首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40 which are based on Reading Passage 3 below. THE INGENUITY GAP Ingenuity, as
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40 which are based on Reading Passage 3 below. THE INGENUITY GAP Ingenuity, as
admin
2015-05-04
23
问题
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 27-40 which are based on Reading Passage 3 below.
THE INGENUITY GAP
Ingenuity, as I define it here, consists not only of ideas for new technologies like computers or drought-resistant crops but, more fundamentally, of ideas for better institutions and social arrangements, like efficient markets and competent governments.
How much and what kinds of ingenuity a society requires depends on a range of factors, including the society’s goals and the circumstances within which it must achieve those goals—whether it has a young population or an aging one, an abundance of natural resources or a scarcity of them, an easy climate or a punishing one, whatever the case may be.
How much and what kinds of ingenuity a society supplies also depends on many factors, such as the nature of human inventiveness and understanding, the rewards an economy gives to the producers of useful knowledge, and the strength of political opposition to social and institutional reforms.
A good supply of the right kind of ingenuity is essential, but it isn’t, of course, enough by itself. We know that the creation of wealth, for example, depends not only on an adequate supply of useful ideas but also on the availability of other, more conventional factors of production, like capital and labor. Similarly, prosperity, stability and justice usually depend on the resolution, or at least the containment, of major political struggles over wealth and power. Yet within our economies ingenuity often supplants labor, and growth in the stock of physical plant is usually accompanied by growth in the stock of ingenuity. And in our political systems, we need great ingenuity to set up institutions that successfully manage struggles over wealth and power. Clearly, our economic and political processes are intimately entangled with the production and use of ingenuity.
The past century’s coundess incremental changes in our societies around the planet, in our technologies and our interactions with our surrounding natural environments, have accumulated to create a qualitatively new world. Because these changes have accumulated slowly, it’s often hard for us to recognize how profound and sweeping they’ve been. They include far larger and denser populations; much higher per capita consumption of natural resources; and far better and more widely available technologies for the movement of people, materials, and especially information.
In combination, these changes have sharply increased the density, intensity, and pace of our interactions with each other; they have greatly increased the burden we place on our natural environment; and they have helped shift power from national and international institutions to individuals and subgroups, such as political special interests and ethnic factions.
As a result, people in all walks of life—from our political and business leaders to all of us in our day-to-day—must cope with much more complex, urgent, and often unpredictable circumstances. The management of our relationship with this new world requires immense and ever-increasing amounts of social and technical ingenuity. As we strive to maintain or increase our prosperity and improve the quality of our lives, we must make far more sophisticated decisions, and in less time, than ever before.
When we enhance the performance of any system, from our cars to the planet’s network of financial institutions, we tend to make it more complex. Many of the natural systems critical to our well-being, like the global climate and the oceans, are extraordinarily complex to begin with. We often can’t predict or manage the behavior of complex systems with much precision, because they are often very sensitive to the smallest of changes and perturbations, and their behavior can flip from one mode to another suddenly and dramatically. In general, as the human-made and natural systems we depend upon become more complex, and as our demands on them increase, the institutions and technologies we use to manage them must become more complex too, which further boosts our need for ingenuity.
The good news, though, is that the last century’s stunning changes in our societies and technologies have not just increased our need for ingenuity; they have also produced a huge increase in its supply. The growth and urbanization of human populations have combined with astonishing new communication and transportation technologies to expand interactions among people and produce larger, more integrated, and more efficient markets. These changes have, in turn, vastly accelerated the generation and delivery of useful ideas.
But—and this is the critical "but"—we should not jump to the conclusion that the supply of ingenuity always increases in lockstep with our ingenuity requirement: while it’s true that necessity is often the mother of invention, we can’t always rely on the right kind of ingenuity appearing when and where we need it. In many cases, the complexity and speed of operation of today’s vital economic, social, and ecological systems exceed the human brain’s grasp. Very few of us have more than a rudimentary understanding of how these systems work. They remain fraught with countless "unknown unknowns," which makes it hard to supply the ingenuity we need to solve problems associated with these systems.
