首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
People are moving to cities in droves. In 1950, two-thirds of the worlds’ population lived in the countryside. New York was then
People are moving to cities in droves. In 1950, two-thirds of the worlds’ population lived in the countryside. New York was then
admin
2011-01-08
63
问题
People are moving to cities in droves. In 1950, two-thirds of the worlds’ population lived in the countryside. New York was then the only settlement with more than 10 million people. Today there are 20 such megacities, and more are on the way.
Most of these megacities are in developing countries that are struggling to cope with both the speed and the scale of human migration. Estimates of the future spread of urbanization are based on the observation that in Europe, and in North and South America, the urban share of the total population has stabilized at 75%--85%. If the rest of the world follows this path it is expected that in the next decade an extra 100 million people will join the cities of Africa, and 340 million the cities of Asia: the equivalent of a new Bangkok every two months. By 2030 nearly two-thirds of the world’s population will be urban.
In the long run, that is good news. If countries now industrialising follow the pattern of those that have already done so, their city-dwellers will be both more prosperous and healthier. Man is gregarious species, and the Words "urbane" and "civilised" both derive from the advantages of living in large settlements.
History also shows, though, that the transition can be uncomfortable. The slums of Manchester were, in their time, just as awful as those of Nairobi today. But people moved there for exactly the same reason: however nasty conditions seemed, the opportunities of urban life outstripped those of the countryside. The question is how best to handle the change.
If there is one thing that everybody agrees on, it is that urbanization is unstoppable. Migrants attempting to escape poverty, and refugees escaping conflict, are piling into cities in what the executive director of UN-HABITAT, Anna, Tibailjuka, describes as "premature urbanization."
Dr Tibaijuka believes it might be possible to slow the pace of migration from the countryside with policies that enhance security and rural livelihoods. There is room for debate, though, over whether better rural development in any form can seriously slow the pace of urbanisation -- or even whether such a slowdown would be a good thing.
Michael Mutter, an urban planning adviser at the British government’s Department for International Development (DFID), says that the relevant indicators suggest that in many countries the effective "carrying capacity" of rural areas has been reached. As happened in Europe in the 18th century, population growth and technological improvements to agriculture are creating a surplus population. That surplus has to go somewhere to earn its living.
Indeed, some people go so far so to argue that governments, international donors and aid agencies spend too much on rural development and neglect the cities. Most countries have a rural development policy, but only a few have urban ones. DFID, for example, spends only 5% of its budget directly on urban development. Moreover, these critics point out that, although rural areas often have worse sanitation, illiteracy and homelessness than cities, such figures are deceptive. Being illiterate, homeless or without access to a flush toilet are far more serious problems in a crowded city than in the countryside.
Of the many lessons being learnt from past urban-development failures, one of the most important is that improvements must involve local people in a meaningful way. Even when it comes to the poorest slumdwellers, some governments and city authorities are realizing that people are their own greatest assets. Slumdwellers International is a collection of "grassroots" federations of people living in slums. Its idea is simple. Slum-dwellers in a particular place get together and form a federation to strengthen local savings and credit schemes, and to lobby for greater co- operation with the authorities. Such federations are having a big impact on slum-upgrading schemes around the world.
By surveying local needs and acting as voices for slum-dwellers, these federations have been able to show the authorities that slum-dwellers are not simply a homogenous and anonymous mass of urban poor, but are real people in need of real services. They have also been able to apply pressure for improvements in security of tenure-- either through temporary guarantees of residency or, better still, formal ownership. Such secure tenure gives people an incentive to improve their dwellings and is thus the crucial first step to upgrading a slum into a suburb.
Over the past six years, South Africa’s government has been pursuing an active programme of housing improvement. The government quickly realized that, with the poor in the majority, providing social housing for all would be impossible. The minister for housing, Sakie Mthembi-Mahanyele, says the approach that has worked so far has been a combination of government, the private sector and the poor themselves. The poor, says Mrs Mthembi-Mahanyele, have responsibilities, and the government meets them halfway. Those with an income are expected to contribute some of it to the building of their houses. Those without are asked to contribute "sweat equity" by helping to build with their own hands.
South Africa has also transferred ownership of more than 380,000 council houses, worth more than 28 billion rand ($2.7 billion) to private individuals. With these houses as collateral for loans, owners have already started to upgrade and improve their properties. There is still a long way to go. An estimated 2-3 million more houses are needed. She adds that the government is still wrestling with financial institutions to get a better deal for the poor.
According to the passage, some slumdwellers are not interested in improving their environments because they ______。
选项
A、are unsure of their residency
B、dislike urbanization
C、are used to the president environment
D、are homogeneous and anonymous
答案
A
解析
细节题。根据第10段,一些贫民窟居民联盟通过施加压力来争取贫民窟居民的永久居住权和所有权,这样人们才有积极性来改变自己的居住环境。因此选项A正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/jVeO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
HowmanytermscanapresidentintheUnitedStatesbeelectedtoatmost?
WhichoneofthefollowingstatementsistrueofWilliamFaulkner?
ClassificationofLodgingPlacesThetouristindustryhasitsownsystemtoclassifydifferenttypesoflodgingplaces.Five
Whiteneighborhoodsarebecomingdarkerin【1】______andmoreexpensive.【1】______Analystssaythatsoaringhousepricesandboom
WhichofthefollowingisNOTconsideredpartofsemanticchange?
ThereisagreatconcerninEuropeandNorthAmericaaboutdecliningstandardsofliteracyinschools.InBritain,thefactthat
Whichofthefollowingcitiesisfamousforthetextileindustries?
UlyssesandDublinerswerewrittenby______.
In1969,theNationalWildlifeFederationbegantorecordanindexofenvironmentalqualitywhichmeasuresprogressordeclinei
IntheAustralianstateofNewSouthWales,agovernmentsponsorsurveyrevealedsomeshockingstatisticsregarding【1】_
随机试题
锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞麻醉处常为
孔的“特征参数编辑”可以有哪些选项?
重农主义
下列有关剖宫产术的适应证,应除外
健康教育的核心问题是改变个体和群体的
股份有限公司以超过股票票面金额的发行价格发行股份所得的溢价款应当列为公司的()。
甲公司20×6年末应确认的合同预计损失为( )万元。甲公司20×7年应确认的合同毛利为( )万元。
甲企业计划利用一笔长期资金投资购买股票。现有M公司股票和N公司股票可供选择,甲企业只准备投资一家公司股票。已知M公司股票现行市价为每股9元,上午每股股利为0.15元,预计以后每年以6%的增长率增长。N公司股票现行市价为每股7元,上年每股股利为0.6元,股利
符合我国宪法关于私有财产规定的是()。
驻留在多个网络设备上的程序在短时间内同时产生大量的请求消息冲击某Web服务器,导致该服务器不堪重负,无法正常响应其他合法用户的请求,这属于(39)。
最新回复
(
0
)