首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1)Pessimism about the United States rarely pays off in the long run. Time and again, when Americans have felt particularly glum
(1)Pessimism about the United States rarely pays off in the long run. Time and again, when Americans have felt particularly glum
admin
2021-08-05
30
问题
(1)Pessimism about the United States rarely pays off in the long run. Time and again, when Americans have felt particularly glum their economy has been on the brink of a revival. Think of Jimmy Carter’s cardigan-clad gloom in the inflation-ridden late 1970s, or the fear of competition from Japan that marked the "jobless recovery" of the early 1990s. Both times the United States bounced back, boosted on the first occasion by Paul Volcker’s conquest of inflation and on the second by a productivity spurt that sent growth rates soaring in the mid-1990s even as Japan stalled.
(2)That record is worth bearing in mind today. Americans are unhappy, and becoming more so, about their country’s prospects and politicians’ efforts to improve them. In a new New York Times/CBS News poll, seven out of ten respondents said America is on the wrong track. Almost 60% of Americans disapprove of the President’s handling of the economy, and three out of four think Congress is doing a lousy job.
(3)This unease partly reflects the sluggishness of me recovery. Though unemployment has been falling and share prices are close to a three-year high, house prices are still in the dumps and the price of petrol has soared to levels not seen since the summer of 2008. But it’s not all about oil or indeed the short term. A careful reading of the polls suggests mat Americans’ worries stretch well beyond the next couple of years: about stagnating living standards and a dark future in an economy slow to create jobs, saddled with big government deficits.
(4)Are these worries justified? On the plus side, it is hard to think of any large country with as many inherent long-term advantages as America. But it is also plain that the United States does indeed have long-term economic weaknesses—and ones that will take time to fix. The real worry for Americans should be that their politicians, not least their president, are doing so little to tackle these underlying problems.
(5)The first failing, of which Mr President in particular is guilty, is misstating the problem. He likes to frame America’s challenges in terms of "competitiveness". This is mostly nonsense. America’s prosperity depends not on other countries’ productivity growth, but on its own(actually pretty fast)pace.
(6)Of course, plenty more could be done to spur innovation. The system of corporate taxation is a mess and deters domestic investment. Mr President is right that America’s infrastructure is creaking. But the solution there has as much to do with reforming Neanderthal funding systems as it does with the greater public spending he advocates. Too much of the "competitiveness" talk is a misconception—one mat justifies misguided policies, such as subsidies for green technology, and diverts attention from the country’s real to-do list.
(7)High on that list is sorting out America’s public finances. The budget deficit is huge and public debt, at over 90% of GDP when measured in an internationally comparable manner, is high and rising fast. Apart from Japan, America is the only big rich economy that does not have a plan for getting its public finances under control. The good news is that politicians are at last paying attention: deficit reduction is just about all anybody talks about in Washington, DC, these days. The bad news—and the second reason for gloom about what the politicians are up to—is that neither party is prepared to make the basic compromises mat are essential to a deal. Republicans refuse to accept that taxes will have to rise, Democrats that spending on "entitlements" such as health care and pensions must fall. No real progress is likely until after the next presidential election. And the antagonism of today’s deficit debate may even harm the economy, as Republicans push for excessive cuts in next year’s budget.
(8)Meanwhile, the biggest dangers lie in an area that politicians barely mention: the labour market. The recent decline in the jobless rate has been misleading, the result of a surprisingly small growth in the workforce(as discouraged workers drop out)as much as fast job creation. A stubborn 46% of America’s jobless, some 6 million people, have been out of work for more than six months. The weakness of the recovery is mostly to blame, but there are signs that America may be developing a distinctly European disease: structural unemployment.
(9)Youth unemployment is especially high, and joblessness among the young leaves lasting scars. Strong productivity growth has been achieved partly through the elimination of many mid-skilled jobs. And what makes this all the more worrying is that, below the radar screen, America had employment problems long before the recession, particularly for lesser-skilled men. These were caused not only by sweeping changes from technology and globalisation, which affect all countries, but also by America’s habit of locking up large numbers of young black men, which drastically diminishes their future employment prospects. America has a smaller fraction of prime-age men in work and in the labour force than any other G7 economy. Some 25% of men aged 25-54 with no college degree, 35% of high-school dropouts and almost 70% of black high-school dropouts are not working.
