首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2016-12-06
45
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本文主要介绍的是美国法院在铁路公司伤害案中的裁决,因此D是最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/iCJK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Thereoughttobelessanxietyovertheperceivedriskofmountainclimbingthan______inthepublicmindtoday.
Doctorsareinterestedinusinglasersasasurgicaltoolinoperationsonpeoplewhoare______toheartattack.
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
You______Johninthestreetthismorning.He’sbeendeadforages.
Lastyear,Ipaidathree-dayvisittothecompanyasavisitingengineer,andwastreated______.
Acompanyhaslaunchedrevolutionarysoftwarefortrackingstolenmobilephonesthatisimpossibletoremovefromthedevice—eve
Acompanyhaslaunchedrevolutionarysoftwarefortrackingstolenmobilephonesthatisimpossibletoremovefromthedevice—eve
Acompanyhaslaunchedrevolutionarysoftwarefortrackingstolenmobilephonesthatisimpossibletoremovefromthedevice—eve
随机试题
汽水膨胀是直流锅炉不可避免的现象。()
态度的针对性是指任何一种态度都有其相对应的特定对象,这一特性也表明态度的()
下列选项中,关于尖锐湿疣的说法,正确的是
属于医疗事故赔偿的,残疾生活补助费根据伤残等级,按照医疗事故发生地居民年平均生活费计算,自定残之月起最长赔偿
甲忘带家门钥匙,邻居乙建议甲从自家阳台攀爬到甲家,并提供绳索以备不测,丙、丁在场协助固定绳索。甲在攀越时绳索断裂,从三楼坠地致重伤。各方当事人就赔偿事宜未达成一致,甲诉至法院。下列说法错误的是()。
()是运动动机的四大功能。
在死刑缓期执行期间,如果()的,二年期满以后,减为无期徒刑。
下面是一组关于文明发展的材料:材料1美国学者亨廷顿提出“文明冲突论”,认为21世纪是文明冲突的世纪,文明的冲突将代替经济、政治的冲突,成为冲突的主要形式。特别是基督教文明与伊斯兰文明会发生冲突,如果伊斯兰文明与儒家文明联合起来,西方基督教文明将会有灭
ThedifferencebetweenmenandwomenshoppersShoppingforclothesisnotthesameexperienceforamanasitisforwoman.Ama
Duringthepastgeneration,theAmericanmiddle-classfamilythatoncecouldcountonhardworkandfairplaytokeepitselffin
最新回复
(
0
)