首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1)Space may seem remote, but it’s really not that far away. The popular orbits for satellites begin twice as far up—about 400 m
(1)Space may seem remote, but it’s really not that far away. The popular orbits for satellites begin twice as far up—about 400 m
admin
2016-11-03
33
问题
(1)Space may seem remote, but it’s really not that far away. The popular orbits for satellites begin twice as far up—about 400 miles above our heads. There telecommunications and weather satellites orbit at the same rate that Earth rotates, allowing them to hover above a single spot on the Equator.
(2)It was the explosions of derelict rockets that first drew NASA’s attention to debris. In the 1970s Delta rockets left in orbit began blowing up after delivering their payloads. An investigation showed that the bulkheads separating the leftover fuels were probably cracking as a result of the rocket’s passing in and out of sunlight. NASA began recommending that leftover fuels be burned at the end of a flight, or that they be vented into space. Still, every few months on average an old rocket or satellite explodes, flinging a cloud of debris into space.
(3)For many years NASA and the Department of Defense were skeptical about the dangers of space debris. The problem seemed abstract, residing more in computer models than in hard experience. And it challenged the can-do mentality of space enthusiasts. Earth’s orbit seemed too large and empty to pollute. To its credit, NASA has long maintained a debris-research program, staffed by top-notch scientists who have persisted in pointing out the long-term hazards of space junk even when the higher-ups at NASA didn’t want to hear about it. Then the Challenger accident came in 1986. NASA officials realized that their emphasis on human space flight could backfire. If people died in space, public support for the shuttle program could unravel.
(4)Engineers took a new look at the shuttle and the international Space Station. Designed in the 1970s, when debris was not considered a factor, the shuttle was determined to be clearly vulnerable. After almost every mission windows on the shuttle are so badly pitted by microscopic debris that they need to be replaced. Soon NASA was flying the shuttle upside down and backward, so that its rockets, rather than the more sensitive crew compartments, would absorb the worst impacts. And engineers were adding shielding to the space station’s most vulnerable areas. At this point the modules should be able to survive impacts with objects measuring up to half an inch across, and NASA is developing repair kits for plugging larger holes in the walls.
(5)But adding shielding and repair kits won’t solve the real problem. The real problem is that whenever something is put into an orbit, the risk of collision for all objects in that orbit goes up. Therefore, the only truly effective measure is a process known as deorbiting—removing objects from orbit when they reach the end of their useful lives. With current technology deorbiting requires that a satellite or a rocket reserve enough fuel for one last trip after its operations are finished. With enough fuel a spacecraft can promptly immolate itself in the atmosphere or fly far away from the most crowded orbits. If less fuel is available, it can aim for an orbit where atmospheric drag will eventually pull it to Earth. The logic behind deorbiting has been inescapable since the beginning of the Space Age, yet it has just begun to penetrate the consciousness of spacecraft designers and launchers.
(6)Furthermore, the character of the Space Age is changing. The private sector now puts more payloads into orbit than do NASA and the U.S. and Russian militaries combined. A score of communications companies in the United States and other countries have announced plans that will put hundreds of satellites into orbit over the next decade. Many will fly in relatively low orbits within a few hundred miles above where the space station will orbit, so that they can relay signals coming from hand-held phones.
(7)None of these companies is under any obligation to limit orbital debris. Companies that are launching large constellations of satellites are worried about collisions between the satellites, and they are well aware that a public-relations disaster would ensue if a piece of a shattered satellite smacked the station. As a result, some plan to deorbit satellites at the end of their useful lives. But other companies are leaving their satellites up or are counting on atmospheric drag to bring them down.
(8)Government regulations covering orbital debris are still rudimentary. For now, the federal agencies that have authority over commercial launches are waiting to see if the private sector can deal with the problem on its own. But deorbiting rockets and satellites is expensive. A satellite could keep operating for several additional months if it didn’t need to reserve fuel for deorbiting. Some industry representatives say they want regulations, but only if the regulations apply to everyone and cannot be evaded.
