首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided
admin
2011-02-11
76
问题
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided that the nation’s real problem is too many immigrants of too many kinds. Faced with a daily onslaught against migrants it may be understandable to give in to populist bigotry; but it is not forgivable.
Take this, for example: "National citizenship is inherently exclusionary." So no foreigners need ever apply for naturalisation, then. And" ... public anxiety about migration ... is usually based on a rational understanding of the value of British citizenship and its incompatibility with over-porous borders". Straight from the lexicon of the far right. And best of all: "You can have a welfare state provided that you are a homogenous society with intensely shared values.”
These are extracts from an article in the Observer, penned by the liberal intellectual Goodhart, who is just one of several liberal thinkers now vigorously making what they consider a progressive argument against immigration. It goes like this: the more diverse a society, the less likely its citizens are to share common values; the fewer common values, the weaker the support for vital institutions of social solidarity, such as the welfare state and the National Health Service.
There are perfectly good reasons to worry about how we respond to immigration, not least the downward pressure on workers’ wages; the growth of racial inequality; and the exploitation of illegals. But the answer to these problems is not genteel xenophobia, but trade union rights, backed by equality and employment law.
The xenophobes should come clean. Their argument is not about immigration at all. They are liberal Powellites; what really bothers them is race and culture. If today’s immigrants were white people from the old Commonwealth, Goodhart and his friends would say that they pose no threat because they share Anglo-Saxon values.
Unfortunately for liberal Powellites, the real history of the NHS shatters their fundamental case against diversity. The NHS is a world-beating example of the way that ethnic diversity can create social solidarity. Launched by a Welshman, built by Irish labourers, founded on the skills of Caribbean nurses and Indian doctors, it is now being rescued by an emergency injection of Filipino nurses, refugee ancillaries and antipodean medics. And it remains 100% British.
Virtually all of our public services have depended heavily on immigrants. Powell was forced to admit as much when, as minister for health he advertised for staff in the Caribbean. His new admirers will discover that a rapidly depopulating Europe will have no choice but to embrace diversity.
For the moment, however, the liberal Powellites are gaining support in high places. Their ideas are inspired by the work of the American sociologist Putnam, a Downing Street favourite. He purports to show that dynamic, diverse communities are more fragmented than stable, monoethnic ones. But the policy wonks have forgotten that Putnam’s research was conducted in a society so marked by segregation that even black millionaires still live in gated ghettoes.
The prime minister still seems uneasy on the issue. Last week, he wavered uncertainly between backing his pro-immigration home secretary, and a defensive response to Howard’s goading that the government was in a mess on the topic.
Oddly enough, this is a place in the arena of world politics where the PM does not stand shoulder to shoulder with Bush. The Spanish-speaking former governor of Texas recently announced that he would "regularise" the status of millions of illegal Mexican immigrants who had slipped across the border to work. It’s the kind of massive amnesty that would send the Daily Express into conniptions.
Even more peculiar, the prime minister appears to be ignoring not only Blunkett but also his new best friend, the Labour mayor of London, Livingstone, and Scotland’s first minister, McConnell. London wants more immigrants to keep pace with its booming economy, Scotland wants them to boost its ageing work force. Yet the liberal Powellites still seem prepared to confront a Bush-Blunkett-Livingstone-McConnell axis, because they are scared witless by the far right. They hope that by appeasing racism, they’ll make it go away. But this is a beast with an insatiable appetite.
The French discovered that too late; the thuggish National Front is now France’s second largest party, with one in five likely to vote for them in upcoming local elections. Liberal secularists who joined in the assault on the rights of French Muslims now have to find a convincing explanation for their cowardice, which has also betrayed the freedom of expression of French Jews and Christians.
In Holland, this spinelessness has ended up as straight leftwing racism. The previously liberal Dutch establishment is now pushing an asylum policy so extreme even the Sun was moved to criticise it.
The line up that favours managed migration and diversity—Blunkett, McConnell, Livingstone, Bush and the Sun—share one quality that the PM should envy more than any other at present., they are all popular with the public. Maybe the government ought to pay more heed to this focus group than the ones that see scary foreigners on every street corner.
Perhaps we should also be creating an even more progressive immigration policy, for example offering easier admission to those who will bring their skills to the depopulated regions of the north. The Americans will next year offer more work permits to IT whizzkids from India than ever before; and before the middle of the century, the world’ s strongest economy will become its most ethnically diverse. Our own population is still over 92% white; we shouldn’t be duped by anxious faint-hearts into becoming an all-white backwater.
This passage is most probably part of ______.
选项
A、an ethnic study
B、a newspaper article
C、a government report
D、a research report
答案
B
解析
本文为报刊文章。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/hueO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Intheearlyperiod,Europeansettlersresortedtodeceitandevenwartodealwith______whoinhabitedtheAmericancontinent
WHYSHOULDanyonebuythelatestvolumeintheever-expandingDictionaryofNationalBiography?Idonotmeanthatitisbad,as
Ifpolicymakershopetomakefasterprogressinimprovingeconomicperformance,reducingpoverty,andslowing【M1】______
A、itsbeingmultinational.B、itssimultaneousoperation.C、itsmajorroleofheroinsupplier.D、itsmajorroleofcocainesuppli
Westerntattooistsworkwithaspecialelectricalinstrument,somethinglikeadentist’sdrill.Itholdsanumberofveryfinen
IagreetosomeextentwithmyimaginaryEnglishreader.Americanliteraryhistoriansareperhapspronetoviewtheirownnation
Sincethelate1970’s,inthefaceofaseverelossofmarketshareindozensofindustries,manufacturersintheUnitedStates
1WhenAmericahadanenergycrisis,ourleadersrespondedbycreatingtheDepartmentofEnergy.Whenweperceivedshortcomi
ThediscoveryoftheAntarcticnotonlyprovedoneofthemostinterestingofallgeographicaladventures,butcreatedwhatmigh
随机试题
分子伴侣可以协助蛋白质形成正确的空间构象,下列分子中不属于分子伴侣的是
2岁,男孩,因感冒2d伴发热入院,体检:39℃,脉搏130次/分,意识清楚,咽部充血,其余检查正常。在体检过程中,婴儿突然发呆,双眼上翻,出现四肢强直性、阵挛性运动。该患儿可能的诊断是()
医德评价中最普遍、最重要的一种方式是
患者突然昏仆,不省人事,口吐涎沫,喉中痰鸣,面色晦暗,苔白腻,脉滑,宜诊为()
上市公司在实施重大资产重组时,应该()。
甲公司与乙公司经协商达成买卖合同,双方均未加盖公章或签字,不久甲公司交货,乙公司收货后付款。一星期后,乙公司在使用中发现货物质量有问题,遂诉至法院,根据《合同法》规定,下列陈述正确的是()。
在健康照顾体系内实施的社会工作,目的是协助那些受到实际的和潜在的疾病、失能或伤害影响的服务对象、家庭和群体增强、促进、维持和恢复尽可能好的社会功能。这种社会工作是()。
()是职工民主管理的直接形式。
吸食、注射毒品成瘾人员是怀孕或者哺乳自己未满一周岁婴儿的妇女,或者患有某些严重疾病的,不宜收入强制戒毒所,应当限期在强制戒毒所外戒毒,由其()负责监督、管理。
Solvetheproblemandindicatethebestoftheanswerchoicesgiven.NUMBERS:Allnumbersusedarerealnumbers.FIGURES:
最新回复
(
0
)