首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Fight unhealthy food, not fat people It’s hardly breaking news that junk food is bad for us. But just how bad— and just how
Fight unhealthy food, not fat people It’s hardly breaking news that junk food is bad for us. But just how bad— and just how
admin
2013-10-17
35
问题
Fight unhealthy food, not fat people
It’s hardly breaking news that junk food is bad for us. But just how bad— and just how much food companies know about the addictive(添加剂)components of certain foods, and just how much they deliberately target the most vulnerable consumers knowing they are doing damage—is still being discovered. The New York Times offers the latest installment in this weekend’s magazine with an article about the science of junk food addiction.
Nearly everything written about food in the mainstream media relies on the same narrative: Obesity is bad. That kind of reporting is part of what’s keeping us sick.
There’s no denying the fact that the American public has gotten larger in recent decades. Along with getting fatter, we’ve also seen a rise in illnesses like heart disease and certain cancers. Instead of focusing on how our health is hurting, most of the media coverage uses the term " obesity," making the story more about weight than about health—to the point where it’s become an accepted truth that " fat" equals "unhealthy".
That’s not actually the case, though. While "the obesity epidemic" may be a convenient catch-all for the illnesses and health problems related to our food chain, it’s a lazy term and an inaccurate one. Are we actually worried about public health? Or are we offended by fat bodies that don’t meet our thin ideals? In all seriousness: What good does a focus on body size actually do?
If we’re actually concerned about health, then we should focus on health. The addictive qualities of our food, the lack of oversight(监督), the high levels of chemicals and the government subsidies(补贴)to make prices lower making the worst foods the most accessible should concern us and spur us to action.
Nutrient-deficient(营养缺乏)chemically-processed "food" in increasingly larger sizes is bad for all of our bodies, whether we’re fat or thin or somewhere in between. So is the culture in which fast food is able to thrive. Americans work more than ever before; we take fewer vacation days and put in longer hours, especially since the recession hit. The US remains the only industrialized country without national paid parental leave and without compulsory annual vacation time; we also have no federal law requiring paid sick days. 85% percent of American men and 66% of women work more than 40 hours per week. In Norway, for comparison, 23% of men work more than 40-hour weeks, and only 7% of women.
Despite all this work, American income levels remain remarkably divided into the poorest and the richest, with the richest few controlling nearly all of the wealth. In one of the wealthiest countries on earth, one in seven people rely on federal food aid, with most of the financial benefits going to big food companies who are also able to produce cheap, nutritionally questionable food thanks to agricultural subsidies. The prices of the worst foods are artificially depressed, the big food lobbies have enormous power, and the biggest loser is the American public, especially low-income folks who spend larger proportions of their income on food but face systematic impediments(妨碍)to healthy eating and exercise.
With demanding work days, little time off and disproportionate amounts of our incomes going toward things like health insurance and childcare that other countries provide at a lower cost, is it any surprise that we eat fast-food breakfast on our laps in the car and prefer dinner options that are quick and cheap?
Reforming our food system requires major structural changes, not just saying no to put down that bag of chips. We need to push back against corporate interests. Food companies are incredibly good at positing themselves as crusaders(拥护者)for personal choice and entities simply dedicated to giving the public what it wants. Somehow, big food companies have convinced us that drinking a 32oz soda is a matter of personal liberty, and that the government has no place in regulating how much liquid sugar can be sold in a single container.
In fact, we know—and they certainly know—that human beings are remarkably bad at judging how much we’re eating. Food companies use that information to encourage over-consumption, and to target certain consumers who tend to have less disposable income to invest in healthy food—poor people, people of color, kids.
Food is a social justice issue that has disproportionately negative impacts on groups already facing hardship. That should be an issue for every socially conscious person. But when looking at the large number of problems caused not only by our big food industry but by the policies that enable them and our cultural norms that incentivize poor health choices, too many people simply turn " obesity" into the boogeyman(具有超人力量的恶巫).
Doctors even blame fatness for all sorts of medical conditions and people don’t get proper treatment. Fat women go to the doctor less often for routine cancer screenings, and patients report doctors focusing on their weight and ignoring real medical problems like broken bones and asthma(哮喘).
On the policy side, promoters of laws that incentivize health or push back on corporate food interests such as Michelle Obama’s Let’s Move! initiative, bans on extra-large sodas, and extra SNAP benefits at farmer’s markets inevitably target " obesity" in their campaigns. That strategy has the effect of maligning(诽谤)the beauty of certain bodies instead of encouraging everyone to be healthier and countering the enormous influence of big companies. As a result, many people who should be the natural allies of health-promoting initiatives are put off by the shaming fat language.
