and kindness. This is a false dichotomy, like the belief that a sick person must choose between a competent doctor and a humane one. Indeed, empathetic behavior listening well, for example actually makes a doctor better able to diagnose and treat illness, and studies show that when doctors are empathetic, their patients need less medication to relieve pain and less time to heal wounds.
People often equate empathy with gentleness and passivity. But empathy is really just a cognitive walk in another person’s shoes. An empathetic person is, fundamentally, a curious and imaginative person. Empathy involves a search for understanding. And we need today’s students to understand the world better in order to respond to its seemingly intractable problems.
Many educators agree that the intellectual skills required for the 21st century depend on not only a mastery of facts and figures, but also on complex communication, flexibility, collaboration, adaptability, and innovation. We live in a more open society than ever, with greater mixing of people and ideas.
The ability to master a new language, to translate scientific findings into policy, or to weave the concerns of one field into the terms of another(the way a Macintosh computer melds engineering and design), requires students to step outside of their own life experience and habits of mind. Steve Jobs had empathy for his customers.
Of course, we can always find examples of world-class thinkers who are oblivious to people’s feelings. But that doesn’t negate the fact that the vast majority of students will need to assume the perspective of others in order to get ahead in life. We can call this empathy. Or we can call it 21st century learning. It’s both. Empathy doesn’t always lead to more moral behavior, but it can lead to more intelligent behavior.
According to the passage, an empathetic person can be all the following EXCEPT
选项
A、smart.
B、ethical.
C、creative.
D、inquisitive.
答案
B
解析
细节题。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/gpOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
AmericanLiteratureAliteratureistherecordofhumanexperienceandpeoplehavealwaysbeenimpelledtowritedowntheirimpr
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisnottrueaboutJefferson?
WhichofthefollowingwordsisNOTformedthroughclipping?
WhichofthefollowingisnotthebranchofAmericanFederalgovernment?
WhichofthefollowingwritersisnottherepresentativeofModernisminthe20thcentury?
ThemainthemeofEmilyDickinsonisthefollowingEXCEPT______.
FiveCommonMistakesinConversationsandTheirSolutionsⅠ.NotlisteningA.Problem:mostpeopledon’tlisten—waiteager
ClaremontMcKennaCollege,asmall,prestigiousCaliforniaschool,admittedthatithassubmittedfalseSATscorestopublicati
ClaremontMcKennaCollege,asmall,prestigiousCaliforniaschool,admittedthatithassubmittedfalseSATscorestopublicati
ThemetropolitanpoliceforceofLondonisunderthedirectcontrolof______.
随机试题
A.Zollinger-Ellison综合征B.夏尔科综合征C.Whipple三联征D.Charcot三联征E.倾倒综合征典型胃泌素瘤的临床特点是
A.肺炎链球菌B.金黄色葡萄球菌C.肺炎支原体D.腺病毒E.以上均是引起大叶性肺炎的最常见病原为()
激动组胺H1受体出现的效应有( )。
甲与乙共谋盗窃汽车,甲将盗车所需的钥匙交给乙。但甲后来向乙表明放弃犯罪之意,让乙还回钥匙。乙对甲说,你等几分钟,我用你的钥匙配制一把钥匙后再还给你“,甲要回了自己原来提供的钥匙。后乙利用自己配制的钥匙盗窃了汽车(价值5万元)。关于本案,下列哪一选项是正确的
某单位一幢职工宿舍楼工程未经竣工验收,该厂便擅自安排职工人住。不久,地基基础工程因施工缺陷出现局部下沉。依据《最高人民法院关于审理建设工程施工合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释》有关规定,应对该质量问题承担相应民事责任的主体是()。
下列说法正确的是()。
材料四:阅读下面的短文。完成76—80题。在地面上,行走是指用双腿克服地球引力,轮流迈步,从一处地面走向另一处地面。但在太空轨道飞行的失重环境中.失重将行走的概念完全搞乱了。在航天器密封座舱中行走,只要用脚、手或身体任何部位触一下舱壁或任何固定的
本质上说,语言的发展是一个自我筛选、自我调适、自我更新、自我净化的过程。一味地拒绝排斥并不是“保卫汉语、纯洁汉语",自我封闭只会导致汉语逐渐失去生命力。语言最重要的功能是交流,不要赋予其太多的意识形态功能,更不能将“收录字母词"夸大为“从根本上破坏中国文化
标志着人类对宇宙空间的认识,由探索阶段进入开发利用阶段的是:
在改革深入的过程中,建立在社会分工基础上的整个社会结构进行了重组,以拥有知识。从事脑力劳动为特征的社会阶层和社会群体日益增多。使得社会群体呈现出多层次化。这些新阶层包括
最新回复
(
0
)