首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-08-29
46
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
Psychopathic or Machiavellian people are expected to make the laws probably because
选项
A、common people are tired of the current policy-makers.
B、policy-making will be based on utilitarianism.
C、they are good at making laws and policies.
D、they are likely to bring up brand-new policies.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/gzKO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Alotofpeoplebelievethattelevisionhasaharmfuleffectonchildren.Afewyearsago,thesamecriticismsweremadeofthe
Thelanguagephenomenonthatwordshavingdifferentmeaningshavethesameformiscalled
The______schoolsinBritainwouldadmitchildrenwithoutreferencetotheiracademicabilities.
ThethirteenformerBritishcoloniesinNorthAmericadeclaredindependencefromGreatBritainin_____.
FranklinD.RooseveltRooseveltwaselectedPresidentin1932,whentheUnitedStateswasin【1】.Thenthenewpresidentbegan
FranklinD.RooseveltRooseveltwaselectedPresidentin1932,whentheUnitedStateswasin【1】.Thenthenewpresidentbegan
Languageperformanceandlanguageacquisitionarethetwoprincipleconcernsofthepsychologyoflanguage,orpsycholinguistics
______linguisticsreferstothestudyofalanguageorlanguagesatasinglepointintime,withoutreferencetoearlierorlat
Mr.Duffyraisedhiseyesfromthepaperandgazedoutofhiswindowonthecheerlesseveninglandscape.Theriverlayquietbes
Rightnowwecouldalluseaselectivememorywipe—amagicalerasertoremoveallthemiseryMichaelJacksonenduredandcause
随机试题
(2021年临沂/2019年枣庄市中区)学生以词的声音表象、动觉表象为支柱而进行智力活动,这属于心智技能的()阶段。
A.平衡B.正中平衡C.前伸平衡D.侧平衡E.单侧平衡上下颌人工牙具有尖窝相对、最大面积的、均匀的接触时称
孕激素的生理作用下述何项是正确的
假定图2-9局部平面图(二)中,梁下设预制混凝土垫块L×bb×tb=650mm×240mm×240mm,上部砌体的平均压应力设计值σ0=0.6N/mm2,试问梁端有效支承长度α0(mm)与下列何项数值最为接近?
小红是某公司财务部的一名普通会计人员,因工作调动办理会计工作交接时,通常情况下应由()负责监交。
信用风险会受到证券发行人的()等因素影响。Ⅰ.经营能力Ⅱ.盈利水平Ⅲ.事业稳定程度Ⅳ.规模水平
某公司2014年度财务报告于2015年3月30日编制完成,注册会计师于2015年4月20日完成审计工作,于2015年4月26日经董事会批准对外公布,2015年4月27日实际对外公告,则该公司报告年度资产负债表日后事项的涵盖期间为2015年1月1日至201
某日,一列从甲地开往乙地的高铁列车一等座车厢内,乘客姜某从丙地上车,发现原本购买二等座车票的乘客高某坐在自己的座位上。姜某要求高某按照票面坐席乘车,但高某拒不起身、态度蛮横,且拒绝与到来的乘务人员沟通,自称有病无法起身。高某的言行引来众多乘客的围观议论,李
设都是线性方程组AX=0的解向量,只要系数矩阵A为().
A、Someonewasaccusedofreceivingadvancepaymentformurderingthegovernor.B、NothingwasfoundintheEmergency-runhospital
最新回复
(
0
)