首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-08-29
33
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
Psychopathic or Machiavellian people are expected to make the laws probably because
选项
A、common people are tired of the current policy-makers.
B、policy-making will be based on utilitarianism.
C、they are good at making laws and policies.
D、they are likely to bring up brand-new policies.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/gzKO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Thereiswidespreadconsensusamongscholarsthatsecondlanguageacquisition(MB1SLA)emergedasadistinctfieldofresearchfro
WhichofthefollowingarenativesofNewZealand?
HowtoReduceStressLifeisfullofthingsthatcauseusstress.Thoughwemaynotlikestress,wehavetolivewithit.I.De
Aproblem-relatedtothecompetitionforlanduseiswhethercropsshouldbeusedtoproducefoodorfuel.【1】______areaswill
1 Manypeopleseemtothinkthatsciencefictionistypifiedbythecoversofsomeoftheoldpulpmagazines;theBug-eyedMons
HowDeerSurviveWinterLikemostofthewildanimals,deersurvivethecoldwinterbyusingenergystoredinthesummerand
A、Allmediapeopletrytobeobjective.B、Allpeoplehavesomeprejudice.C、UnlikeradioandTV,newspapersareimpersonal.D、Pe
Mr.Duffyraisedhiseyesfromthepaperandgazedoutofhiswindowonthecheerlesseveninglandscape.Theriverlayquietbes
WhatdoestheCongressplantodoinAugust?
WhyisthereaGermany?PartoftheanswergoesbacktoabattlefoughtinA.D.9inthetreacherousmarshesanddensethickets
随机试题
骨折愈合过程中不包括的阶段为
前牙金属烤瓷冠作龈下边缘的主要优点是
在“资源管理器”中双击一个Word文件,将()。
固定收益理财计划的特点是()。
《巴塞尔新资本协议》的第二支柱是()。
在一次听证会上,参会群众提出了很多问题,而参会的两名某部门工作人员却无法回答。一直很沉默。群众情绪激动,如果你是会场主持方,请问你怎么办?
小明有一个哥哥和一个弟弟,哥哥的年龄是20岁,小明的年龄的2倍加上他弟弟年龄的5倍等于97,小明的哥哥的年龄比弟弟的年龄大几岁?()
结合材料回答问题:“法者,治之端也。”治理一个国家、一个社会,关键是要立规矩、讲规矩、守规矩。法律是治国理政最大最重要的规矩,法治是国家治理体系和治理能力的重要依托。我们党执政70年来,为建设社会主义法治国家进行了长期奋斗和不懈努力,在深刻总结正
战略数据规划可划分为若干步骤来完成,以下各项内容Ⅰ.建立企业模型Ⅱ.确定研究边界Ⅲ.建立业务活动过程Ⅳ.确立实体和活动Ⅴ.审查规划结果()是完成规划时应包含的步骤。
下图是网络地址转换NAT的一个示例。根据图中信息,转换表中①和②处的内容依次应为()。
最新回复
(
0
)