首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2016-12-06
51
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本文主要介绍的是美国法院在铁路公司伤害案中的裁决,因此D是最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/iCJK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
MostChinesepeoplewenttoworkbybikewithinliving______
Thereoughttobelessanxietyovertheperceivedriskofmountainclimbingthan______inthepublicmindtoday.
Heistooshytoaskastrangerthetime,______speaktoaroomfullofpeople.
Doctorsareinterestedinusinglasersasasurgicaltoolinoperationsonpeoplewhoare______toheartattack.
Thegovernment______apublicdebateonthefuturedirectionoftheofficialsportspolicy.
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
Sheansweredwithan______"No"totherequestthatsheattendthepublichearing.
Thereceptionwasattendedby______membersofthelocalcommunity.
随机试题
放水阀的作用是进行检修或更换喷头时放空阀后管网余水。()
脑出血与脑梗死的CT表现相似是在
维生素C可使尿糖检测
产品组合的类型有()、()、()、()、()。
当消费函数为C=α+βY,α,β>0,这表明,平均消费倾向()。
根据车船税的征收管理,下列表述正确的有()。
央视《全球资讯榜》栏目有段广告:每天,我们只给你介绍三位全球热门人物;只报道最受关注的全球要闻事件;只评选出全球五大上榜公司;只发布全球最新的财经新闻;只介绍最具有想象力的前沿科技——《全球资讯榜》,中央电视台经济频道,每天中午12:00。知讯者生存。对
某市出租车的计费方式如下:路程在2公里以内(含2公里)为8元;达到2公里后,每增加1公里收费1.9元;达到8公里后,每增加1公里收费2.1元,增加不足1公里时按四舍五入计算。某乘客乘坐这种出租车交了44.6元车费,则该乘客乘坐此出租车行驶的路程为(
某超市仓储管理员甲利用职务便利配制了仓库的钥匙,其后甲将该钥匙交给乙,并且告诉乙仓库的位置和名贵化妆品所在位置,还要求乙盗窃销赃后要“感谢”他。乙成功盗窃名贵化妆品价值4万元,销赃后送给甲1万元。对于甲、乙行为的定性表述正确的是()。
AGuidetoEatingforSportsThereisapieceofgoodnewsthateatingtoreachyourpeakperformancelevellikelydoesn’tr
最新回复
(
0
)