首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2010-06-30
85
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trail system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a con test) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" —especially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
The passage ______.
选项
A、questions whether the system of trial by jury can ever be completely efficient
B、suggests a number of reforms which should be made to the legal system of various countries
C、describes how the British legal system works and compares it favourably with other systems
D、compares the legal systems of a number of countries and discusses their advantages and disadvantages
答案
D
解析
综合全文,我们可以看到,文章第一段指出了英国法律制度存在的弊端,第二段谈到英国法律制度的优点,第三段谈到英国法律制度相比法国法律制度存在的利弊,第四、第五段则评述了英美国家法律制度的异同。由此我们可以推断,全文的主旨是将几国的法律制度相比较并阐述了他们各自的利弊,因此正确答案应当为D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/k6Jd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
TheissueofonlineprivacyintheInternetagefoundnewurgencyfollowingtheSept.11terroristattacks,sparkingdebateover
AnswerQuestions71to80byreferringtothe3articlesonjuveniledelinquency.AnswereachquestionbychoosingA,BorCand
YouwillhearaspeechbyBobChase,PresidentoftheNationalEducationAssociation(NEA)totheAmericanAssociationofColleges
Therewasatimeinthelate17thcenturywhennorespectablemonarchwouldbeseenwithoutaguitar.BothLouisXIVandCharle
Manyuniversitystudents【C1】______studyinghistorybecausethereislittletogetexcitedaboutwhenhistoricaleventsareprese
Queusearelong.Lifeisshort.Sowhywastetimewaitingwhenyoucanpaysomeonetodoitforyou?InWashingtonD.C.—acit
【B1】ThefreeenterprisesystemhasproducedatechnologycapableofprovidingtheAmericanconsumerwiththelargestandmostva
TheFBI(FederalBureauofInvestigation)hadfoundanewwaytocatchcriminalsbylookingattheirjeans.Scientistsfromthe
85%根据“Afterall,85percentofdoctorssupportexperimentsonanimals.”得出答案。句子中出现各类承接词时要特别注意,上下文往往是考点所在。
Whenwastheeurolaunched?
随机试题
除去KCl中含有的少量K2CO3,应选用的试剂是()。
用人单位违反《劳动合同法》的规定解除劳动合同的,应向劳动者支付经济补偿标准倍的赔偿金。()
场景甲机电公司承接某新建油库的球罐现场组装焊接工程,要求采用散装法施工。机电公司编制了施工设计和球罐现场组装方案,经总工程师批准开始施工,工程按方案进展的很顺利。球罐安装完毕,进行充水试验,发现罐壁不严密,而且产品焊接试板和球罐焊后几何尺寸也不符合要求。
以下关于管道支架叙述正确的是()。
某企业试验用两种新材料生产产品。现从每种材料生产的产品中各随机抽取5个进行检验,测得产品的抗拉力(kg)数据如表2—1所示。请根据上述资料从下列备选答案中选出正确答案。[2012年初级真题]采用材料B生产的产品,其抗拉强度(kg)的(
相传大势至菩萨的道场在()。
阅读有关文本赏鉴的教学论文(节选),按照要求答题。题目是文章的眼睛。它往往是作者经过反复的推敲琢磨而来的.往往能概括文章内容或者是点明文章的中心。如《穷人》这篇课文用“穷人”为题,但是读完全文,让人感到奇怪的是,作者在行文中,却从未出现“穷”的字眼。但是,
从整体发展来看,小学生品德发展的关键年龄大致是()。
有些员工在经过了一段时间的工作之后,并不能达到预期的效果。IBM公司通常会分析出几种情况:一种真的是技能技巧的问题,第二种是态度的问题。如果真的是工作技能技巧的问题,我们会想办法提高员工的工作能力。如果是不适合这个岗位,我们根据员工的特点进行相应的调配,调
数字信封技术能够______。
最新回复
(
0
)