首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-11-28
65
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate — or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very long wave lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible , but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic — or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the government, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
What do you think ordinary citizens may do after reading the different arguments?
选项
A、They are indifferent.
B、They are very worried.
C、The may exercise prudent avoidance.
D、They are shocked.
答案
C
解析
推理判断题。第一段第四句指出,电磁场与疾病有关的暗示让人不安,因为我们每个人都与这种磁场存在联系,比如使用电器、电线、天线、电脑和微波炉都会产生磁场。由此可推断,普通人在读了这篇文章后,可能会担心自己所使用的电器会导致疾病,从而会注意减少对电器的使用,故答案为[C]项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/iaua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
转基因作物
ItamazesmeeverytimeIencountersuperstitionsoroldwives’talesthatgetinthewayofgoodthingshappening,eventhough
Althoughbasedonanactualevent,thefilmlacks______:thedirectorshufflesevents,simplifiesthetangleofrelationships,
Fromcavepaintingsandfrom______onboneandreindeerhorn,itisknownthatprehistorichumanswerecloseobserversofnatur
Althoughthemodellooksgoodonthesurface,itwillnotbearclose______.
AimlessnesshashardlybeentypicalofthepostwarJapanwhoseproductivityandsocialharmonyaretheenvyoftheUnitedSta
Inthenextfewweeksconsumerspendingwillincreaseby7%inAmerica,______withlastyear,accordingtoaconsumersurveyby
Whilethishealthylifestyleapproachtohealthworkedforsome(thewealthymembersofsociety),peopleexperiencingpoverty,
Theinkhadfadedwithtime,andsopartsoftheletterwere______.
AlthougheconomictiesbetweenmostAsia-Pacificeconomieshavenotyetsufferedanyfundamentaldamage.
随机试题
关于胃的淋巴结分组,位于肝十二指肠韧带内的淋巴结应属
血瘀型月经过多的首选方是
A、薄荷B、荆芥C、益母草D、广藿香E、穿心莲主含生物碱的药材是()
与药物的药理作用和剂量无关的反应是
患者口述3年前腰部受过伤,最近天气变冷,腰部开始疼痛加剧。就诊时发现腰肌痉挛,腰部活动受限。舌偏暗红,苔白腻,脉濡细或涩。下列说法正确的是()
A.无臭味的黄色稠厚脓痰B.脓液稀薄。呈淡红色,量较多C.脓液稠厚有粪臭味D.脓液呈淡绿色,有甜腥味E.脓液有腐臭味脆弱拟杆菌感染时
移粱用的滚筒,其直径的大小与牵引力成( ),直径( ),则所需牵引力( )。
下列选项中不属于现代教学方法发展趋势的是()
定义:①初级群体:指成员之间彼此熟悉、了解,人际关系密切,具有较浓厚感情色彩的群体。②次级群体:指其成员为了某种特定的目标集合在一起,通过明确的规章制度结成正规关系的社会群体。③敌人:互相仇恨而敌对的人或敌对的方面。典型例证:(1)在同一个公司同
下列描述中正确的是
最新回复
(
0
)