首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Last month Hanson Transmissions International, a maker of gearboxes for wind turbines, was listed on the London Stock Exchange.
Last month Hanson Transmissions International, a maker of gearboxes for wind turbines, was listed on the London Stock Exchange.
admin
2011-02-11
48
问题
Last month Hanson Transmissions International, a maker of gearboxes for wind turbines, was listed on the London Stock Exchange. Nothing noteworthy about that, you might say, despite the jump in the share price on the first day of trading and the handsome gain since: green technology is all the rage, is it not? But Hanson exemplifies another trend too, which should prove every bit as durable: the rise of multinational companies from emerging economies. Its parent is Suzlon, an Indian firm that began life as a textile manufacturer but is now among the world’s five leading makers of wind turbines. Along the way, Suzlon has acquired not only Hanson, originally Belgian, but also REpower, a German wind-energy firm, spending over $ 2 billion on the pair.
The world is now replete with Suzlons: global companies from emerging economies buying businesses in rich countries as well as in poorer places. Another Indian company, Tata Motors, looks likely to add to the list soon, by buying two grand old names of British carmaking, Jaguar and Land Rover, from America’s enfeebled Ford. As a symbol of a shift in economic power, this is hard to match.
Economic theory says that this should not happen. Richer countries should export capital to poorer ones, not the other way round. Economists have had to get used to seeing this turned on its head in recent years, as rich countries have run large current-account deficits and borrowed from China and other emerging economies (notably oil exporters) with huge surpluses. Similarly, foreign direct investment (FDI) -- the buying of companies and the building of factories and offices abroad--should also flow from rich to poor, and with it managerial and entrepreneurial prowess.
It is not yet time to tear up the textbook on FDI. According to the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), in 2006 the flow of FDI into developing economies exceeded the outflow by more than $ 200 billion. But the transfer of finance and expertise is by no means all in one direction. Developing economies accounted for one-seventh of FDI outflows in 2006, most of it in the form of takeovers. Indian companies have done most to catch the eye, but firms from Brazil, China and Mexico, in industries from cement to consumer electronics and aircraft manufacture, have also gone global. Up to a point, emerging-market multinationals have been buying Western know-how. But they have been bringing managerial and entrepreneurial skill, as well as just money, to the companies they buy: British managers bear grudging witness to the financial flair of Mexican cement bosses; Boeing and Airbus may have learnt a thing or two from the global supply chains of Brazil’s Embraer.
Perhaps no one should be surprised. Half a century ago, Japan was a poor country: today Sony and Toyota are among the best-known and mightiest companies on the planet. South Korea and Taiwan are still listed as developing countries in UNCTAD’s tables, but that seems bizarrely outdated for the homes of Samsung and Taiwan Semiconductor. Now another generation is forming. To its critics, globalisation may be little more than a licence for giant Western companies to colonise the emerging world, yet more and more firms from poorer economies are planting their flags in rich ground.
Alas, further liberalisation is not certain. The Doha round of global trade talks has been bogged down, partly in squabbles about farm trade but also over industrial tariffs in the emerging world. The services negotiations are half-hearted and direct talks on FDI were ruled out long ago, largely because of developing countries’ fears about rich invaders. And the gains forgone are considerable: a new book by the World Bank estimates that reforming services in developing countries could raise their growth rates by a percentage point. Were OECD countries to allow temporary immigration of skilled workers in service industries, the global gains might exceed $ 45 billion.
A few emerging-market giants-notably India’s software firms-have been prepared to stand up for liberalisation. But most have not made their voices heard. How sad for free trade: such companies would provide much better illustrations of the success of globalisation than the familiar Western names do (unless you think Coca-colonisation sounds really cool). And how short-sighted of them. Even if some of these adolescents grew up behind tariff barriers, that represents their past: their future will surely lie in global markets. If the Doha round fails, the next opportunity may be a long time coming.
It can be inferred from the passage that
选项
A、the future of global free trade is optimistic.
B、developing countries make no contribution to liberalization.
C、the concern of developing countries may affect the progress of liberalization.
D、issues negotiated in the Doha round of global trade talks weren’t practical.
答案
C
解析
推断题。从文章第六段内容来看,在多哈回合全球贸易谈判中发达国家与发展中国家为各自的利益角力,而发展中国家由于害怕富国公司会长驱直入,导致关于服务行业谈判效率不高,外国直接投资的谈判甚至早已被排除。文章继而论述了由此导致的巨大的利益损失,可能影响贸易进一步自由化,故[C]为答案。而这使得贸易自由化的前景不确定,故排除[A] 综合文章前五段的论述可知,发展中国家新兴经济体的崛起,在全球经济的积极因素,[B]与之不符,故排除。同时,根据第六段可知,多哈回合全球贸易谈判所涉及问题都与贸易全球化和自由化息息相关,故排除[D]
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/kOeO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
RobertCongel,acommercialreal-estatedeveloperwholivesinupstateNewYork,hasaplanto"changetheworld."Convincedtha
A、Thiswasthefirstcongressionalvisittotheprison.B、Thelawmakersatethesamelaunchgiventodetainees.C、ASenatadeleg
A、Fishermen.B、Scientists.C、Tourists.D、Surfers.D
WhichbandisfromBritain?
WomenandtheWinningoftheWestThepopularversionofthelonewagontrain,forgingitswaywest,inconstantdangeroflo
NewYorkwasoncethemurdercapitaloftheworld.Thankstothezero-tolerancepolicingpolicyintroducedbyGiuliani,themean
Ithasalwaysbeendifficultforthephilosopherorscientiststofittimeintohisviewoftheuniverse.PriortoEinsteinianp
A、escalatedintociviccampaignsnationwideB、calledforaboycottofJapanesegoodsC、postponedjointmilitaryexerciseswithT
Theworldisgoingthroughthebiggestwaveofmergersandacquisitionseverwitnessed.TheprocesssweepsfromhyperactiveAmer
______isconcernedwiththesocialsignificanceoflanguagevariationandlanguageuseindifferentspeechcommunities.
随机试题
甲方案的标准离差是2.11,乙方案的标准离差是2.14,如果甲、乙两方案的期望值相同,则甲方案的风险__________乙方案的风险。
能促进肝分泌胆汁的因素有
外国有学者称刑事诉讼法为“宪法适用法”(AppliedConstitutionalLaw)。请你运用刑事诉讼法学的基本理论,简要谈谈你对这种说法的理解。(北京大学2004年法学硕士研究生入学考试试题)
市场经济存在的规律有()。
详细可行性研究阶段的投资估算至关重要,投资估算误差率在()以内。
为组织流水施工而进行施工段的划分时,同一专业工作队在各个施工段上的劳动量应大致相等,相差幅度不宜超过()。
为了保护当事人的利益,依据《中华人民共和国合同法》的规定,有下列()情形之一的,要约不得撤销。
GSM通信系统采用的多址方式为()。
教师礼仪的特点包括()。
一、注意事项 1.申论考试,与传统作文考试不同,是对分析驾驭材料的能力与对表达能力并重的考试。 2.作答参考时限:阅读资料40分钟,作答110分钟。 3.仔细阅读给定的资料,按照后面提出的“申论要求”依次作答。二、给定资料(1)
最新回复
(
0
)