首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday—a modest policy victory for the
On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday—a modest policy victory for the
admin
2021-01-06
36
问题
On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday—a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration. But on the more important matter of the Constitution, the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.
In Arizona v. United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law. The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to "establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization" and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial. Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.
Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun. On the overturned provisions the majority held the Congress had deliber-ately "occupied the field" and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.
However, the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement. That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.
Two of the three objecting Justices—Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas—agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute. The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia, who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.
The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as "a shocking assertion of federal executive power". The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities, even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter. In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.
Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them. But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could. It never did so. The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.
Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they
选项
A、deprived the federal police of Constitutional powers.
B、disturbed the power balance between different states.
C、overstepped the authority of federal immigration law.
D、contradicted both the federal and state policies.
答案
C
解析
事实细节题。principles that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial are noncontroversial.说明联邦法律高于州的法律是无可争辩的。答案选项they“overstepped the authority of federal immigration law.”一一它们(亚利桑那州的法案)逾越了联邦法案。这是对文中这句话的反义改写。Over—step同义替换原文中的intrude,authority同义替换了privileged powers。属于同义置换。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ij1Z777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Everyhumanbeinghasuniquearrangementofskinonhisfingersandthisarrangementisunchangeable.Scientistsandexpertshav
Everyhumanbeinghasuniquearrangementofskinonhisfingersandthisarrangementisunchangeable.Scientistsandexpertshav
Theideathatpeoplemightbechosenorrejectedforjobsonthebasisoftheirgenesdisturbsmany.Such【C1】______mayhowever,
Overhalftheworld’speoplenowliveincities.Thelatest"GlobalReportonHumanSettlements"saysasignificantchangetookp
Overhalftheworld’speoplenowliveincities.Thelatest"GlobalReportonHumanSettlements"saysasignificantchangetookp
"THESERVANT"(1963)isoneofthosefilmsthatitisimpossibletoforget.Theservantexploitshismaster’sweaknessesuntilhe
JusthowmuchdoestheConstitutionprotectyourdigitaldata?TheSupremeCourtwillnowconsiderwhetherpolicecansearchthe
TheUS$3-millionFundamentalPhysicsPrizeisindeedaninterestingexperiment,asAlexanderPolyakovsaidwhenheacceptedt
In1924America’sNationalResearchCouncilsenttwoengineerstosuperviseaseriesofexperimentsatatelephone-partsfactory
随机试题
邓小平强调要聚精会神地抓党的建设,提出了加强党的制度建设的一系列方针原则,指出领导制度、组织制度问题更带有()
下列措施与被检者的X线防护无关的是
A、钳夹止血B、结扎止血C、温热盐水纱布压迫止血D、骨蜡填充压迫止血E、药物止血知名血管破裂的终极止血方法是
A.上消化道钡餐造影B.小肠导管造影C.钡剂灌肠D.腹部透视E.断层摄影胃溃疡应做的检查是
女性,35岁,诊断为风湿性心脏病、重度二尖瓣狭窄,突发心悸、呼吸困难,咳粉红色泡沫痰。查体:BP90/70mmHg,端坐呼吸,双肺满布湿啰音,心率155次/分,第一心音强弱不等,节律不齐。给予毛花苷C0.4mg静脉注射,目的是
()是指个人对外贸易经营者、个体工商户按照规定开立的用以办理经常项目项下经营性外汇收支的账户。
关于职业化,正确的说法是()。
阅读下面材料,并回答问题:材料1:4岁的玛丽和爸爸的电话交谈父亲:玛丽,妈妈在家吗?玛丽:(不说话,点头)父亲:玛丽,我可以和妈妈说话吗?玛丽:(再次不语点头)材料2:16岁的萨布丽娜的早晨某个
某罪的法定刑为“3年以上10年以下有期徒刑”,下列说法正确的是()。
Bytheearly1950s,somebusinesspeoplebegantorecognizethatefficientproductionandextensivepromotiondidnotguarantee
最新回复
(
0
)