首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In 1990, William Deresiewicz was on his way to gaining a Ph.D. in English literature at Columbia University. Describing that tim
In 1990, William Deresiewicz was on his way to gaining a Ph.D. in English literature at Columbia University. Describing that tim
admin
2016-10-21
58
问题
In 1990, William Deresiewicz was on his way to gaining a Ph.D. in English literature at Columbia University. Describing that time in the opening pages of his sharp, endearingly self-effacing new book, A Jane Austen Education, Deresiewicz explains that he faced one crucial obstacle. He loathed not just Jane Austen but the entire gang of 19th-century British novelists: Hardy, Dickens, Eliot ... the lot.
At 26, Deresiewicz wasn’t experiencing the hatred born of surfeit that Mark Twain described when he told a friend, " Every time I read Pride and Prejudice I want to dig her up and hit her over the skull with her own shinbone." What Deresiewicz was going through was the rebel phase in which Dostoyevsky rules Planet Gloom, that stage during which the best available image of marriage is a prison gate.
Sardonic students do not, as Deresiewicz points out, make suitable shrine-tenders for a female novelist whose books, while short on wedding scenes, never skimp on proposals. Emma Bovary fulfilled all the young scholar’s expectations of literary culture at its finest: Emma Woodhouse left him cold. " Her life," he lamented, " was impossibly narrow." Her story, such as it was, "seemed to consist of nothing more than a lot of chitchat among a bunch of commonplace characters in a country village." Hypochondriacal Mr. Woodhouse, garrulous Miss Bates — weren’t these just the sort of bores Deresiewicz had spent his college years struggling to avoid? Maybe, he describes himself conceding, the sole redeeming feature of smug Miss Woodhouse was that she seemed to share his distaste for the dull society of Highbury.
The state of outraged hostility is, of course, a setup. Many of Deresiewicz’s readers will already know him as the author of the widely admired Jane Austen and the Romantic Poets. One of the novelist’s most appreciative critics isn’t about to knock Austen off her plinth. Nevertheless, a profound truth lies embedded in Deresiewicz’s witty account of his early animosity. He applies that comic narrative device to her six completed novels. Considered so, each work reveals itself as a teaching tool in the painful journey toward becoming not only adult but useful.
The truth is that young readers don’t easily attach themselves to Austen. Mr. Darcy, " haughty as a Siamese cat" , isn’t half as appealing on the page as Colin Firth stalking across the screen in Andrew Davies’s liberty-taking film. Seventeen-year-old Catherine Morland seems coltish and naive to readers of her own age today, while Emma Woodhouse, all of 20, appears loud, vain and bossy. And who, at 27 or thereabouts, now feels sympathy for the meekness of Anne Elliot, a young woman who has allowed a monstrous father and a persuasive family friend to ruin her chances of happiness with the engaging Captain Wentworth?
Deresiewicz’s emphasis on Austen’s lack of appeal to young readers struck a chord. The memory still lingers of being taken to lunch by my father to meet a cultured man who might, it must have been hoped, exert a civilizing influence on a willful 20-year-old. We’d barely started on the appetizers before Jane Austen’s name came up. "I hate her," I announced, brandishing my scorn as a badge of pride. Invited to offer reasons, I prattled on, much like Deresiewicz’s younger self, about her dreary characters: all so banal, so unimportant. Glancing up for admiration, I caught an odd expression on our guest’s face, something between amusement and disgust. I carried right on. It was another five years before I comprehended the shameless depths of my arrogance. I had matched Emma — at her worst.
It happens that Emma at her worst is the turning point in Deresiewicz’s account of his own conversion. The fictional scene that taught him to understand the subtlety of Austen’s manipulation of the reader was the picnic at which Emma, cocksure as ever, orders gentle Miss Bates to restrict her utterance of platitudes during the meal. Miss Bates blushes painfully, and yet accepts the truth of Emma’s critique. The reader has no option but to admire, however grudgingly, such quiet humility.
Although he’s a shrewd critic of Austen’s work, Deresiewicz is less at ease when entering the genre of memoir. Girlfriends come and go: a controlling father is described without ever being quite brought to life: personal experiences of community in a Jewish youth movement are awkwardly yoked to the kindly naval group evoked by Austen in the Harville-Benwick household of Persuasion. Very occasionally, as in a startling passage that offers a real-life analogy to the socially ambitious Crawfords of Mansfield Park, a sentence leaps free of Deresiewicz’s selective recollections. "You guys are lunch meat now," a friend’s rich wife advises both him and her husband. "Wait a few years — you’ll be sirloin steak." Here, slicing up through the text like a knife blade, surfaces a statement to match Austen’s own scalpel-wielding.
Teaching became Deresiewicz’s chosen vocation. And Austen, he claims, taught him the difficult art of lecturing without being didactic, in just the way that Henry Tilney instructs a wide-eyed Catherine Morland — and that Austen herself lays down the law to her readers.
