2. 考研
  3. With the usual flood of immigrants from non-English-speaking countries, there comes a multicultural work force. Along with this

With the usual flood of immigrants from non-English-speaking countries, there comes a multicultural work force. Along with this

admin2015-02-12  48
问题     With the usual flood of immigrants from non-English-speaking countries, there comes a multicultural work force. Along with this diversity comes resentment felt by natives in the marketplace. Feelings of antagonism surface when accents are strong or foreign languages are used that some workers cannot understand. There is now a clash of forces in the workplace; the battle is centered around English-only policies. A growing number of workers are alleging discrimination on the basis of language.
    The federal law prohibiting job discrimination comes under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964(Title VII), which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. National-origin discrimination makes it illegal to discriminate against an individual because of birthplace, ancestry, culture or linguistic characteristics common to a specific ethnic group. A rule requiring that employees speak only English on the job may violate Title VII unless an employer shows that the requirement is necessary for conducting the business. If the employer believes such a rule is necessary, employees must be informed of when English is required and the consequences for violating the rule.
    Donna Fernandez, language rights attorney at the Employment Law Center of San Francisco, finds that language discrimination is very prevalent in the workplace. Fernandez states that the biases may include "English-only policies when the employee’s primary language is other than English" or "some people may be treated differently because they speak with an accent."
    It is illegal for an employer to discriminate against an employee because of language. However, the increase in language discrimination suits indicates that employers are treating employees speaking with an accent or in a foreign language differently. "Many companies don’t know they are breaking the law with the English-only policies," says Fernandez. The law in this area is still developing and many courts consider these policies to be a form of discrimination on the basis of race or national origin.(National origin refers to the country that a person, or that person’s ancestors, came from.)Employees can challenge a speak-English-only policy if: the rule is applied to employees who speak no English; they have difficulty speaking English; or the policy creates, or is part of, a work environment that is hostile toward national origin minority employees. An employer must show some "business necessity" for the policy. Even if there is a business need, the policy is still illegal if there are less discriminatory alternatives to the policy.
    Sibylle Gruber, assistant professor of English at Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Ariz., finds that employees may feel they are viewed as less intelligent if they cannot speak English perfectly. "Workers may miss out on promotions to positions of authority if they can’t express themselves or communicate clearly," says Gruber. Often, there are subtle prejudices against some accents more than others. Speaking with a French or British accent is less frowned upon than a Spanish or Vietnamese accent. By not promoting employees because of an accent or language bias, a ghetto effect is created in the work force, keeping certain accents and immigrants in low-level positions.
The last paragraph implies that immigrant workers may face biases in job promotions because______.
选项 A、their use of languages other than English antagonizes fellow workers
B、they are made to feel less intelligent than native workers
C、management-level positions tend to give to employees with good English skills
D、workers who cannot express themselves clearly are rarely promoted
答案C
解析 属信息推断题。相关信息在最后一段第二句：如果他们不能清楚地表达自己的想法或与别人交流，他们可能错过升至要职的机会。题目+选项=本句(句式从条件从句转换成了因果从句)。由此可推知，选项C正确：管理职位往往给那些英语较好的员工(其中原文的authority换成本选项中的management-level)。选项A不是根本原因；选项B与本段中第一句不符：……他们觉得别人会认为自己不太聪明(不是不如本国工人聪明)。选项D中rarely一词语气上与第二句中may miss out不符。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/gz74777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)