首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How science goes wrong Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself. A)A simple idea underli
How science goes wrong Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself. A)A simple idea underli
admin
2016-04-26
52
问题
How science goes wrong
Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself.
A)A simple idea underlies science: "trust, but verify". Results should always be subject to challenge from experiment. That simple but powerful idea has generated a vast body of knowledge. Since its birth in the 17th century, modern science has changed the world beyond recognition, and overwhelmingly for the better. But success can breed extreme self-satisfaction. Modern scientists are doing too much trusting and not enough verifying, damaging the whole of science, and of humanity. B)Too many of the findings are the result of cheap experiments or poor analysis. A rule of thumb among biotechnology venture-capitalists is that half of published research cannot be replicated(复制). Even that may be optimistic. Last year researchers at one biotech firm, Amgen, found they could reproduce just six of 53 "milestone" studies in cancer research. Earlier, a group at Bayer, a drug company, managed to repeat just a quarter of 67 similarly important papers. A leading computer scientist worries that three-quarters of papers in his subfield are nonsense. In 2000-10, roughly 80,000 patients took part in clinical trials based on research that was later withdrawn because of mistakes or improperness.
What a load of rubbish
C)Even when flawed research does not put people’s lives at risk—and much of it is too far from the market to do so—it blows money and the efforts of some of the world’s best minds. The opportunity costs of hindered progress are hard to quantify, but they are likely to be vast. And they could be rising.
D)One reason is the competitiveness of science. In the 1950s, when modern academic research took shape after its successes in the Second World War, it was still a rarefied(小众的)pastime. The entire club of scientists numbered a few hundred thousand. As their ranks have swelled to 6m -7m active researchers on the latest account, scientists have lost their taste for self-policing and quality control. The obligation to "publish or perish(消亡)" has come to rule over academic life. Competition for jobs is cut-throat. Full professors in America earned on average $135,000 in 2012—more than judges did. Every year six freshly minted PhDs strive for every academic post. Nowadays verification(the replication of other people’s results)does little to advance a researcher’s career. And without verification, uncertain findings live on to mislead.
E)Careerism also encourages exaggeration and the choose-the-most-profitable of results. In order to safeguard their exclusivity, the leading journals impose high rejection rates: in excess of 90% of submitted manuscripts. The most striking findings have the greatest chance of making it onto the page. Little wonder that one in three researchers knows of a colleague who has polished a paper by, say, excluding inconvenient data from results based on his instinct, And as more research teams around the world work on a problem, it is more likely that at least one will fall prey to an honest confusion between the sweet signal of a genuine discovery and a nut of the statistical noise. Such lake correlations are often recorded in journals eager for startling papers. If they touch on drinking wine, or letting children play video games, they may well command the front pages of newspapers, too.
F)Conversely, failures to prove a hypothesis(假设)are rarely even offered for publication, let alone accepted. "Negative results" now account for only 14% of published papers, down from 30% in 1990. Yet knowing what is false is as important to science as knowing what is true. The failure to report failures means that researchers waste money and effort exploring blind alleys already investigated by other scientists.
G)The holy process of peer review is not all it is praised to be, either. When a prominent medical journal ran research past other experts in the field, it found that most of the reviewers failed to spot mistakes it had deliberately inserted into papers, even after being told they were being tested.
If it’s broke, fix it
H)All this makes a shaky foundation for an enterprise dedicated to discovering the truth about the world. What might be done to shore it up? One priority should be for all disciplines to follow the example of those that have done most to tighten standards. A start would be getting to grips with statistics, especially in the growing number of fields that screen through untold crowds of data looking for patterns. Geneticists have done this, and turned an early stream of deceptive results from genome sequencing(基因组测序)into a flow of truly significant ones.
I)Ideally, research protocols(草案)should be registered in advance and monitored in virtual notebooks. This would curb the temptation to manipulate the experiment’s design midstream so as to make the results look more substantial than they are.(It is already meant to happen in clinical trials of drugs.)
Where possible, trial data also should be open for other researchers to inspect and test.
J)The most enlightened journals are already showing less dislike of tedious papers. Some government funding agencies, including America’s National Institutes of Health, which give out $30 billion on research each year, are working out how best to encourage replication. And growing numbers of scientists, especially young ones, understand statistics. But these trends need to go much further. Journals should allocate space for "uninteresting" work, and grant-givers should set- aside money to pay for it. Peer review should be tightened—or perhaps dispensed with altogether, in favour of post-publication evaluation in the form of appended comments. That system has worked well in recent years in physics and mathematics. Lastly, policymakers should ensure that institutions using public money also respect the rules.
