首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2016-12-06
84
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本文主要介绍的是美国法院在铁路公司伤害案中的裁决,因此D是最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/iCJK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Heistooshytoaskastrangerthetime,______speaktoaroomfullofpeople.
Youshouldn’thaveaskedtheboytorunacrossthestreettobuycigarettes;he______byapassingcar.
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
Whatdoes"Hisparentsaredeadagainstthetrip"mean?
Lastyear,Ipaidathree-dayvisittothecompanyasavisitingengineer,andwastreated______.
Acompanyhaslaunchedrevolutionarysoftwarefortrackingstolenmobilephonesthatisimpossibletoremovefromthedevice—eve
随机试题
焊条电弧焊的适用范围有哪些?有哪些特点?
关于脉络膜黑色素瘤,下列哪项是错误的
某工厂以对二甲苯为原料,生产精对苯二甲酸(PTA),年产量为60万t。生产过程主要由氧化和精制两部分组成。氧化反应以对二甲苯为原料,乙酸为溶剂,乙酸钴和乙酸锰为催化剂,溴化物为促进剂,在一定压力和温度的条件下,通入压缩空气使其发生氧化反应。对二甲苯氧化过程
()不属于已上市流通股份。
下列各项中能体现出风险管理带来的效益的有()。
导游人员的计分管理制度是在()中确定。
对中国古代文化知识的解释,正确的有()。
在Word中,()用于控制文档在屏幕上的显示大小。
根据文意,对“决策”的含义解释最恰当的一项是:根据文意,“传统决策观念”与“现代决策观念”的根本区别是:
计算二重积分,其中D是由直线y=x,y=1,x=0所围成的平面区域.
最新回复
(
0
)