首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinc
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinc
admin
2011-12-20
96
问题
In terms of pure quantity of research and debate, business schools have performed amazingly in promoting management as a distinctive activity. No other discipline has produced as much in such a short period. It is unclear yet how much of it will stand the test of time, but for sheer industry, the business school deserve credit. Not a day goes by without another wave of research papers, books, articles, and journals.
In these terms, schools have produced a generally accepted theoretical basis for management. When it comes to knowledge creation, however, they find themselves in difficulties. They are caught between the need for academic rigour and for real-world business relevance, which tend to pull in opposite directions. The desire to establish management as a credible discipline leads to research that panders to traditional academic criteria. The problem for business school researchers is that they seek the approval of their academic peers rather than the business community. In the United States this has led to the sort of grand ’paper clip counting’ exercises that meet demands for academic rigour but fail to add one iota to the real sum of human knowledge.
Business schools have too often allowed the constraints of the academic world to cloud their view of the real world. Business school researchers seek provable theories rather than helpful theories. They have championed a prescriptive approach to management based on analysis and, more recently, on fashionable ideas that soon disappear into the ether. The one best way approach encourages researchers to mould the idiosyncrasies of managerial reality into their tightly defined models of behaviour. Figures and statistics are fitted into linear equations and tidy models. Economists and other social scientists label this cure smoothing. Meanwhile, reality continually refuses to cooperate.
Central to this is the tension between relevance and rigour. In a perfect world, there would be no need to choose between the two. But in the business school world, the need to satisfy academic criteria and be published in journals often tilts the balance away from relevance. In other words, it is often easier to pursue quantifiable objectives than it is to add anything useful to the debate about management. To a large extent, the entire business school system works against useful, knowledge-creating research. Academics have five years in which to prove themselves if they are to make the academic grade. It seems long enough. But it can take two or even three years to get into a suitable journal. They therefore have around three years, probably less, to come up with an area of interest and carry out meaningful and original research. This is a demanding timescale. The temptation must be to slice up old data in new ways rather than pursue genuinely groundbreaking, innovative research.
It is a criticism also made by some business school insiders. "Academic journals tend to find more and more techniques for testing more and more obscure theories. They are asking trivial questions and answering them exactly. There has to be a backlash," says Julian Birkinshaw of London Business School. In large part, the problem goes back to a time when business schools were trying to establish themselves. Up until the 1960s, American business schools were dismissed as pseudo-academic institutions, including the universities of which they often formed a part, regarded them as a little more than vocational colleges. Since then, most of the leading schools have undergone major reassessments and introduced sweeping changes. However, it is questionable whether those changes have gone far enough.
In the second paragraph, the writer criticizes the theories of management produced by business schools for being ______.
选项
A、incomprehensible
B、contradictory
C、vague
D、inflexible
答案
D
解析
第二段第四句中,作者指出商业学校为了把管理学建设成一个完整的学科体系,而迎合传统的学术标准,所以是死板、不灵活的,选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/lDua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
theChinesecivilization
South—SouthConference
internationalcommonpractice
"Othercountrieshaveaclimate;inEnglandwehaveweather."Thisstatement,oftenmadebyEnglishmentodescribethepeculia
pyramidscheme
oxygenbar
Globalwarmingwasonceanuncommontermusedbyafewscientistswhoweregrowingconcernedovertheeffectsofdecadesofpoll
Awell-writtencomposition______goodchoiceofwordsandclearorganizationamongotherthings.
"Popularart"hasanumberofmeanings,impossibletodefinewithanyprecision,whichrangefromfolkloretojunk.Thepolesar
A______isagrowthoffeathers,furorskinalongthetopoftheheadsofsomeanimals,especiallybirds.
随机试题
严重呕吐引起代谢性碱中毒的机是
传染病区中属于半污染区的是
下列关于呕吐与进食的表述,正确的是
某化工厂在购进生产材料时.取得供货方虚开的增值税专用发票,经税务机构核实,属于善意取得。下列的陈述,符合规定的处理方法是()。
()是回答“怎么办”的知识,它所处理的对象是个人自身的认知活动,是个体调控自己认知活动的知识。
①连残荷也消逝的无影无踪②池塘里的荷叶虽然仍然是绿油油一片③好像是一下子从夏天转入秋天④但是看来变成残荷之日也不会太远了⑤再过一两个月,池水一结冰⑥连日来,天气突然变寒对上述语句排序正确的一项是:
教育研究的定量分析中最常用的反映离散趋势的差异量数是()
有以下程序main(){intk=5:while(--k)printf("%d",k-=3);printf("\n");}执行后的输出结果是
JeffBezosTakingthelongviewA)JeffBezos,thefounderandchiefexecutiveofAmazon,owesmuchofhissuccesstohisability
灾难
最新回复
(
0
)