(10)All this means that grappling with entrenched joblessness deserves to be far higher on America’s policy agenda. Unfortunately, the few politicians who acknowledge the problem tend to have misguided solutions, such as trade barriers or industrial policy to prop up yesterday’s jobs or to spot tomorrow’s. That won’t work: government has a terrible record at picking winners. Instead, America needs to get its macro-medicine right, in particular by committing itself to medium-term fiscal and monetary stability without excessive short-term tightening. But it also needs job-market reforms, from streamlining and upgrading training to increasing employers’ incentives to hire the low-skilled. And stemming the decline in low-skilled men’s work will also demand more education reform to boost skills, as well as a saner approach to drugs and imprisonment.
The statement "On the plus side"(Para. 4)indicates the ______ of American economy.
选项
A、weakness
B、strength
C、prosperity
D、downhill
答案
B
解析
根据题干定位到第4段。该段第2句说任何一个大国都没有像美国这样的固有的长期优势,该句中的advantages和第3句(以But开头)中的weaknesses从正反两个方面说明On the plus side指的是美国经济的优势。因此本题应该选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/kXIK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Thelandofapplepieandbaseball—theUnitedStatesofAmerica.OfcourseweallknowthereismoretoAmericathanapplepie
Thelandofapplepieandbaseball—theUnitedStatesofAmerica.OfcourseweallknowthereismoretoAmericathanapplepie
Thelandofapplepieandbaseball—theUnitedStatesofAmerica.OfcourseweallknowthereismoretoAmericathanapplepie
Thelandofapplepieandbaseball—theUnitedStatesofAmerica.OfcourseweallknowthereismoretoAmericathanapplepie
AccordingtoUnitedStatesCoastGuardrequirements,lifepreserversmustbesimpleindesign,reversible,capableofbequickly
HereintheUnitedStates,beforeagriculturalactivitiesdestroyedthenaturalbalance,thereweregreatmigrationsofRocky
HereintheUnitedStates,beforeagriculturalactivitiesdestroyedthenaturalbalance,thereweregreatmigrationsofRocky
随机试题
对妊娠合并心脏病的产妇进行健康指导,内容不正确的是
患者女性,36岁。间断右下腹痛6个月,伴腹泻、发热,体温多波动于37~38℃。否认结核病史和肺结核密切接触史。查体右下腹可触及包块,可移动,有压痛,无反跳痛下列哪种说法正确
A.常发生在进大量油腻食物后B.常发生在未进油腻食物后C.暴饮暴食及过量饮酒后发生D.进食粗糙食物后E.进食大量蛋白质后胆囊炎与饮食的关系是
患者男,30岁。腹部撞伤4小时入院。查:四肢湿冷,腹肌紧张,全腹压痛、反跳痛,有移动性浊音,肠鸣音消失。该患者目前的处理不包括
(2013年)下列描述中,错误的是()。
李先生和胡先生两人进行房屋交换。李先生房产价值为150万元,胡先生房产价值为100万元。当地契税税率为3%。则下列说法正确的是()。
某电器生产企业为增值税一般纳税人,2019年度会计自行核算取得营业收入25000万元、营业外收入3000万元、投资收益1000万元,扣除营业成本12000万元、营业外支出1000万元、税金及附加300万元、管理费用6000万元、销售费用500
2012年6月22日,()回收至母船甲板,潜航员顺利出舱,完成本次海试第()次下潜。本次下潜最大深度6963米,取得矿物样本,生物样本,沉积物样本,深海水样。
红叶子理论认为:一个人职业的成功不在于红叶子的数目多少,而在于他是否具备一片特别硕大的红叶子,这片特别硕大的红叶子不是与生俱来的,需要根据个人优势不断努力才能获得。根据上述定义,下列哪项能用红叶子理论解释?
把下面的六个图形分为两类,使每一类图形都有各自的共同特征或规律,分类正确的一项是:
最新回复
(
0
)