Rachel M. Brownstein’s Why Jane Austen? offers a different approach. Excellent in her overview of Austen’s ascent of the Olympian literary slope, Brownstein speaks down to her readers from an equally dizzy height. Pity the "smart, eloquent and clubbable" former pupil Brownstein names and thanks for having, at the end of the term, "helpfully clarified things by telling me what I had been saying." Ouch. Students, Brownstein loftily declares, are best introduced to Austen’s novels by being informed, for example, that the title "Mr. Knightley of Donwell Abbey" conceals the code words "knightly" and "donewell." No indication is given that this formidable tutor would embrace the collaborative observations from her pupils that Deresiewicz has learned to welcome and enjoy.
Brownstein remains, however, a superb critic, seen at her best when illuminating Austen’s mastery of significant detail — a quality, she reminds us, Walter Scott was quick to discern and praise. Exasperated though I was when Brownstein remarked mat partaking of the daily feasts at the Rockefeller Foundation’s Bellagio Center presented her with a "moral" obligation, I’d gladly forgive worse for the pleasure of learning how artfully Austen sows our mistrust of her nastier characters.
I have, however, one suggestion. Brownstein, almost as socially obsessed as her elegant scapegoat of choice, Lionel Trilling, dithers over exactly where to place Austen. Snobs, she declares, without much evidence, are among the novelist’s firmest fans. But Austen belonged neither to the aristocracy nor to the rising middle class. There’s no need for her to be pigeonholed, but if a place must be granted, how about "vicarage class" — for the position from which a parson’s clever daughter could observe the mannered comedy of all walks of life?
"Struck a chord" in the sixth paragraph is closest in meaning to______.
选项
A、bring back recollections
B、strike a straight line
C、play musical notes
D、identify with something
答案
D
解析
语义题。strike a chord在文中的意思是引起内心共鸣,只有D最为适合。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/hy7O777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
______tellsastoryaboutayoungAmericandefeatedbythestiff,traditionalvaluesofEurope.
Whenapidginlanguageisadoptedbyacommunityasitsprimarylanguage,itiscalled
Thequestionofwhetherwarisinevitableisonewhichhasconcernedmanygreatwriters.Beforeconsideringthequestion,itwi
ItusedtobesaidthatEnglishpeopletaketheirpleasuresadly.Nodoubtthiswouldstillbetrueiftheyhavehadanyple
Whatwillbetheimpactofaglobalcomputernetworkonculturalforms?Theconstructionofexclusiveinformationsocietieshas
Aestheticsisthatregioninthelandofsciencewhosebordersofinvestigationareknownasexperiencesofbeauty,andwhoses
______isthepoetrythathaseitheranirregularpatternornometricalpattern.
Virtuallyeverydayoftheyearseesanotherartbiennialopeningsomewhereintheworld.Theroleoftheseexhibitionsistosh
Imagineyou’reanemployer,lookingtohiremeforajob.YousubscribetoaWebsitethatgivesyoubackgroundinformation,and
PASSAGEFOURWhydoscientistsexaminethegenomesofastronauts?
随机试题
某糖果厂生产两种糖果,A种糖果每箱获利润40元,B种糖果每箱获利润50元,其生产过程分为混合、烹调、包装三道工序,下袁为每箱糖果生产过程中所需平均时间(单位:分钟)每种糖果的生产过程中,混合的设备至多能用12小时,烹调的设备至多能用30小时,包装的设备
竖井的井壁应是耐火极限不低于()的非燃烧体。
某农场拟于2006年初在某河流上游植树造林500公顷,需要各类投资共5000万元。农场将承包该林地并拟于2012年初择伐树木后,将林地无偿移交给地方政府。预计所伐木材销售净收入为每公顷12万元。由于流域水土得到保持,气候环境得到改善,预计流域内3万
社会主义核心价值体系是建设和谐文化的根本,它的基本内容包括()。
张某因犯罪被判处剥夺政治权利3年,在此期间,张某的下列行为中符合法律规定的是()。
党的十九大提出以党的政治建设为统领,全面推进党的政治建设、思想建设、组织建设、作风建设、纪律建设,把制度建设贯穿其中,并特别强调把党的政治建设摆在首位。党的政治建设的首要任务是()
嗅探器改变了网络接口的工作模式,使得网络接口____________。
有职工工资表(职工号、姓名、日期、基本工资、奖金、工资合计),其中“工资合计”等于同一行数据的“基本工资”与“奖金”之和,在职工工资表中插入一行数据时(设一次只插入一行数据)能实现自动计算“工资合计”列的值的代码是______。A)ALTERTABLE
下列叙述中正确的是
在标准ASCII编码表中,数字码、小写英文字母和大写英文字母的前后次序是()。
最新回复
(
0
)