首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they s
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they s
admin
2015-03-29
53
问题
A historic change is taking place in higher education. Professors are being held responsible as never before for how well they serve students. It has become as common in colleges and universities for students to grade professors as for professors to grade students.
In fact, student ratings have become the most widely used—and, in many cases, the only—source of information on teaching effectiveness. In comparing three studies of the same 600 four-year colleges, it was found that the number of colleges using student ratings to evaluate teachers had climbed from 29 percent to 68 percent. No other method of evaluation approached that degree of usage, and other studies have found similar results.
One reason that student evaluations of teachers have become so popular is that they are easy to administer and to score. But they also are easy to abuse. If they are to shed meaningful light on teachers’ performance, the ratings must be used in a way that reflects at least some of what we’ve learnt about them from research and from experience.
Research and experience have shown us, for example, that student ratings should never be the only basis for evaluating teaching effectiveness. There is much more to teaching than what is evaluated on student rating forms. When ratings are used, we know that students should not be expected to judge whether the materials used in a course are up to date or how well the teacher knows the subject matter of the course. These judgments require professional background and are best left to the professor’s colleagues. On the other hand, students should be asked to estimate what they have learned in a course, and to report on such things as a professor’s ability to communicate at the students’ level, professional behaviour in the classroom, relationship with students, and ability to arouse interest in the subject.
The central idea of the passage is that______.
选项
A、student ratings are the only source of information on teaching effectiveness
B、ratings have become the most widely used source of information on teaching effectiveness
C、besides student ratings, there are other methods to evaluate teachers
D、student ratings are very popular and should be properly used
答案
D
解析
本题询问文章的中心思想,答案应来自文章主题句或根据文章结构总结得出。纵览全文,作者一直在谈论学生评价体系,前两段讲述学生评价体系被广泛使用后两段讲述应如何科学地使用学生评价体系,因此本题答案为D)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/lKfK777K
本试题收录于:
浙江省大学英语三级题库大学英语三级分类
0
浙江省大学英语三级
大学英语三级
相关试题推荐
Einsteinwasamanofuncommonly______intelligence.Hediscoveredwhatfewpeoplecoulddo.
WhenIwasachild,myfamilyusedtogoonholidayeveryyeartovisitourrelativesinthenorth-eastofEngland.Oneofthem
WhenIwasachild,myfamilyusedtogoonholidayeveryyeartovisitourrelativesinthenorth-eastofEngland.Oneofthem
What’stherangeofyuanfluctuationwithinatradingday?
Look!The______upatthelake______justbreathtaking.
Softpoweristheabilityofacountrytoshapeothercountries’views,attitudes,perceptionsandactionswithoutforceor【D6
A、£16.50.B、£12.50.C、£10.D、£15.D题干问男士门票的价格。通过对话内容可知,女士说前排和包厢最责,为16.50英镑。正厅中间的座位售价为15英镑,三个后排座位售价为12.50英镑。男士要一个中间的座位。故选D。
随机试题
以下属收敛止血药的是( )
阳偏衰的病机,主要是指
建筑安装直接工程费中的直接费包括现场管理费、材料费和施工机械使用费。()
以下属于种群特征的是()。
建筑管道系统的试验类型主要有()。
以下属于狭义货币的有()。
某企业2011年3月份的“材料成本差异明细账”如下表所示(计算保留两位小数):根据“材料成本差异明细账”中的数据可知,该企业3月份存在的问题是()。
()属于现代人力资源管理的基本原理。
在VisualFoxPro中,下面关于属性、方法和事件的叙述错误的是
"Thelandofthefreeandthehomeofthebrave,"theseclosingwordsoftheU.S.nationalanthem,"TheStarSpangledBanner"(星
最新回复
(
0
)