2. 外语
  3. Community cancer dusters are viewed quite differently by citizen activists and by epidemiologists. Environmentalists and concern

Community cancer dusters are viewed quite differently by citizen activists and by epidemiologists. Environmentalists and concern

admin2013-10-17  33
问题     Community cancer dusters are viewed quite differently by citizen activists and by epidemiologists. Environmentalists and concerned local residents, for instance, might immediately suspect environmental radiation as the culprit when a high incidence of cancer cases occurs near a nuclear facility. Epidemiologists, in contrast, would be more likely to say that the incidences were "inconclusive" or the result of pure chance. And when a breast cancer survivor, Lorraine Pace, mapped 20 breast cancer cases occurring in her West Islip, Long Island, community, her rudimentary research efforts were guided more by hope—that a specific environmental agent could be correlated with the cancers—than by scientific method.
When epidemiologists study clusters of cancer cases and other noncontiguous conditions such as birth defects or miscarriage, they take several variables into account, such as background rate (the number of people affected in the general population) , duster size, and specificity (any notable characteristics of the individual affected in each case). If a cluster is both large and specific, it is easier for epidemiologists to assign blame. Not only must each variable be considered on its own, but it must also be combined with others. Lung cancer is very common in the general population. Yet when a huge number of cases turned up among World War II shipbuilders who had all worked with asbestos, the size of the cluster and the fact that the men had similar occupational asbestos exposures enabled epidemiologists to assign blame to the fibrous mineral.
    Although several known carcinogens have been discovered through these kinds of occupational or medical clusters, only one community cancer duster has ever been traced to an environmental cause. Health officials often discount a community’s suspicion of a common environmental cause because citizens tend to include cases that were diagnosed before the afflicted individuals moved into the neighborhood. Add to this is the problem of cancer’s latency. Unlike an infectious disease such as cholera, which is caused by a recent exposure to food or water contaminated with the cholera bacterium, cancer may have its roots in an exposure that occurred 10 to 20 years earlier.
    Do all these caveats mean that the hard work of Lorraine Pace and other community activists is for nothing? Not necessarily. Together with many other reports of breast cancer clusters on Long Island, the West Islip situation highlighted by Pace has helped epidemiologists lay the groundwork for a well-designed scientific study.
The passage suggests that the fact the "only one community cancer cluster had ever been traced to an environmental cause’ (Para. 3)is most likely due to the
选项 A、methodological difficulties in analyzing community cancer clusters
B、reluctance of epidemiologists to investigate environmental factors in cancer
C、lack of credibility of citizen activists in claiming to have identified cancer agents
D、effectiveness of regulations restricting the use of carcinogens in residential areas
答案A
解析 A意为：分析整个社会患癌症的群体方法上的困难。第三段指出，虽然几种致癌因素是通过这样的(指第二段提到的情况)职业或病理群体发现的，只有一种患癌群体被归因于环境所致。致癌的因素有很多，由于社会环境致癌所占的成分较小，而且癌症潜伏期较长，卫生部门经常忽略此原因，增加了分析引起癌症的原因上的困难。可见，这里强调了分析癌症发病原因的困难，指出有些人的分析方法不对，忽视了一些因素。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/hyXO777K
0

在职攻硕英语联考

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)