首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The End of AIDS? [A] On June 5th 1981 America’s Centres for Disease Control and Prevention reported the outbreak of an unusual f
The End of AIDS? [A] On June 5th 1981 America’s Centres for Disease Control and Prevention reported the outbreak of an unusual f
admin
2017-12-08
30
问题
The End of AIDS?
[A] On June 5th 1981 America’s Centres for Disease Control and Prevention reported the outbreak of an unusual form of pneumonia (肺炎) in Los Angeles. When, a few weeks later, its scientists noticed a similar cluster of a rare cancer called Kaposi’s sarcoma (肉瘤) in San Francisco, they suspected that something strange and serious was coming. That something was AIDS.
[B] Since then, 25m people have died from AIDS and another 34m are infected. The 30th anniversary of the disease’s discovery has been taken by many as an occasion for hand-wringing. Yet the war on AIDS is going far better than anyone dared hope. A decade ago, half of the people in several southern African countries were expected to die of AIDS. Now, the death rate is dropping. In 2005 the disease killed 2.1m people. In 2009, the most recent year for which data are available, the number was 1.8m. Some 5m lives have already been saved by drug treatment. In 33 of the worst-affected countries the rate of new infections is down by 25% or more from its peak.
[C] Even more hopeful is a recent study which suggests that the drugs used to treat AIDS may also stop its transmission. If that proves true, the drugs could acliieve much of what a vaccine (疫苗) would. The question for the world will no longer be whether it can wipe out the plague, but whether it is prepared to pay the price.
The appliance of science
[D] If AIDS is defeated, it will be thanks to an alliance of science, activism and unselfishness. The science has come from the world’s drug companies, which leapt on the problem. In 1996 a batch of similar drugs, all of them inhibiting the activity of one of the AIDS virus’s crucial enzymes (霉素), appeared almost simultaneously. The effect was miraculous, if you (or your government) could afford the $15,000 a year that those drugs cost when they first came on the market.
[E] Much of the activism came from rich-world gays. Having persuaded drug companies into creating the new medicines, the activists bullied them into dropping the price. That would have happened anyway, but activism made it happen faster. The unselfishness was aroused as it became clear by the mid-1990s that AIDS was not just a rich-world disease. Three-quarters of those affected were—and still are—in Africa. Unlike most infections, which strike children and the elderly, AIDS hits the most productive members of society: businessmen, civil servants, engineers, teachers, doctors, nurses. Thanks to an enormous effort by Western philanthropists (慈善家) and some politicians (this is one area where even the left should give credit to George Bush junior), a series of programmes has brought drugs to those infected.
[F] The result is unsatisfactory. Not enough people—some 6.6m of the 16m who would most quickly benefit—are getting the drugs. And the pills are not a cure. Stop taking them, and the virus bounces back. But it is a huge step forward from ten years ago.
[G] What can science offer now? A few people’s immune systems control the disease naturally, which suggests a vaccine might be possible, and antibodies have been discovered that neutralise the virus and might thus form the basis of AIDS-clearing drugs. But a cure still seems a long way off. Prevention is, for the moment, the better bet.
A question of money
[H] In the early days scientists were often attacked by activists for being more concerned with trying to prevent the epidemic spreading than treating the affected. Now it seems that treatment and prevention will come in the same pill. If you can stop the virus reproducing in someone’s body, you not only save his life, you also reduce the number of viruses for him to pass on. Get enough people on drugs and it would be like vaccinating them: the chain of transmission would be broken.
[I] That is a huge task. It is not just a matter of bringing in those who should already be on the drugs (the 16m who show symptoms or whose immune systems are critically weak). To prevent transmission, treatment would in theory need to be expanded to all the 34m people infected with the disease. That would mean more effective screening, which is planned already, and also a willingness by those without the symptoms to be treated. That willingness might be there, though, if it would protect people’s uninfected lovers.
[J] Such a programme would take years and also cost a lot of money. About $16 billion a year is spent on AIDS in poor and middle-income countries. Half is generated locally and half is foreign aid. A report in this week’s Lancet suggests a carefully crafted mixture of approaches that does not involve treating all those without symptoms would bring great benefit for not much more than this—a peak of $22 billion in 2015, and a fall thereafter. Moreover, most of the extra spending would be offset by savings on the treatment of those who would have been infected, but were not—some 12m people, if the scientists have done their sums right. At $500 per person per year, the benefits would far outweigh the costs in purely economic terms: though donors will need to compare the gain from spending more on knocking out AIDS against other worthy causes, such as eliminating malaria (疟疾).
