首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinc
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinc
admin
2011-12-20
97
问题
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinctive activity. No other discipline has produced as much in such a short period. It is unclear yet how much of it will stand the test of time, but for sheer industry, the business school deserve credit. Not a day goes by without another wave of research papers, books, articles, and journals.
In these terms, schools have produced a generally accepted theoretical basis for management. When it comes to knowledge creation, however, they find themselves in difficulties. They are caught between the need for academic rigour and for real-world business relevance, which tend to pull in opposite directions. The desire to establish management as a credible discipline leads to research that panders to traditional academic criteria. The problem for business school researchers is that they seek the approval of their academic peers rather than the business community. In the United States this has led to the sort of grand ’paper clip counting’ exercises that meet demands for academic rigour but fail to add one iota to the real sum of human knowledge.
Business schools have too often allowed the constraints of the academic world to cloud their view of the real world. Business school researchers seek provable theories rather than helpful theories. They have championed a prescriptive approach to management based on analysis and, more recently, on fashionable ideas that soon disappear into the ether. The one best way approach encourages researchers to mould the idiosyncrasies of managerial reality into their tightly defined models of behaviour. Figures and statistics are fitted into linear equations and tidy models. Economists and other social scientists label this cure smoothing. Meanwhile, reality continually refuses to cooperate.
Central to this is the tension between relevance and rigour. In a perfect world, there would be no need to choose between the two. But in the business school world, the need to satisfy academic criteria and be published in journals often tilts the balance away from relevance. In other words, it is often easier to pursue quantifiable objectives than it is to add anything useful to the debate about management. To a large extent, the entire business school system works against useful, knowledge-creating research. Academics have five years in which to prove themselves if they are to make the academic grade. It seems long enough. But it can take two or even three years to get into a suitable journal. They therefore have around three years, probably less, to come up with an area of interest and carry out meaningful and original research. This is a demanding timescale. The temptation must be to slice up old data in new ways rather than pursue genuinely groundbreaking, innovative research.
It is a criticism also made by some business school insiders. "Academic journals tend to find more and more techniques for testing more and more obscure theories. They are asking trivial questions and answering them exactly. There has to be a backlash," says Julian Birkinshaw of London Business School. In large part, the problem goes back to a time when business schools were trying to establish themselves. Up until the 1960s, American business schools were dismissed as pseudo-academic institutions, including the universities of which they often formed a part, regarded them as a little more than vocational colleges. Since then, most of the leading schools have undergone major reassessments and introduced sweeping changes. However, it is questionable whether those changes have gone far enough.
In the second paragraph, the writer criticizes the theories of management produced by business schools for being ______.
选项
A、incomprehensible
B、contradictory
C、vague
D、inflexible
答案
D
解析
第二段第四句中,作者指出商业学校为了把管理学建设成一个完整的学科体系,而迎合传统的学术标准,所以是死板、不灵活的,选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/lDua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Legacy—supportagreement
targetlanguage
TheShapeofThingstoComeWhentheworldwasasimplerplace,therichwerefat,thepoorwerethin,andright-thinkingpeople
Thinkingaboutgoingoffthebeatenpathforyournextvacation?Ifso,youmightbeoneofthemanypeoplewhoareenjoyingar
中非合作论坛(ForumonChina-AfricaCooperation,简称FOCAC),是中华人民共和国和非洲国家之间在南南合作范畴内的集体对话机制,成立于2000。论坛的宗旨是平等【R21】________、增进了解、扩大【R22】_____
CanyoubelievethatIwonthephotocontestwiththe______ofthetwopicturesthatwasmostesthetic,eventhoughIonlytrie
Thesepictureswillshowyou______.
A______isagrowthoffeathers,furorskinalongthetopoftheheadsofsomeanimals,especiallybirds.
随机试题
尿毒症患者出现消化道症状的主要原因是
制作该修复体的可卸代型底座部分的石膏与工作模型石膏使用不同的颜色其目的是
水利水电工程施工企业管理人员安全生产考核合格证书有效期为()年。
有爆炸危险的生产部位,在进行平面布置时应满足()。
矿产、地质资源属于()。
根据《中华人民共和国信托法》,受托人以()为限向受益人承担支付信托利益的义务。
商品流通企业经营决策一般过程的第一步是()。
某银行保险柜被撬,巨额现金和证券失窃。警察局经过侦破,拘捕了三名重大的犯罪嫌疑人:施辛格,赖普顿和安杰士。通过审讯,查明了以下的事实:(1)保险柜是用专门的作案工具撬开的,使用这种工具必须受过专门的训练。(2)只有施辛格作案,安杰士才作案。(3)赖普
进度安排的常用图形描述方法有Gantt图和PERT图。Gantt图不能清晰地描述(18);PERT图可以给出哪些任务完成后才能开始另一些任务。下图所示的PERT图中,事件6的最晚开始时刻是(19)。
A、ShewillcallMr.Taylorinthenextfewdays.B、Shewilltalkovertheirdiscussionwithothers.C、Shewillnotcontacthimf
最新回复
(
0
)