首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-11-28
70
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate — or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very long wave lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible , but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic — or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the government, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
What do you think ordinary citizens may do after reading the different arguments?
选项
A、They are indifferent.
B、They are very worried.
C、The may exercise prudent avoidance.
D、They are shocked.
答案
C
解析
推理判断题。第一段第四句指出,电磁场与疾病有关的暗示让人不安,因为我们每个人都与这种磁场存在联系,比如使用电器、电线、天线、电脑和微波炉都会产生磁场。由此可推断,普通人在读了这篇文章后,可能会担心自己所使用的电器会导致疾病,从而会注意减少对电器的使用,故答案为[C]项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/iaua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
RichardNixonresignedin1974becauseof________.
()alwaysused"i"insteadof"I"torefertohimselfasaprotestagainstself-importance.
Shehadastrong______togiveatalkaboutherexperiences,becauseshedidn’tlikethelimelight.
The______ofsmokingamongwomen,formerlynegligible,hasgrowntosuchadegreethatlungcancerhasbecomethechiefcauser
Inourhighlytechnologicalsociety,thenumberofjobsforunskilledworkersis______
"Howmanycopiesdoyouwantprinted,Mr.Greeley?""Fivethousand!"Theanswerwassnappedbackwithouthesitation."But,
Wedidholdameetingyesterday,butyou______,sowedidnotinformyou.
Theproliferationofweaponsofmassdestructionwillnotbestoppedby______,norwillterrorismbeendedbytheincarceration
The______ofsmokingamongwomen,formerlynegligible,hasgrowntosuchadegreethatlungcancerhasbecomethechiefcauser
Ifanydamagetothegoodsoccurs,aclaimmay______theinsuranceagentatyourend,whowillundertaketocompensateyoufort
随机试题
被评估机组为3年前购置,账面价值为20万元人民币,评估时该类型机组已不再生产,被新型机组所取代。经调查和咨询了解到,在评估时点,其他企业购置新型机组的报价为30万元人民币(实际交易价格一般为报价的90%),专家认定被评估机组因功能落后其贬值额约占新型机组取
下列对蜘蛛痣的描述,不准确的是【】
下列哪项能刺激远端小管和集合管主细胞分泌K+
干下型室间隔缺损,左向右分流,用超声检测,要了解其峰值跨隔压差,应检测
社会主义市场经济本质是()。
《建设工程施工合同(示范文本)》规定,承包商递交索赔报告28天后,工程师未对此索赔要求作出任何表示,则应视为()。
各个单位的会计科目是完全不能增减设置的。()
某企业对生产线进行扩建。该生产线原价为1000万元,已提折旧300万元。扩建生产线时发生扩建支出800万元,同时在扩建时处理废料发生变价收入50万元。该生产线新的入账价值应为()万元。
下列案件中,不适用简易程序的有()。
Directions:Inthefollowingtypeofquestion,twoquantitiesappear,oneinColumnAandoneinColumnB.Youmustcomparethem
最新回复
(
0
)