首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2016-12-06
56
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本文主要介绍的是美国法院在铁路公司伤害案中的裁决,因此D是最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/iCJK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
MostChinesepeoplewenttoworkbybikewithinliving______
Thereoughttobelessanxietyovertheperceivedriskofmountainclimbingthan______inthepublicmindtoday.
Veryfewpeoplecouldunderstandthelecturetheprofessordeliveredbecauseitssubjectwasvery______.
Itisunfortunatethatthemembersofthecommitteedonot______inopinion.
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
Fortheadvertisedposition,thecompanyoffersa(n)______salaryandbenefitspackage.
Forthesuccessoftheproject,thecompanyshould______themostoftheopportunitiesathand.
Acompanyhaslaunchedrevolutionarysoftwarefortrackingstolenmobilephonesthatisimpossibletoremovefromthedevice—eve
Acompanyhaslaunchedrevolutionarysoftwarefortrackingstolenmobilephonesthatisimpossibletoremovefromthedevice—eve
随机试题
梗死是指
假设某企业执行企业会计制度,备用金采用非定额备用金核算;10月该企业发生如下业务:(1)为备发工资从银行提取现金100000元。(2)企业职工甲借款1000元。(3)采购员乙出差归来,报销差旅费1500元,预借差旅费2000元,余款500元退回财务部
下列关于调整现值法的说法正确的有()。
通用化是指在相互独立的系统中,选择和确定()的子系统或功能单元的标准化形式。
某公司拟招聘两名工作人员,表1是人力资源部通过笔试进行初选之后,对所挑选出来的甲、乙、丙、丁四名候选人进行综合素质测评的得分,以及A和B两类岗位素质测评指标的权重。请根据表1的数据,分别为A和B两类岗位各提出1名最终候选人。
1,1,9,27,25,()。
阅读材料回答下列题:国内常听说“越是民族的,就越是世界的”这样一种说法。这应该是指文化的价值体现在它的独特性、与其他文化的差异性上,倘若雷同,文化就失去了它的基本存在价值。然而,当我们认识到文化的价值在于其独特性、差异性之后,我们如果仅
时间感知扭曲是指对时间不正确的知觉。在生活中,受各种因素影响,人们对时间的感知往往会不符合实际,有时候觉得时间过长,有时候觉得时间太短。许多原因都可以造成时间感知扭曲,现实中一场糟糕的表演会让人如坐针毡、觉得终场遥遥无期,与此相反的是,人们对于美好愉快的时
说起猥亵,很多人会将受害对象默认为女性。但现实中,男性遭遇性侵害的问题已是频发,而非自愿的性行为或猥亵,同样会给男性受害者带来巨大的精神伤害,这绝不能以泛娱乐化心态去看待。遗憾的是,在先前的刑法中,强奸罪犯罪对象只限于女性,而“猥亵罪”的犯罪对象只限于女性
"Down-to-earth"meanssomeoneorsomethingthatishonest,realisticandeasytodealwith.Itisapleasuretofind【C1】______wh
最新回复
(
0
)