"Obesity epidemic" language has also fed into the idea of body size and eating habits as social group. Thinner kale(甘蓝)—eating elite liberals in the Northeast are trying to force-feed cabbage to heavier real Americans in the South and Midwest. No one wins with that kind of cultural polarization.
Yes, let’s push back against big food companies and question their outsized influence in Washington and in our daily lives, and let’s focus on making healthy food more widely accessible. Let’s realize that the challenges extend beyond just what we eat. Let’s fight for the humane(仁爱的)work policies that will make us all healthier.
But let’s do that because public health is all of our concern, not because it’s culturally easy to point the finger at fat people. Giving every member of a society the chance to be as healthy as possible is a moral good. It saves money and it saves lives. So let’s do it the right way and the most effective way without lazily relying on the word " obesity. "
The term "obesity epidemic" has promoted the idea of body size and eating habits as______.
选项
答案
social group
解析
本题考查“肥胖流行”这个措词促成了把体型和饮食习惯看成什么的想法。根据定位句可知,“肥胖流行”这个措辞把体型和饮食习惯看成了社会群体。此处要求填入名词性短语作介词宾语,故social group为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/hgc7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、Apersonshouldknowmoretechnologies.B、Apersonshouldfocusonsomething.C、Apersonshouldworkinmorethanonebranch.
A、Helosthisofficekey.B、Heisunabletotalk.C、Hehasn’tfinishedgradingexams.D、Hedoesn’tlikehisstudents.C本题问“Don遇到
Nowadays,itwasfashionabletospeakofagenerationgap,a【S1】______betweenyoungpeopleandtheirelders.Parentscomplained
A、Shewillprobablyattendclassesregularly.B、Shewillprobablychangehermind.C、Shewillprobablywastesomemoney.D、Shew
TheMissAmericacelebration【C1】______asabeautycontestin1921,butnowpreferstoavoidsuch【C2】______sincebeautyisnolon
TheMissAmericacelebration【C1】______asabeautycontestin1921,butnowpreferstoavoidsuch【C2】______sincebeautyisnolon
A、Hecouldbringsomethingtothewoman.B、He’dbehappytogowiththewoman.C、Hewantsthewomantogethimanewspaper.D、He
SharingEconomicLossesThroughInsuranceEachminuteofthedayornight,everyonefacesapossiblefinancialloss.Ahome
SharingEconomicLossesThroughInsuranceEachminuteofthedayornight,everyonefacesapossiblefinancialloss.Ahome
A、Football.B、Baseball,hockeyandtennis.C、Golfandrunning.D、Shooting,fishingandhorseriding.DWhatarethepastimesoft
随机试题
Althougheachbabyhasanindividualscheduleofdevelopment,generalpatternsofgrowthhavebeenobserved.Threeperiodsofde
A.癌性空洞B.周围型肺癌C.弥漫性细支气管-肺泡细胞癌D.中央型肺癌E.癌性胸水
甲公司向乙公司购买价值10万元的空调,为此甲公司给乙公司开出付款金额为10万元的银行承兑汇票。乙公司收到汇票后,将该汇票背书转让给丙公司,作为向丙公司购买电脑的预付款。丙公司收到该张汇票后,将票据金额变造为20万元,然后背书转让给丁公司,以清偿此前拖欠丁公
【背景资料】某市政公司承接了一项城市中心区的道路绿化工程,在宽20米的路侧绿化带建植草坪及花境。现场内有1株古树,局部有杂草生长。栽植区土壤贫瘠,并有树根、石块、瓦片等。栽植前土壤样品经专业机构检测,有机质含量为1.5%,土壤PH值为7.0,通气孔隙度为
会计职业道德的社会评价是指会计行为当事者之外的组织或个人对会计人员的职业行为的道德性进行评价,主要包括()。
基金管理人的高级管理层负责制定书面的合规政策,适时修订合规政策,报经()审议批准后传达给全体员工定期评价各项合规政策和执行状况。
合同的形式具有多种,在我国只能采取书面形式。()
宪法是一个国家的根本大法,具有至高无上的地位。环顾世界各国的宪法的产生和发展历程,其又呈现出各自不同的发展轨迹和特点。下列有关世界主要国家的宪法的发展与历史的表述不正确的是()。
Johnistheonlyoneofthestudentswho______toFrance.
D、U和A航空公司分别在7月18日、2月12日和10月7日宣布购买飞机。已知以下信息,RM为市场组合收益,RD、RD、RA分别为D、U、A公司的收益率。将这些股票当成一组,计算累计超常收益。画出结果并解释。所有股票的贝塔系数为1,没有其它公告发布。
最新回复
(
0
)