首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-06-14
83
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
The phrase "riding roughshod over" in the last paragraph probably means
选项
A、reflecting upon.
B、resting upon.
C、trampling upon.
D、looking upon.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/kAOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhatIsIt?AttheCenterforSickle-CellAnemiainBeninCity,Nigeria,Tope’smotherlearnedthatsickle-cellanemiaisa
TheProblemsofTakingEnglishCoursesThroughEnglishWhenstudentstakecoursesthroughthemediumofEnglish,theyhaveto
Accordingtothenewsitem,whatisexpectedfromObama’sannouncement?
MyJoyinTeachingandLearningIhavebeenengagedinteachingIntensiveReadingCoursetoPhD【1】ofScienceandTechnology
______issouthern-mostcapitalcityintheworld.
Thenatureoflanguageisthenatureofhumanthoughtandhumanaction,forlanguageisnomorenorlessthanthetoolofboth
Educationalphilosophyhaschangedagreatdealinthe50yearssinceIwasinschool.Backthen,forexample,Ihadthehighe
Iwanttomakeuseofthisshortgatheringtomakeclearourworkingrequirement.Thisisabigcompany,andallclerksshouldk
Inthe1990s,MicrosoftInternetExplorerbattledNetscapeNavigatorinthegreatWebbrowserwars.Inthe2000s,GoogleandYah
书籍到了我的手里,我的习惯是先看序文,次看目录。页数不多的往往立刻通读,篇幅大的,只把正文任择一二章节略加翻阅,就插在书架上。除小说外,我少有全体读完的大部的书,只凭了购入当时的记忆,知道某册书是何种性质,其中大概有些什么可取的材料而已。什么书在什么时候再
随机试题
下列关于个性的说法不正确的是()
关于溶液的等渗与等张的叙述哪些是正确的
关于规范规定的纵向受拉钢筋的最小锚固长度Ia,以下叙述何为正确?[2001年第76题]
“工作”和“职业”的主要区别在于()。
武大郎娶妻:凶多吉少
我们不可_________,不可完全以自己的心理取代入物的心理。每个人都有自己的生存逻辑,其中包括日常生活的逻辑,还有文化心理的逻辑。逻辑是很强大的,差不多像是铁律。人们之所以这样做,而不是那样做,受到的是逻辑的_________和制约。薛宝钗和林黛玉的逻
设一经济体系的消费函数为C=600+0.8Y,投资函数为I=400-50r,政府购买支出G=200,货币需求函数为L=250+0.5Y-125r,货币供给M=1250,单位均是亿元,价格水平P=1,试求:(1)IS和LM方程;(2)均衡收
GoldensunshopBusinessHours:8:00a.m.-9:00p.m.SorryClosedforlunch12:30-1:30p.m.Theshoeshopisopen______.
thepublic
TomakeyourdrivingexperienceintheUnitedStatessafeandenjoyable,ourcompanyisprovidingyouwiththis"RulesoftheRo
最新回复
(
0
)