首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1)Space may seem remote, but it’s really not that far away. The popular orbits for satellites begin twice as far up—about 400 m
(1)Space may seem remote, but it’s really not that far away. The popular orbits for satellites begin twice as far up—about 400 m
admin
2019-05-24
58
问题
(1)Space may seem remote, but it’s really not that far away. The popular orbits for satellites begin twice as far up—about 400 miles above our heads. There telecommunications and weather satellites orbit at the same rate that Earth rotates, allowing them to hover above a single spot on the Equator.
(2)It was the explosions of derelict rockets that first drew NASA’s attention to debris. In the 1970s Delta rockets left in orbit began blowing up after delivering their payloads. An investigation showed that the bulkheads separating the leftover fuels were probably cracking as a result of the rocket’s passing in and out of sunlight. NASA began recommending that leftover fuels be burned at the end of a flight, or that they be vented into space. Still, every few months on average an old rocket or satellite explodes, flinging a cloud of debris into space.
(3)For many years NASA and the Department of Defense were skeptical about the dangers of space debris. The problem seemed abstract, residing more in computer models than in hard experience. And it challenged the can-do mentality of space enthusiasts. Earth’s orbit seemed too large and empty to pollute. To its credit, NASA has long maintained a debris-research program, staffed by top-notch scientists who have persisted in pointing out the long-term hazards of space junk even when the higher-ups at NASA didn’t want to hear about it. Then the Challenger accident came in 1986. NASA officials realized that their emphasis on human space flight could backfire. If people died in space, public support for the shuttle program could unravel.
(4)Engineers took a new look at the shuttle and the international Space Station. Designed in the 1970s, when debris was not considered a factor, the shuttle was determined to be clearly vulnerable. After almost every mission windows on the shuttle are so badly pitted by microscopic debris that they need to be replaced. Soon NASA was flying the shuttle upside down and backward, so that its rockets, rather than the more sensitive crew compartments, would absorb the worst impacts. And engineers were adding shielding to the space station’s most vulnerable areas. At this point the modules should be able to survive impacts with objects measuring up to half an inch across, and NASA is developing repair kits for plugging larger holes in the walls.
(5)But adding shielding and repair kits won’t solve the real problem. The real problem is that whenever something is put into an orbit, the risk of collision for all objects in that orbit goes up. Therefore, the only truly effective measure is a process known as deorbiting—removing objects from orbit when they reach the end of their useful lives. With current technology deorbiting requires that a satellite or a rocket reserve enough fuel for one last trip after its operations are finished. With enough fuel a spacecraft can promptly immolate itself in the atmosphere or fly far away from the most crowded orbits. If less fuel is available, it can aim for an orbit where atmospheric drag will eventually pull it to Earth. The logic behind deorbiting has been inescapable since the beginning of the Space Age, yet it has just begun to penetrate the consciousness of spacecraft designers and launchers.
(6)Furthermore, the character of the Space Age is changing. The private sector now puts more payloads into orbit than do NASA and the U.S. and Russian militaries combined. A score of communications companies in the United States and other countries have announced plans that will put hundreds of satellites into orbit over the next decade. Many will fly in relatively low orbits within a few hundred miles above where the space station will orbit, so that they can relay signals coming from hand-held phones.
(7)None of these companies is under any obligation to limit orbital debris. Companies that are launching large constellations of satellites are worried about collisions between the satellites, and they are well aware that a public-relations disaster would ensue if a piece of a shattered satellite smacked the station. As a result, some plan to deorbit satellites at the end of their useful lives. But other companies are leaving their satellites up or are counting on atmospheric drag to bring them down.
(8)Government regulations covering orbital debris are still rudimentary. For now, the federal agencies that have authority over commercial launches are waiting to see if the private sector can deal with the problem on its own. But deorbiting rockets and satellites is expensive. A satellite could keep operating for several additional months if it didn’t need to reserve fuel for deorbiting. Some industry representatives say they want regulations, but only if the regulations apply to everyone and cannot be evaded.
