首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilization thinkers have usually answered either that it come
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilization thinkers have usually answered either that it come
admin
2015-01-09
53
问题
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilization thinkers have usually answered either that it comes from God, or else through the application of reason.
But in The Bonobo and the Atheist, primatologist Frans de Waal argues that there’s another answer that fits the data better: morality comes from our evolutionary past as a social primate. Like our closest relatives, the apes, humans evolved in small, tightly knit, cooperative groups. As a result, again like the apes, we are exquisitely sensitive to one another’s moods, needs and intentions.
This well-developed empathy provided the trellis on which morality later flowered. De Waal, who is based at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, has been making this case eloquently for many years and over several books, notably in Good Natured back in 1997, and in Primates and Philosophers, 12 years later.
In his new work, he bolsters the argument by drawing on a lot of new research, carefully footnoted for those who want to dig deeper. De Waal distinguishes two degrees of morality. The first he calls "one-on-one morality", which governs how an individual can expect to be treated, and the second "community concern", a larger, more abstract concept that extends to the harmony of the group as a whole.
Chimps and bonobos certainly have the former—they respect ownership, for example, and expect to be treated according to their place in the hierarchy. But de Waal presents several examples—such as a chimp stepping in to stop a fight between two others—that suggest that they also have a rudimentary form of the latter.
The book’s title, incidentally, draws on bonobos because they are more likely than chimps to behave morally, to have concern for each other, to value harmony and so on. This, imagines, de Waal, is something morally inclined atheists would want to emulate. If humans inherited morality from our ancestors, though, what are we to make of religion? Here de Waal moves into the territory he has not explored before. Clearly, religion must do something important, since every human culture has it. But instead of religion giving us morality, de Waal turns the tables. Morality, he argues, probably gave us religion as a way of reinforcing the pre-existing community concern.
If he’s right, then there may be no absolute code of right and wrong out there to be discovered. Instead, each individual’s evolved sense of empathy and concern for the group may help shape the group’s consensus on what kind of behaviour is appropriate. In short, says de Waal, morality may be something we all have to work out together. It’s a persuasive argument, and de Waal’s cautious and evidence-based approach is one that many New Scientist readers are sure to find congenial.
That careful approach is less evident in another book covering some of the same ground. In How Animals Grieve, anthropologist Barbara King sets out to explore the question of whether non-human animals grieve for their dead. It’s an intriguing question, but unfortunately King’s book is largely a succession of anecdotes: the cat who roams the house, crying, in search of its dead litter mate; the dog who waits daily at the train station for its dead master; a dolphin trying to keep her dead calf afloat for days.
Some of these stories make a persuasive case for some animals—especially apes, elephants and cetaceans— sometimes grieving. No surprises there: I suspect most readers would have conceded that ground right from the start.
But King makes little effort to dig any deeper by exploring, for example, the neural machinery and cognitive skills an animal needs in order to be capable of grief. After all, solitary species such as cats have less need for empathy- and its corollary, grief—than social animals, and small-brained creatures such as turtles may simply lack the brainpower or not form lasting pair bonds.
To his credit, de Waal takes full note of such distinctions; King, not so much.
Which statement would Frans de Waal most probably agree to?
选项
A、Bonobos are not as concerned about each other as chimps.
B、Atheists would like to emulate the harmony among Bonobos.
C、Bonobos are a good example to show where morality comes from.
D、Atheists are a group of people who are lack of moral standards.
答案
C
解析
细节题。作者在第六段第一句提到Frans de Waal的书时指出,这本书的名字用倭黑猩猩(bonobos)是因为它们比黑猩猩(chimps)在行为上表现得更道德,故可知,Frans de Waal认为倭黑猩猩是说明道德来源的好例子,故[C]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/h5dO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisINCORRECTaboutMissChan?
Insomecountries,artandmusicarepartofthecompulsorycoursesinsecondaryschools.SomeeducationexpertssuggestthatCh
Homeschoolingistoeducatechildrenathome,typicallybyparentsorsometimesbytutors,ratherthaninotherformalsettings
GuoXue,orthestudiesofChineseancientcivilization,includingphilosophy,history,archaeology,literature,linguistics,et
Somepeoplebelievethatuniversitystudentsshouldberequiredtoattendclassestoguaranteeacademicperformance.Othersbeli
AskanAmericanschoolchildwhatheorsheislearninginschoolthesedaysandyoumightevengetareply,providedyouaskit
WhichofthefollowingwordsisNOTformedthroughclipping?
UltimoVargashadbeeninHatch,NewMexico,onlysixmonths,sinceMarch,andalreadyheownedhisownbusinesstocompetewith
Insixteenth-centuryItalyandeighteenth-centuryFrance,waningprosperityandincreasingsocialunrestledtherulingfamilies
WhichbranchoftheAmericangovernmentisresponsibleformakingfederallaws?
随机试题
冷静是高超的管理艺术,是成熟的政治风范,是领导干部的基本素质。当复杂棘手的问题出现时,当突发性事件出现时,当各种矛盾交织僵持不下时,大家往往会把目光和希望集中到领导者、决策者身上。自古道:上有好者,下必甚焉。领导干部静而有定,能鼓舞士气、凝聚人心,影响带动
仅考虑辐射的线性畸变的最小二乘匹配是()。
控制流动性风险的主要做法是建立(),有效计量、监测和控制正常和压力情境下未来不同时间段的现金流缺口。I.债券估算Ⅱ.现金流测算Ⅲ.确定框架Ⅳ.分析框架
委托代销商品应该在收到代销单位汇来的货款时确认收入。()
某单位2011年招聘了65名毕业生,拟分配到该单位的7个不同部门。假设行政部门分得的毕业生人数比其他部门都多,问行政部门分得的毕业生人数至少为多少名?
窜货指经销商跨过自身覆盖的销售区域而进行的有意识的销售。窜货按照性质可分为恶性窜货、自然性窜货和良性窜货。经销商为牟取非常利润,蓄意向非辖区倾销货物称为恶性窜货;发生在辖区临界处或物流过程,非供销商恶意所为的称为自然性窜货;经销商流通性很强,货物流向非重要
受多元文化和价值观的冲击,甲国居民的离婚率明显上升。最近一项调查表明,甲国的平均婚姻存续时间为8年。张先生为此感慨,现在像钻石婚、金婚、白头偕老这样的美丽故事已经很难得,人们淳朴的爱情婚姻观一去不复返了。以下哪项如果为真,最可能表明张先生的理解不确切?
ItisacknowledgedthatthemodernmusicalshowisAmerica’smostoriginalanddynamiccontributiontowardtheater.Inthelast
TheUnitedStatesiswellknownforitsnetworkofmajorhighwaysdesignedtohelpadrivergetfromoneplacetoanotherinthe
Ifyou’regoingtotheairportbycar,couldyougivemea______?
最新回复
(
0
)