首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very near Liverpool Street Station when the first expl
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very near Liverpool Street Station when the first expl
admin
2011-02-11
40
问题
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very near Liverpool Street Station when the first explosion was detonated. Hearing the sirens and seeing London’s emergency personnel respond to the bombings brought back vivid memories of the events of Sept. 11, 2001.
People have not forgotten Sept. 11, 2001. Americans can still recall exactly where they were and what they were doing on that fateful day. But it’s understandable that some remember it as historical fact, lacking the painful impact and immediacy they originally felt. If we allow a dimming of purpose—to eliminate terrorism—these terrorist attacks in London serve as another chilling reminder that we’re still at war.
Something constructive emerges from these tragic, horrible and unexplainable attacks. It is the message that we must remain vigilant in opposing an enemy who intentionally targets innocent civilians.
Since Sept. 11, 2001, the civilized nations of the world have remained mostly united in opposing these despicable, wanton acts of terror. We have had some great successes in that effort. We have arrested perpetrators and plotters, and we have foiled planned attacks. We have reduced the power and scope of those who despise freedom and democracy.
The effort must continue. As we learned Thursday—and in Madrid and Bali—the enemies of freedom have not lost their resolve. We must not lose ours.
Ultimately, the only real defense from terrorist attacks is being able to find out about them in advance. Intelligence gathering has improved but needs to be even stronger, including consistently improving human intelligence and patrol. Police and ordinary citizens must be alert and encouraged to convey information.
Once a terrorist incident does occur, there’s no such thing as a perfect response. By definition, a terrorist attack means people are being hurt or killed. But by studying the response to past attacks, we can better prepare to handle those in the future.
London is one of the most secure cities in the world, steeped in years of dealing with terrorism. The city’s preparation and resolve was evident on Thursday. I am very impressed by London’s reaction to the bombings. Both the emergency personnel and the citizens seemed prepared. The first responders were rapid, well-directed, organized and professional, in accordance with obviously well-tested plans.
As for the citizens, at least a dozen people told me in one way or another, "We knew this was going to happen; it was just a question of when."
That is not only a realistic assessment; it also is a mindset that just might save lives. Political, business and community leaders are sometimes reluctant to talk about terrorism or stage drills to prepare their response because they don’t want to frighten or upset people. But that’s a mistake. People react to emergencies more effectively when they’re not shocked by them.
Tony Blair and London Mayor Ken Livingstone have made preparedness a priority, and their efforts clearly paid off during Thursday’s response to the attacks.
There’s another benefit to preparing for terrorism in advance. Part of the damage the terrorists hope to inflict is the emotional reaction in the wake of the destruction. The reason it’s called’ "terrorism" is that they want fear and its debilitating effects to linger long after the smoke has cleared.
By preparing citizens for the possibility of a terrorist attack, leaders can help minimize the emotional response in the wake of the destruction.
Finally, Thursday’s attacks demonstrate that we must remain committed to confronting and eliminating terrorism. There are those who assert that the efforts to eliminate terror are somehow provoking the terrorists. That is wrong. The terrorists have been attacking innocent people long before Sept. 11, 2001, or the wars in Afghanistan or Iraq.
Seeing Prime Minister Blair speak so forcefully, with President Bush, President Jacques Chirac and other world leaders right behind him; was encouraging. Let’s remember the unity the world shared after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Free nations can and will disagree. But let us always remember that free people must be steadfast and resilient in defending our way of life.
The citizens’ emotional response after the terrorist attack can be reduced by
选项
A、leaders’ good organization.
B、preparing for terrorism in advance.
C、escaping from the attack in time.
D、confronting terrorism positively.
答案
B
解析
该段提到,通过让民众准备,领导者能帮助降低emotional response到最小,结合上一段第1句所提到提前准备应对恐怖主义有另一个好处,可知答案为B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/h2YO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Insomelanguageslike______,pitchvariationsaremeaningdistinctive.Thereforetheyarecalledtonelanguages.
ThecentenaryofthebirthofWilliamFaulkner,oneofthegreatmodernnovelists,wascelebratedinSeptember,1997.Faulknerw
CharacteristicsofaBureaucracyPeopleusuallyholdnegativeopiniontowardsbureaucracy,butaccordingtoMaxWeber,burea
SteveandYaserfirstmetintheirchemistryclassofanAmericanuniversity.YaserwasaninternationalstudentfromJordan.He
Eliot’sinterestedinpoetryinabout1902withthediscoveryofRomantic.Hehadrecalledhowhewasinitiatedintopoetryby
______isthecapitalofScotlandsincethe15thcentury.
Sinceabout1950,publictransportationintheU.S.hashadtostruggletosurvive.Thegrowthofprivateautomobileownership,
WhentheSpanishArmadawasdefeated,therulerofEnglandwas______.
In1066,Englandwasinvadedby______.
随机试题
在进行粪便隐血检查(化学法)前,应嘱病人检查前3天禁食
桃核承气汤的组成中含有
联机检索时使用布尔代数的逻辑运算有
患者男,53岁,饮酒时发生语言不清,呕吐,随即昏迷,右侧肢体瘫痪;血压230/120mmHg,诊断为“脑出血”,为防止出血加重,应首先采取的措施是
甲公司为上市公司,于2012年1月1日销售给乙公司产品一批,价款为1000万元,增值税税率17%。舣方约定3个月付款。乙公司因财务困难无法按期支付。至2012年12月31日甲公司仍未收到款项,甲公司未对该应收账款计提坏账准备。2012年12月31日乙公司与
某工厂的同一种产品分销两个独立市场,两个市场的需求情况不同,设价格函数分别为P1=60-3Q1,P2=20-2Q2,厂商的总成本函数为C=12Q+4,Q=Q1+Q2工厂以最大利润为目标,求投放每个市场的产量,并确定此时每个市场的价格.
关于远程登录,以下哪种说法是不正确的?
Whichofthefollowingcontainsanadverbialclauseofconcession(让步状语从句)?
A、Shelikestheenvironmentthere.B、Shecanhaveahigherpaythere.C、Thecompanyisclosetoherhome.D、Thecompanyoffersa
以下不影响沪深300股指期货持有成本理论价格的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)