首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-06-14
68
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
The phrase "riding roughshod over" in the last paragraph probably means
选项
A、reflecting upon.
B、resting upon.
C、trampling upon.
D、looking upon.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/kAOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingisTRUE?
Gulliver’sTravelswaswrittenby______.
______,writtenin1854byCharlesDickens,isanearnestattackonthevulgarityandmaterialismoftherisingmiddleclassind
Tounderstandthemarketingconcept,it’sonlynecessarytounderstandthedifferencebetweenmarketingandselling.Nottooma
Accordingtolegend,theancientOlympicGameswerefoundedbyHeracles,asonofZeus.YetthefirstOlympicGamesforwhich
WhichofthefollowingwaswrittenbyHarrietBeecherStowe?
WhichofthefollowingplaysisNOTwrittenbyEugeneO’Neill?
Languagelearningbeginswithlistening.Individualchildrenvarygreatlywiththeamountoflisteningtheydobeforetheystart
Theoppositionsupportersralliedinthecenterofthecapitalto
嫉妒是一种微妙的情感,强烈而又隐蔽,自己对自己也不愿意承认,却又时不时地表现出来。嫉妒很伤人,很降低人,使人变蠢,变得可笑,可悲,可厌。一个人越是掩饰自己的嫉妒,就越容易被别人觉察出来。嫉妒是弱者的激情,因为他除了嫉妒还是嫉妒,做不出什么能使自己感到自豪、
随机试题
肛管长约
工程监理企业组织形式中,由()决定聘任或者解聘有限责任公司的经理。
根据工程质量事故造成的人员伤亡或者直接经济损失,工程质量事故分为()
全玻幕墙安装符合技术要求的是()。
会计凭证是在经济业务发生或完成时由会计人员填制的凭证,因此它具有一定的法律效力。()
在各生产步骤都要计算产品成本的情况下,采用综合逐步结转分步法进行产品成本核算,不便于通过产品成本明细账分别考察各生产步骤存货占用资金情况。()
某股份有限公司共发行股份3000万股,每股享有平等的表决权。公司拟召开股东大会对另一公司合并的事项作出决议。在股东大会表决时可能出现下列情形中,能使决议得以通过的是()。
在《圣经.旧约》的记载中,带领以色列人走出埃及、回到迦南的领袖是()。
但书
ThemanagersatTurnerswantedtobuythecompanybecauseit
最新回复
(
0
)