[K] For the moment, the struggle is to stop some rich countries giving less. The Netherlands and Spain are cutting their contributions to the Global Fund, one of the two main distributors of the life-saving drugs, and Italy has stopped paying altogether. On June 8th the United Nations meets to discuss what to do next. Those who see the UN as a mere talking-shop should remember that its first meeting on AIDS launched the Global Fund. It is still a long haul. But AIDS can be beaten. A plague that 30 years ago was blamed on man’s wickedness has ended up showing him in a better, more inventive and generous light.
AIDS was first discovered by American scientists about some thirty years ago.
选项
答案
A
解析
本题有关艾滋病的历史,文中只在前三段提到艾滋病的历史,由first discovered和thirty years ago可以定位到A段。该段提到,1981年6月,艾滋病一开始被当作一种不同寻常的肺炎病毒而见诸报道,与本题相符,本题信息是对A段的归纳。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ija7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Ofallthecomponentsofagoodnight’ssleep,dreamsseemtobeleastwithinourcontrol.Indreams,awindowopensintoaworl
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledItIsMeaningfultoLearnfromPastMistakesbycommen
A、Howtopaintsomething.B、WhothepainterGrandWoodwas.C、Whyapaintingispopular.D、Simplefarmers’livinginAmerica.C录
TheUnitedStatesofAmericaisoftenseenasanationinwhichthepursuitofhappinessisnotadreambutareality.Thesadt
Overthepastdecade,Americancompanieshavetriedhardtofindwaystodiscourageseniorfromfeatheringtheirownnestsatth
A、Theychangedtheirwaysoftalking.B、Theychangetoanothertopic.C、Theymadetheirwaytochoosethewallpaperthatisfavo
A、Theyarediscussingwheretoputthefurniture.B、Theyarecomplainingaboutrunningoutofhotwater.C、Theyareplanningto
A、Sheblushedwhentalkingtoagroupofpeople.B、Shecouldn’thelplookingatasignwhenshegaveapresentation.C、Shedidn’
A、Mostofthepeoplewanttodomeaningfulwork.B、Amajorityofworkersaredoingmeaningfulwork.C、Happyworkerscanalwaysf
随机试题
无形资产评估所需的相关信息按照信息来源渠道的不同,可以分为()。
美国国会有权()
男,4个月,体重5kg。腹泻3天,每日7~8次,蛋花汤样、无腥臭,奶后呕吐2次。面色稍苍白。上腭裂,精神较差,皮肤稍干燥。眼窝、前囟凹陷。皮下脂肪减少,皮肤弹性较差,哭有泪。四肢末梢较冷,血清钠128mmol/L。当患儿痊愈出院时,对家长可作以下指导,
企业购入货物验收入库后,若发票账单尚未收到,应在月末按照估计的金额确认一笔负债,反映在资产负债表有关负债项目内。()
甲公司有关资料如下:(1)甲公司的利润表和资产负债表主要数据如下表所示。其中,2016年为实际值,2017年至2019年为预测值(其中资产负债表项目为期末值)。(2)甲公司2017年和2018年为高速成长时期,年增长率在6%~7%之间;2019年销售
工厂的一个车间就是一个法人。()
科学发展观的基本要求是()。
请简要解释段落中画线部分的知识点英国科学与社会研究所在2010年的一篇报告中称,美国转基因作物种植,使美国农业农药施用量从1996年到2008年增加了3.83亿磅02006年以来,已商业化的三大主要转基因作物玉米、大豆和棉花的农药需用量都持续上升且已大
WhenU.S.Newsstartedthecollegeanduniversityrankings25yearsago,nooneimaginedthattheselistswouldbecomewhatsom
在一个单CPU的计算机系统中,有两台外部设备R1、R2和三个进程P1、P2、P3。系统采用可剥夺方式优先级的进程调度方案,且所有进程可以并行使用I/O设备,三个进程的优先级、使用设备的先后顺序和占用设备时间如表5-4所示。假设操作系统的开销忽略不计,三
最新回复
(
0
)