In this book, I explore a wide range of other factors that will limit our ability to supply the ingenuity required in the coming century. For example, many people believe that new communication technologies strengthen democracy and will make it easier to find solutions to our societies’ collective problems, but the story is less clear than it seems. The crush of information in our everyday lives is shortening our attention span, limiting the time we have to reflect on critical matters of public policy, and making policy arguments more superficial.
Modern markets and science are an important part of the story of how we supply ingenuity. Markets are critically important, because they give entrepreneurs an incentive to produce knowledge. As for science, although it seems to face no theoretical limits, at least in the foreseeable future, practical constraints often slow its progress. The cost of scientific research tends to increase as it delves deeper into nature. And science’s rate of advance depends on the characteristic of the natural phenomena it investigates, simply because some phenomena are intrinsically harder to understand than others, so the production of useful new knowledge in these areas can be very slow. Consequendy, there is often a critical time lag between the recognition between a problem and the delivery of sufficient ingenuity, in the form of technologies, to solve that problem. Progress in the social sciences is especially slow, for reasons we don’t yet understand; but we desperately need better social scientific knowledge to build the sophisticated institutions today’s world demands.
Questions 27-30
Complete each sentence with the appropriate answer, A, B, C, or D. Write the correct answer in boxes 27-30 on your answer sheet.
A depends on many factors including climate.
B depends on the management and solution of disputes.
C is not only of technological advance, but more of institutional renovation.
D also depends on the availability of some traditional resources.
The definition of ingenuity
选项
答案
C
解析
利用顺序性原则很容易定位于原文开头第一段“Ingenuity,as I define it here,consistsnot only of ideas for new technologies…but,more fundamentally,of ideas for better institu—tions and social arrangements…”。选项C很明显与此内容直接对应,所以正确答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/iMNO777K
本试题收录于:
雅思阅读题库雅思(IELTS)分类
0
雅思阅读
雅思(IELTS)
相关试题推荐
African-Americanfilmmakersshouldbeinanenviableposition,forsincetheearly1990stherehasbeenasteadywaveof
Onereasonwhyasheep,alesswell-understoodexperimentalsubjectthanthelaboratorymouse,shouldhaveprovedeasier
Theword"civilization"wasjustcomingintouseinthe18thcentury,inFrenchandinEnglish,whenconservativemenofletters
Wemustlearnto______sentencesandtoanalyzethegrammarofourtext,forthereisno______tothegrammarofpoetry,tothene
WhetherthelanguagesoftheancientAmericanpeopleswereusedforexpressingabstractuniversalconceptscanbeclearlyanswer
WhetherthelanguagesoftheancientAmericanpeopleswereusedforexpressingabstractuniversalconceptscanbeclearlyanswer
Governmentofficialsauthorized______becausetheywanttohaveacompleteenumerationofthecountry’spopulation.
Althoughmanyofthestudentshadfoundtheassignment______Harrisoncompleteditwithease.
随机试题
人们描述所希望的居住社区环境使用最多的词汇是_______。
星形拓扑结构的优点和缺点是什么?
A.生理盲点扩大B.中心注视点至生理盲点之间的暗点呈椭圆形C.致密的旁中心暗点或中心暗点D.与生理盲点相连的水平性半盲E.各种视野缺损均可表现后段缺血性视神经病变的视野损害特征是
相位编码可导致相位编码方向上的像素
诊断邻面龋最准确的方法是
与人参相反的药物是
国家实行一级政府一级预算,设立中央,省、自治区、直辖市,设区的市、自治州,县、自治县、不设区的市、市辖区,乡、民族乡、镇五级预算。()
政府失效也称政府失灵,是指政府在为弥补市场失灵而对经济、社会生活进行干预的过程中,由于政府行为自身的局限性和其他客观因素的制约而产生的新的缺陷,进而无法使社会资源配置效率达到最佳的情景。以下不属于政府失效表现的是()。
国家是用边界围起来的政治实体,是国家政权行使权力的区域,可以看作一种政治区划。但是这种边界围起来的政治区划,只是国家的形式,并不是国家的本质,真正的国家是指边界之内的国民已经形成了一种“凝聚力”,这种凝聚力可以称为“国家意识”,就是大家都在内心深处认为我是
已知f’(2)=-1,则=().
最新回复
(
0
)