(9)One reason for our nonchalance is that new technologies have gotten us out of many past scrapes— and maybe they will with orbital debris, too. Perhaps a future spaceship will race around Earth grabbing old spacecraft and flinging them back into the atmosphere, though it is hard to imagine a similar clean-up method for the small pieces of debris generated by collisional cascading. Maybe Star Wars technologies will produce a laser that can shoot orbital junk from the sky. In 1987 the World Commission on Environment and Development defined sustainable development as meeting the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs. In space we are failing the sustainability test miserably. A hundred years from now, when our descendants want to put satellites into orbits teeming with debris, they will wonder what we could have been thinking. The simple answer is we weren’t thinking at all.
A suitable title for the passage would be _____.
选项
A、Causes of Producing Space Debris
B、American Shuttle Program
C、Ways of Combating Space Debris
D、The Danger of Space Junk
答案
D
解析
本文就卫星残骸引起爆炸导致太空垃圾的问题做了探讨。NASA和国防部的态度不积极.加上政府的制度不完善,从而突出了太空垃圾的极大危害性。据此分析,选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/isbK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Humanity’shighlydevelopedabilitytocommunicateverballyisouressence.Withourtremendousvocabulary,wewouldperhapsbe【
Thoseofusinvolvedintheinternationalizationofhighereducationrelyonaseriesofassumptionsthatareoftennotsupport
Thoseofusinvolvedintheinternationalizationofhighereducationrelyonaseriesofassumptionsthatareoftennotsupport
Thoseofusinvolvedintheinternationalizationofhighereducationrelyonaseriesofassumptionsthatareoftennotsupport
Thoseofusinvolvedintheinternationalizationofhighereducationrelyonaseriesofassumptionsthatareoftennotsupport
PASSAGETHREEAccordingtoPlato,whatisthecoreofSocrates’sphilosophy?
Englishservesasafunctionalalternativelanguageinseveralareasofpublicactivityforthemanynationsoftheworldwhich
OnPublicSpeakingI.People’sfrequentresponsetogivingtheirfirstspeech:feel【T1】______【T1】______II.Thespeaker’ssecret
ApprenticeshipshavelongbeenpopularinEurope,butworkforce-orientedhighschooltrainingisnearlyascommonin【M1】______U
HowtoBuildYourVocabularyEffectivelyVocabularyisthefoundationoflearningalanguage.Withoutit,noneoftheskillscou
随机试题
王某涉嫌非法拘禁被逮捕后变更为监视居住,在监视居住期间违反监视居住规定。下列说法错误的是()。
治疗钩端螺旋体病最佳的药物是
以下哪项符合心血不足心悸
男,18岁。反复左侧腰部胀痛3年余。B超见左肾重度积水,左输尿管显示不清。总肾功能正常。尿常规:RBC(一),WBC5~10/HP。IVU检查示左肾显影不清晰,右肾正常。为明确病变的部位,最常用的检查方法是()
关于低钾血症的病因,下列哪项是错误的
《检验检测机构资质认定评审准则》规定,检验检测机构应当定期向资质认定部门上报年度报告,年度报告内容必须包括()。
对于公共建筑外墙的平均K值降为1.1W/(m2.K),再减小K值对降低建筑能耗己不明显的是哪个地区?
项目的财务盈利性至少在()方面可能难以全面正确地反映项目的经济合理性。
煤矿作业场所的瓦斯、粉尘或其他有毒有害气体的浓度超过国家安全标准或行业安全标准,经煤矿安全监察人员责令立即停止作业,拒不停止作业的,由煤矿安全监察机构()。
在考生文件夹下打开文档Word.docx,按照要求完成下列操作并以该文件名Word.docx保存文档。将标题段(“WinImp压缩工具简介”)设置为小三号宋体、居中,并为标题段文字添加蓝色(标准色)阴影边框。
最新回复
(
0
)