首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-06-14
32
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
The phrase "riding roughshod over" in the last paragraph probably means
选项
A、reflecting upon.
B、resting upon.
C、trampling upon.
D、looking upon.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/kAOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Theearliestcontroversiesabouttherelationshipbetweenphotographyandartcenteredonwhetherphotograph’sfidelitytoappea
Theearliestcontroversiesabouttherelationshipbetweenphotographyandartcenteredonwhetherphotograph’sfidelitytoappea
Cultureshockisapainfulexperiencewegothroughwhenweencountermanynewthingsinanothercountryandwe【1】______insom
Accordingtothenewsitem,whatisexpectedfromObama’sannouncement?
Nowomancanbetoorichortoothin.ThissayingoftenattributedwiththelateDuchessofWindsorembodiesmuchofthe【M1】____
TheSeattleTimesCompanyisonenewspaperfirmthathasrecognizedtheneedforchangeanddonesomethingaboutit.Inthene
DaisyMilleriswrittenby
除了读书之外,同知心的朋友通信,有时也教我感到一点兴奋。因为写信时可以上天下地的无所不谈,谈的话虽然都不关重要,而且大都是杂乱无章,然而不必像对社会说话时要打起什么腔调。也不必像做学术论文时必须严密地构思。有什么话便说什么,想到那里,笔便写到那里,正是个性
TheyhelpedfleeingRomansevadeAttilatheHunandheldaglitteringcityaloftformorethan1,500years.Butthewoodenpilin
WhyisthereaGermany?PartoftheanswergoesbacktoabattlefoughtinA.D.9inthetreacherousmarshesanddensethickets
随机试题
A.肾盂成形术B.肾盂切开取石术C.肾实质切开取石术D.肾部分切除术E.非手术治疗肾下盏明显扩张,局部肾实质萎缩,内有多个大小不等的结石需行
对于病危患者、病重患者、病情稳定患者病程记录频率至少分别为
几个同级人民法院都有管辖权的案件,应由最初受理的人民法院审判。在必要的时候可以移送下列哪一法院审判?()
在建立建筑火灾风险评估指标体系时,一般遵循的原则有()。
“国有贤良之士众,则国家之治厚;贤良之土寡,则国家之治薄”。人才,尤其领导人才,如何科学准确地识别、选拔、使用,是事关国家兴亡的重大问题。江泽民同志在中央纪委第七次全会上特别强调,要把人选准用好,干部的优劣和是非功过,群众看得最清楚,也最有发言权。对于如何
下列说法中,错误的是
ReadthemagazinearticlebelowaboutAndySeymour,theChiefExecutiveofachainofbookstorescalledBookroom,andthequest
WebChat1.Participantsinchatsessions-Inthepast:【T1】______toAmericaOnline【T1】______-Now:hundredsofwebsitesprov
HowtheCIAWorks[A]DespiteplentyofHollywoodfilmsabouttheCIAanditsspies,manypeoplestilldon’tknowwhattheag
【S1】【S6】
最新回复
(
0
)