首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
" Sloganeering" did not originate in the 1960s. The term has a rich history. It originated from the Gaelic word slaughgharim, wh
" Sloganeering" did not originate in the 1960s. The term has a rich history. It originated from the Gaelic word slaughgharim, wh
admin
2019-04-17
52
问题
" Sloganeering" did not originate in the 1960s. The term has a rich history. It originated from the Gaelic word slaughgharim, which signified a " host-shout," " war cry," or " gathering word or phrase of one of the old Highland clans; hence the shout or battle cry of soldiers in the field. " English-speaking people began using the term by 1704. The term at the time meant "the distinctive note, phrase, or cry of any person or body of persons. " Slogans were common throughout the European continent during the middle ages, and they were utilized primarily as "passwords to insure proper recognition of individuals at night or in the confusion of battle. " The American revolutionary rhetoric would not have been the same without "the Boston Massacre," "the Boston Tea Party," "the shot heard around the world," and shouts of "no taxation without representation".
Slogans operate in society as " social symbols" and, as such, their intended or perceived meaning may be difficult to grasp and their impact or stimulation may differ between and among individuals and groups.
Because slogans may operate as " significant symbols" or as key words that have a standard meaning in a group, they serve both expressive and persuasive functions. Harold Lasswell recognized that the influencing of collective attitudes is possible by the manipulation of significant symbols such as slogans. He believed that a verbal symbol might evoke a desired reaction or organize collective attitudes around a symbol. Murray Edelman writes that "to the political scientist patterning or consistency in the context in which specific groups of individuals use symbols is crucial, for only through such patterning do common political meaning and claims arise. " Thus, the slogans a group uses to evoke specific responses may provide us with an index for the group’s norm, values, and conceptual rationale for its claims.
Slogans are so pervasive in today’s society that it is easy to underestimate their persuasive power. They have grown in significance because of the medium of television and the advertising industry. Television, in addition to being the major advertising medium, has altered the nature of human interaction. Political images are less personal and shorter. They function as summaries and conclusions rather than bases for public interaction and debate. The style of presentation in television is more emotional, but the content is less complex or ideological. In short, slogans work well on television.
The advertising industry has made a science of sloganeering. Today, communication itself is a problem because we live in an " overcommunicated" society. Advertisers have discovered that it is easier to link product attributes to existing beliefs, ideas, goals, and desires of the consumer rather than to change them. Thus, to say that a cookie tastes "homemade" or is as good as "Mom used to make" does not tell us if the cookie is good or bad, hard or soft, but simply evokes the fond memories of Mother’s baking. Advertisers, then, are more successful if they present a product in a way that capitalizes on established beliefs or expectations of the consumer. Slogans do this well by crystallizing in a few words the key idea or theme one wants to associate with an issue, group, product, or event. "Sloganeering" has become institutionalized as a virtual art form, and an advertising a-gency may spend months testing and creating the right slogan for a product or a person.
Slogans have a number of attributes that enhance their persuasive potential for social movements. They are unique and readily identifiable with a specific social movement or social movement organization. "Gray Power," for instance, readily identifies the movement for elderly Americans, and "Huelga"(strike in Spanish)identifies the movement to aid Mexican American field workers in the west and southwest.
Because slogans are "social symbols" they______.
选项
A、can have different meanings in different cultural and economic settings
B、are widely used as status symbols
C、can be used to demonstrate high social standing
D、are perceived as difficult to grasp
答案
D
解析
细节题。文章第二段指出口号作为社会符号,其预期或感知意义可能很难掌握并且其对个人和团体的影响和激励程度也有所不同。由此可得D项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/jEra777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
HighereducationbeganintheUnitedStateswiththefoundingof________.
Ingeneral,()languageacquisitionreferstochildren’sdevelopmentoftheirlanguageofthecommunityinwhichachildhas
Peoplecanrecognizedifferencesbetweenchildrenandadults.Canyousimplysaythatcollegestudentsareadults?Whatevents(e
Hewouldn’tanswerthereporters’questions,norwouldhe______foraphotograph.
"Awriter’sjobistotellthetruth,"saidHemingwayin1942.Nootherwriterofourtimehadsofiercelyasserted,sopugnacio
______ananswer,theydecidedtosendanexpresstelegramtothem.
Theeighteenth-centuryBritishthinkerEdmundBurkemadethefollowingobservationaboutthebenefitsofopposition;"Hethatw
Manycountrieshadalreadyremovedthedistinctionbetweenwidowsandwidowersasregardseligibilityforsurvivors’benefits,a
TheaverageyoungAmericannowspendspracticallyeverywakingminute—exceptforthetimeinschool,thoughreluctantly—usin
Practicallyspeaking,theartisticmaturingofthecinemawasthesingle-handedachievementofDavidW.Griffith(1875-1948).B
随机试题
A.伸膝障碍B.踝背伸、外翻功能障碍C.踝跖屈、内翻功能障碍D.伸踝障碍E.足趾跖屈障碍胫神经损伤
水蛭与虻虫均具有的功效是
注意衰退包括()等表现。
接力跑比赛中,一名运动员在完成交接棒时身体在接力区外,棒在里,可以判运动员犯规。()
2017年二季度与三季度相比较,三季度销售额约增长了:
A、 B、 C、 D、 B
随着淡水供应已达极限,五大洲50多个国家或许很快就将因争夺水资源而发生冲突,除非他们就如何分享流经国际边界的河流迅速达成协议。目前全球各地都在谈论夺水战争,2001年3月,联合国秘书长安南说,“对淡水的激烈争夺很可能成为未来冲突和战争的根源,美国
A.briefB.entriesC.intoA.beclassified【T1】______fourtypesB.【T2】______formofweblogC.【T3】______onablogare
A.Idon’tknowwhichoneisthebestforhim.B.I’lltakeone.C.yoursonwillenjoyplayingwithit.A:Goodmorning,sir.W
我常常听人说,他想读一点书,苦于没有时间。我不太同意这种说法。不管他是多么忙,他总不至于忙得一点时间都抽不出来。一天当中如果抽出一小时来读书,一年就有365小时,十年就有3650小时,积少成多,无论什么研究都会有惊人的成绩。零碎的时间最可宝贵,但也最容易丢
最新回复
(
0
)