首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
How’s this for a cynical view of science? (46)"A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making th
How’s this for a cynical view of science? (46)"A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making th
admin
2012-07-06
82
问题
How’s this for a cynical view of science? (46)
"A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. "
Scientific truth, according to this view, is established less by the noble use of reason than by the stubborn exertion of will. One hopes that the Nobel Prize-winning physicist Max Planck, the author of the quotation above, was writing in an unusually dark moment.
(47)
And yet a large body of psychological data supports Planck’s view; we humans quickly develop an irrational loyalty to our beliefs, and work hard to find evidence that supports those opinions and to discredit, discount or avoid information that does not.
In the laboratory, this is labeled confirmation bias; observed in the real world, it’s known as pigheadedness. Scientists are not immune. In an experiment, psychologists were asked to review a paper submitted for journal publication in their field. They rated the paper’s methodology, data presentation and scientific contribution significantly more favorably when the paper happened to offer results consistent with their own theoretical stance. Identical research methods prompted a very different response in those whose scientific opinion was challenged.
This is a worry. Doesn’t the ideal of scientific reasoning call for pure, dispassionate curiosity? Doesn’t it positively shun the ego-driven desire to prevail over our critics and the prejudicial urge to support our social values? Perhaps not. (48)
Some academics have recently suggested that a scientist’s pigheadedness and social prejudices can peacefully coexist with — and may even facilitate — the pursuit of scientific knowledge.
Let’s take pigheadedness first. (49)
In a much discussed article this year in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, the cognitive scientists Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber argue that our reasoning skills are really not as dismal as they seem.
They don’t deny that irrationalities like the confirmation bias are common. Instead, they suggest that we stop thinking of the primary function of reasoning as being to improve knowledge and make better decisions. Reasoning, they claim, is for winning arguments. And an irrational tendency like pigheadedness can be quite an asset in an argumentative context.
And what about scientists’ prejudices? Clearly, social values should never count as evidence for or against a particular hypothesis. However, the philosopher of science Heather Douglas has argued that social values can safely play an indirect role in scientific reasoning. Consider: The greater we judge the social costs of a potential scientific error, the higher the standard of evidence we will demand. Deciding which are the "better" criteria or the "better" background assumptions is not, Ms. Douglas argues, solely a scientific issue. It also depends on the social values you bring to bear on the research.
For all its imperfections, science continues to be a stunning success. (50)
Yet maybe progress would be even faster and smoother if scientists would admit, and even embrace, their humanity.
[487 words]
选项
答案
最近有些学者提出,科学家的固执及其社会偏见可以与追求科学真理和平共处,甚至可以为其加把劲。
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/iMp4777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Inthefirstparagraph,theauthormentionsMcKendrickandPlumbmostprobablyinorderto_______.Accordingtothepassage,a
WirelesstechnologyisintroducedasFromtheauthor’spointofview,theWi-Fitechnology
WhatdoNationalSemiconductor,MaxwellHouseCoffee,DeloitteTouche,andHearstMagazineshaveincommon?Alltheseorganizati
WhatdoNationalSemiconductor,MaxwellHouseCoffee,DeloitteTouche,andHearstMagazineshaveincommon?Alltheseorganizati
WecanlearnfromthefirstparagraphthatBy"outragedrhetoric"(Paragraph3),theauthoristalkingabout
The20thcenturymayhavebeentheageofscientificadvancementbut,asthenewmillenniumbegins,(1)_____worldhealththepr
The20thcenturymayhavebeentheageofscientificadvancementbut,asthenewmillenniumbegins,(1)_____worldhealththepr
The20thcenturymayhavebeentheageofscientificadvancementbut,asthenewmillenniumbegins,(1)_____worldhealththepr
随机试题
A.生物性致病因素B.理化性致病因素C.先天性致病因素D.遗传性致病因素E.免疫性致病因素基因突变属于()。
(2019年滕州)教育法规执行必须遵循以人为本的基本原则。()
试述善言灵巧型谈判对手的性格特征及应对策略。
质量控制的基本原理是运用(),进行质量的事前预控、事中控制和事后纠偏控制。
在无权代理的情况下,第三人有足够的理由相信该代理人具有代理权的,其代理行为()。
日本驻华商社的工作人员中村策划、参与了国内犯罪分子走私犯罪活动,对中村的刑事责任问题,要通过外交途径解决。()
该省博物馆个数占文物事业机构数目的比重比上年()。综合类博物馆、历史类博物馆、艺术类博物馆之外的其他博物馆的平均人员数量比上年()。
下列各句中有语病的一句是( )
较普遍的假设认为,当一位慷慨的赞助人捐赠了有潜力的展品时,博物馆得到了财政上的支持。但是在事实上,捐赠物品需要贮藏空间,那不会是免费的,还需要非常昂贵的日常维护。所以,这些赠品加剧而非减轻了对博物馆财政资源的需求。下面哪个选项,如果正确,最严重地削弱了以上
WelcometotheGatewayArchTicketsavailableatticketwindows.Advancereservationsforlargegroupsandstudentfaresare
最新回复
(
0
)