(9)One reason for our nonchalance is that new technologies have gotten us out of many past scrapes— and maybe they will with orbital debris, too. Perhaps a future spaceship will race around Earth grabbing old spacecraft and flinging them back into the atmosphere, though it is hard to imagine a similar clean-up method for the small pieces of debris generated by collisional cascading. Maybe Star Wars technologies will produce a laser that can shoot orbital junk from the sky. In 1987 the World Commission on Environment and Development defined sustainable development as meeting the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs. In space we are failing the sustainability test miserably. A hundred years from now, when our descendants want to put satellites into orbits teeming with debris, they will wonder what we could have been thinking. The simple answer is we weren’t thinking at all.
NASA has used all the following methods EXCEPT _____.
选项
A、adding some protective covering
B、fixing the concerned equipments
C、replacing the shuttle with a rocket
D、applying a new technology
答案
C
解析
第5段乃至全文均未提及NASA用火箭取代太空飞船这个方法,选C。第5段首句提到。安装防护层和修理装备不能真正解决问题,这说明A、B是采取的措施;第3句指出唯一有效的方法是使其脱轨,末句又明确指出“脱轨”刚开始深入到航空人员的头脑中,说明“脱轨”是一项新技术。故D也是措施之一。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/j07O777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
______wasconsideredasthebeginningofEnglishliteratureandthefirstepicinthehistoryofEnglishliterature.
Thepopularnotionaboutmarriageandloveisthattheyaresynonymous,thattheyspringfromthesamemotives,andcoverthes
Accordingtolegend,theancientOlympicGameswerefoundedbyHeracles,asonofZeus.YetthefirstOlympicGamesforwhich
TheyoungestcapitalintheU.K.aswellasinEuropeis
Theprocessbywhichawordisshortenedwithoutchangingitsmeaningandpartofspeechiscalled
Theworld-famousHollywoodvillage,whichdominatesthefilm-makingindustryofAmerica,isin
Notlongago,TedGupopenedabatteredoldsuitcasefromhismothersatticanddiscoveredafamilysecret.Insidewasathick
Brazil’scommercewithAfricahasbiginvestmentinallofthefollowingEXCEPT
Aswehaveseen,thereisnothingaboutlanguageassuchthatmakeslinguisticidentitycoextensivewithnationalidentity."If
PASSAGETHREEWhydidn’ttheSephardiccommunitiesinTurkeyandBulgariasufferfromtheNaziHolocaustduringWorldWarII?
随机试题
某台双水内冷发电机,其定子线电压UL为13.8kV,线电流IL为6150A,若负载的功率因数由0.85降到0.6时,求该发电机有功功率和无功功率任何变化?
某班有两位学生,学生甲热情直率、精力旺盛、口快心直、办事干脆,但容易急躁、情绪易激动,比较武断。学生乙孤僻敏感、善于思考、行动迟缓,情绪体验深刻又细腻、办事稳妥,不大合群。问题:如何根据这两位学生气质类型的特征进行教育?
某砖混结构典型工程,其建筑体积为600m3,毛石带型基础工程量为72m3。根据概算定额,10m3毛石带型基础需砌石工7.0工日,该单位工程无其他砌石工,则1000m3类似建筑工程需砌石工为()工日。
商业银行获得个人客户信用记录的途径不包括()。
导游服务()。
在教育过程中,采用下列哪些措施能有效培养学生的主动性?()
所有来自澳大利亚的留学生,都住在东区留学生公寓,所有住在东区留学生公寓内的学生,都必须参加今年的国际交流会;有些来自澳大利亚的留学生加入了汉语俱乐部;有些土木工程专业的学生也加入了汉语俱乐部;所有土木工程专业的学生都没有参加今年的国际交流会。由此不能推出
设A是正定矩阵,B是实对称矩阵,证明AB相似于对角矩阵.
Studythefollowingphotocarefullyandwriteanessayof160-200wordsinwhichyoushould1.describethephotobriefly,ande
在数据仓库环境中,粒度是一个重要的设计问题。粒度越【15】,细节程度越高,能回答的查询就越多,数据量就比较大。
最新回复
(
0
)