首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
At the fall 2001 Social Science History Association convention in Chicago, the Crime and Justice network sponsored a forum on th
At the fall 2001 Social Science History Association convention in Chicago, the Crime and Justice network sponsored a forum on th
admin
2010-05-25
45
问题
At the fall 2001 Social Science History Association convention in Chicago, the Crime and Justice network sponsored a forum on the history of gun ownership, gun use, and gun violence in the United States. Our purpose was to consider how social science history might contribute to the public debate over gun control and gun rights. To date, we have had little impact on that debate. It has been dominated by mainstream social scientists and historians, especially scholars such as Gary Kleck, John Lott, and Michael Bellesiles, whose work, despite profound flaws, is politically congenial to either opponents or proponents of gun control.① Kleck and Mark Gertz, for instance, argue on the basis of their widely cited survey that gun owners prevent numerous crimes each year in the Untied States by using firearms to defend themselves and their property. If their survey respondents are to be believed, American gun owners shot 100,000 criminals in 1994 in self-defense—a preposterous number. Lott claims on the basis of his statistical analysis of recent crime rates that laws allowing private individuals to carry concealed firearms to deter murders, rapes ,and robberies, because criminals are afraid to attack potentially armed victims. However, he biases his results by confining his analysis to the year between 1977 and 1992, when violent crime rates had peaked and varied little from year to year. He reports only regression models that support his thesis and neglects to mention that each of ’those models find a positive relationship between violent crime and real income, and inverse relationship between violent crime and unemployment.
Contrary to Kleck and Lott, Bellesiles insists that guns and America’s "gun culture" are responsible for America’s high rate of murder. In Belleville’s opinion, relatively few Americans owned guns before the 1850s or know how to use, maintain, or repair them. As a result, he says, guns contributed little to the homicide rate, especially among Whites, which was low everywhere, even in the South and on the frontier, where historians once assumed gun and murder went hand in hand. According to Bellesiles, these patterns changed dramatically after the Mexican War and especially after the Civil War, when gun ownership became widespread and cultural changes encouraged the use of handguns to command respect and resolve personal and political disputes. The result was an unprecedented wave of gun-related homicides that never truly abated. To this day, the United States has the highest homicide rate of any industrial democracy. Bellesile’s low estimates of gun ownership in early America conflict, however, with those of every historian who has previously studied the subject and has thus far proven irreproducible. Every homicide statistic he presents is either misleading or wrong.
Given the influence of Kleck, Lott, Bellesiles and other partisan scholars on the debate over gun control and gun rights, we felt a need to pull together what social science historians have learned to date about the history of gun ownership and gun violence in America, and to consider what research methods and projects might increase our knowledge in the near future. ②
Which of the following statements is TRUE about the public debate over gun ownership?
选项
A、It has little influence on the forum sponsored by the Crime and Justice network.
B、Neither supporters nor opponents of gun control cite the works of scholars.
C、The works of mainstream social scientists have great impact on it.
D、Many social science historians have so far failed to take part in it.
答案
C
解析
事实细节题。文章第一段第三句只是说我们的影响力微乎其微,所以召开这次会议邀请社会历史科学家加盟,并未说这次会议的影响,所以排除A ;根据第一段第四句话可排除选项B 选项D 文章中没有提到;根据文章第一段第四句话可知主流社会学家对枪支管制的影响很大,答案为C 。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/j72K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Letusconsiderwhatscienceandtechnologyhavetocontributetothefoodproblem.Thesimplestwaytoincreasefoodprodu
Letusconsiderwhatscienceandtechnologyhavetocontributetothefoodproblem.Thesimplestwaytoincreasefoodprodu
Letusconsiderwhatscienceandtechnologyhavetocontributetothefoodproblem.Thesimplestwaytoincreasefoodprodu
Letusconsiderwhatscienceandtechnologyhavetocontributetothefoodproblem.Thesimplestwaytoincreasefoodprodu
Letusconsiderwhatscienceandtechnologyhavetocontributetothefoodproblem.Thesimplestwaytoincreasefoodprodu
Letusconsiderwhatscienceandtechnologyhavetocontributetothefoodproblem.Thesimplestwaytoincreasefoodprodu
Letusconsiderwhatscienceandtechnologyhavetocontributetothefoodproblem.Thesimplestwaytoincreasefoodprodu
随机试题
简述教师的情绪与情感的特殊功能。
法洛四联症患儿,男,2岁,今晨突然晕厥、抽搐,最可能的原因是
患儿男,4岁,声嘶3个月来诊,门诊就诊查电子喉镜示声带前端淡红色、乳头状新生物,声带活动正常。入院后首选的治疗方案为
梁某已八十多岁,老伴和子女都已过世,年老体弱,生活拮据,欲立一份遗赠扶养协议,死后将三间房屋送给在生活和经济上照顾自己的人。梁某的外孙子女、侄子、侄女及干儿子等都争着要做扶养人。这些人中谁不应作遗赠扶养协议的扶养人?()
长江公司属于核电站发电企业,2015年1月1日正式建造完成并交付使用一座核电站核设施,全部成本为100000万元,预计使用寿命为40年。根据国家法律、行政法规和国际公约等规定,企业应承担环境保护和生态恢复等义务。2015年1月1日长江公司预计40年后该核电
(2009年第13题)“莫拉克”台风于2009年8月2日下午5时形成于菲律宾东面约1000公里处,随后给菲律宾、中国台湾和中国大陆等地造成了极大的损失。台风的形成过程是:在洋面温度超过26℃以上的热带或副热带海洋上,由于近洋面气温高,大量空气膨胀上升,使近
Psychologiststakecontrastiveviewsofhowexternalrewards,from【C1】________praisetocoldcash,affectmotivationandcreativ
Fire,scientistsagree,helpedgiverisetoasuccessful,thrivinghumanpopulationbyprovidingheatforcookingandprotection
()反倾销税()商品贸易差额()中转贸易区()佣金
A、Youjustkeepsilent.B、Youcancomplaindirectly.C、Youcantellhimdirectly.D、Youcanleaveasyoulike.C信息明示题。文章中明确地指出,一
最新回复
(
0
)