K)Science still commands enormous—if sometimes perplexed—respect. But its privileged status is founded on the capacity to be right most of the time and to correct its mistakes when it gets things wrong. And it is not as if the universe is short of genuine mysteries to keep generations of scientists hard at work. The false trails laid down by cheap research are an unforgivable barrier to understanding.
The major journals reject more than 90% of the submitted manuscripts to ensure their exclusiveness.
选项
答案
E
解析
本题涉及学术造假的环境因素,可知答案应在What a load of rubbish标题下的内容查找。本题提到了各主流期刊为了确保自己的质量而设定极高的退稿率,由题干中的数字90%和exclusiveness可快速定位到E段第2句,原文提到主流期刊都设有高达90%的退稿率,题中ensure对应原文的safeguard,而exclu-siveness则对应exclusivity,故本题选E。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/h0e7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Astheearth’ssurfaceswarm,evaporation(蒸发)isdryingoutforestsandsoils,increasingsusceptibilitytofire.Lastsummer,m
Manypeopleoftenenjoyeatingout【C1】______beforeorafteravisittothetheatre.However,mostofuswouldratherkeepthetw
Haveyoueverthoughtaboutwhatdeterminesthewaywearewhenwegrowup?RemembertheTVprogramSevenUp?Itstartedfollowi
Lookingforanewweightlossplan?Trylivingontopofamountain.Mountainaircontainslessoxygenthanairatloweraltitud
Lookingforanewweightlossplan?Trylivingontopofamountain.Mountainaircontainslessoxygenthanairatloweraltitud
TheuseofdeferentiallanguageissymbolicoftheConfucianidealofthewoman,whichdominatesconservativegendernormsinJa
ClothinginChinadidnotonlyevolveovertime;itoftentransformeddramaticallyfollowingdynasticchangesortheimperialde
A、Inanoffice.B、Atahospital.C、Inalibrary.D、Inthesupermarket.A地点场景题。男士让女士复印一份合同,女士回答说打完这封信,立刻给他复印。由此推测,二者应该是老板和秘书的关系,故
A、Heisasportsman.B、Heisanactor.C、Heisaphotographer.D、Heisapublisher.D推断题。短文开头就说,Mr.Foster仅以一本杂志就开启了他的出版事业(starte
随机试题
酮症酸中毒时,机体可发生哪种代偿反应
材料一: 李某(男),29岁,家境优越,工作也很好,某日在夜店碰见了一个女孩,两人没过多久便结婚了,婚后生活比较幸福。后来他的妻子开始接触社会上一些不三不四的人,还染上了毒品。李某在妻子的影响下也开始吸毒,一天李某和妻子因为琐事发生争执,李某失手将妻子推
病马一侧后肢发生浮肿,沿淋巴管出现念珠状结节,随后结节破溃,排出脓汁,长期不愈。该病可能是
以下哪项不是固定桥的组成部分
男,74岁。左腹股沟可复性包块10年,不能回纳8h,以左腹股沟斜疝嵌顿急诊手术,术中见部分嵌顿小肠肠管色暗,无蠕动,行部分肠切除,此时不宜行疝修补术的理由是
容积率与地块面积、建筑密度、建筑层数、建筑总面积、建筑基底面积等指标有密切关系,当各层建筑面积一致时,对它们之间的关系,下列叙述正确的是()。
[背景资料]某公路工程项目(K0+000~K6+000)依法进行招标。该项目有两座公路隧道,施工项目起止桩号分别位于K1+100~K2+200和K4+250~K5+300,有两座公路桥梁,一座位于K0+500,单跨为120m,另一座位于K3+60
( )是从支出的角度计算GDP,因为所有最终产品都是提供给市场的,市场上的需求者购买这些最终产品时就会有等量的支出发生。
对统一性原则的理解正确的是()。
2021年4月,习近平总书记对职业教育工作做出重要指示。他指出,各级党委和政府要加大制度创新、政策供给、投入力度,弘扬工匠精神,提高技术技能人才社会地位,为全面建设社会主义现代化国家、实现中华民族伟大复兴的中国梦提供有力人才和技能支撑。弘扬工匠精神的哲学依
最新回复
(
0
)