首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday—a modest policy victory for the
On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday—a modest policy victory for the
admin
2021-01-06
34
问题
On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday—a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration. But on the more important matter of the Constitution, the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.
In Arizona v. United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law. The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to "establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization" and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial. Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.
Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun. On the overturned provisions the majority held the Congress had deliber-ately "occupied the field" and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.
However, the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement. That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.
Two of the three objecting Justices—Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas—agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute. The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia, who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.
The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as "a shocking assertion of federal executive power". The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities, even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter. In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.
Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them. But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could. It never did so. The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.
Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they
选项
A、deprived the federal police of Constitutional powers.
B、disturbed the power balance between different states.
C、overstepped the authority of federal immigration law.
D、contradicted both the federal and state policies.
答案
C
解析
事实细节题。principles that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial are noncontroversial.说明联邦法律高于州的法律是无可争辩的。答案选项they“overstepped the authority of federal immigration law.”一一它们(亚利桑那州的法案)逾越了联邦法案。这是对文中这句话的反义改写。Over—step同义替换原文中的intrude,authority同义替换了privileged powers。属于同义置换。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ij1Z777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Everyhumanbeinghasuniquearrangementofskinonhisfingersandthisarrangementisunchangeable.Scientistsandexpertshav
Theideathatpeoplemightbechosenorrejectedforjobsonthebasisoftheirgenesdisturbsmany.Such【C1】______mayhowever,
Theideathatpeoplemightbechosenorrejectedforjobsonthebasisoftheirgenesdisturbsmany.Such【C1】______mayhowever,
Theideathatpeoplemightbechosenorrejectedforjobsonthebasisoftheirgenesdisturbsmany.Such【C1】______mayhowever,
Ifitwereonlynecessarytodecidewhethertoteachelementarysciencetoeveryoneonamassbasisortofindthegiftedfewan
Ifitwereonlynecessarytodecidewhethertoteachelementarysciencetoeveryoneonamassbasisortofindthegiftedfewan
Overhalftheworld’speoplenowliveincities.Thelatest"GlobalReportonHumanSettlements"saysasignificantchangetookp
Valentine’sDaymaycomefromtheancientRomanfeastofLupercalia.【C1】______thefiercewolvesroamednearby,theoldRomans
Valentine’sDaymaycomefromtheancientRomanfeastofLupercalia.【C1】______thefiercewolvesroamednearby,theoldRomans
Forthefirsttimeinhistorymorepeopleliveintownsthaninthecountry.InBritainthishashadacuriousresult.Whilepol
随机试题
决定皮肤外用药物临床疗效的关键因素是
在腺样囊性癌按病理表现分的三型中,可见到双层细胞腺样结构的是
患者妊娠期5个月,咳嗽1月余,未愈,痰液黄稠,面红口干。诊断为
某市混凝土公司新建临时搅拌站,在试运行期间通过暗管将污水直接排放到周边,严重破坏当地环境。公司经理还指派员工潜入当地环境监测站内,用棉纱堵塞空气采集器,造成自动监测数据多次出现异常。有关部门对其处罚后,公司生产经营发生严重困难,拟裁员20人以上。关于该临时
当线状地物宽度宽窄变化大于(),形成不同宽度的线状地物时,须分别量测线状地物宽度。
电量预测的常用方法中,()适用于分区负荷中的一般负荷和点负荷预测,但预测期以近、中期较为合适。
根据支付结算法律制度的规定,预算单位零余额账户可以()。
盒子中有10个球,6个红球和4个黑球。无放回随机选出4个球。计算选出球中包含黑球数的期望和方差。[中央财经大学2012研]
A.条件(1)充分,但条件(2)不充分.B.条件(2)充分,但条件(1)不充分.C.条件(1)和条件(2)单独都不充分,但联合起来充分.D.条件(1)充分,条件(2)也充分.E.条件(1)和条件(2)单独都不充分,联合起来也不充分.可以确定直线
Inthefollowingessay,eachblankhasfourchoices.Choosethebestanswerandwritedownontheanswersheet.Inlow-spee
最新回复
(
0
)