首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish govern
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish govern
admin
2016-06-02
37
问题
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish government’s now infamous, since "fat tax" has caused an international uproar. It’s praised by public health advocates on the one hand and dismissed on the other as nanny-state social engineering gone violent.
I see it as one country’s attempt to stave off rising obesity(肥胖症)rates, when other options seem less feasible. But the policies appear confusing. Why Denmark of all places? Why particular foods? Will such taxes really change eating behaviour? And aren’t there better ways to halt or reverse rising rates of diet-related chronic(慢性的)disease?
Before getting to these questions, let’s look at what Denmark has done. In 2009, its government announced a major tax overhaul aimed at softening the shock of the global economic crisis, promoting renewable energy, protecting the environment, discouraging climate change, and improving health—all while maintaining revenues, of course. The tax reforms make it more expensive to produce products likely to harm the environment and to consume products potentially harmful to health, specifically tobacco, ice cream, chocolate, candy, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, and foods containing lots of fats.
Taxes pay for this through policies that maintain a relatively narrow gap between the incomes of rich and poor. Because its level of income disparity(差异)is relatively low, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor that in many other countries. But the Danes want their health to be better. Life expectancy in Denmark is 79 years, at least two years below that in Japan or Iceland. The stated goal of the tax policies is to increase life expectancy as well as to reduce the burden and cost of illness from diet-related diseases.
Why does the Danish government tax such products as tabacco?
选项
A、Because this tax could narrow the income gap.
B、Because tabacco could pollute the environment.
C、Because this tax could discourage climate change.
D、Because these products may harm the environment and health.
答案
D
解析
由题干中的products,tabacco定位到第三段第三句。该句提到税务改革法案使得生产危害环境的产品的费用更高,使得消费对健康有潜在威胁的产品更昂贵。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/hW5K777K
本试题收录于:
浙江省大学英语三级题库大学英语三级分类
0
浙江省大学英语三级
大学英语三级
相关试题推荐
Toparaphrase18th-centurystatesmanEdmundBurke,"allthatisneededforthetriumphofamisguidedcauseisthatgoodpeople
Thebabyelephant,Sheila,was【D1】_________BelfastZoobecauseoffearsshemightbehitbybombersduringtheBelfastBlitzof
WhatdowelearnaboutDenmark’senergyproject?
A、Shefelthappy.B、Shefeltlonely.C、Shefeltrelaxed.D、Shefeltangry.D信息明示题。从文中多处信息可以得知,孩子们又喊又闹,他很生气,因此答案为D。
A、Workersandpolicemen.B、Farmersandtheunemployed.C、Workersandfarmers.C文中第一句明确告知世贸组织的贸易规定给工人和农民的利益造成了损失。
A、Therestaurant.B、Themarket.C、Thecinema.D、Thesportscenter.B从第二句话得知男士下班之后先要去市场购物,然后去和莎拉打网球,最后两人才要去餐馆,因此根据所提问题确定答案为B。
AGUIDETOTOXICSINTHEHOMEThisfactsheetbringsgoodnews.Therearealternativesto"householdtoxics".Someofthesep
Thoughportrayedas【D1】______inmovies,criminalsin【D2】______areinconceivablystupid.Belowarethreestoriesaboutthem:Cou
A、Hisboss.B、Hisbrother.C、Hisneighbor.D、Hiswife.B对话中女士表示自己还有工作要做,会晚点回家,男士则回答自己会加快速度,因为他的弟弟还在家等他。故在等男士的是他的弟弟。
随机试题
有利于铸件清理的内浇道开设位置说法错误的是()。
有关单一归档系统的优点,描述不正确的是
取向性硅电钢片,宽度为1000mm
下图为北半球某日02时海平面气压分布图(单位:百帕)。读图依据气压分布情况,该日最接近()。
InGradeEightItookphysics.InonetestIget【M1】_____only36percentoftheanswercorrect.Ifailedthe【M2】_____nexton
文饰作用:是指人们在受到挫折后会想出各种理由原谅自己或为自己的失败辩解的现象。根据上述定义,下列现象不属于文饰作用的是()
假定用若干个8K×8位的芯片组成一个32K×32位的存储器,则地址41FOH所在芯片的最大地址是()。
目前,我国人民币实施的汇率制度是()
设随机变量X与Y相互独立,其分布函数分别为FX(x)与FY(y),则z=max{X,Y}的分布函数FZ(z)是
设A为n阶方阵,B是A经过若干次初等变换后所得到的矩阵,则有().
最新回复
(
0
)