2. 考研
  3. In order to "change lives for the better" and reduce "dependency", George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, introduced the "

In order to "change lives for the better" and reduce "dependency", George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, introduced the "

admin2017-01-17  24
问题     In order to "change lives for the better" and reduce "dependency", George Osborne, Chancellor of the Exchequer, introduced the "upfront work search" scheme. Only if the jobless arrive at the jobcentre with a CV, register for online job search, and start looking for work will they be eligible for benefit—and then they should report weekly rather than fortnightly. What could be more reasonable?
    More apparent reasonableness followed. There will now be a seven-day wait for the jobseeker’s allowance. "Those first few days should be spent looking for work, not looking to sign on," he claimed. "We’re doing these things because we know they help people stay off benefits and help those on benefits get into work faster" Help? Really? On first hearing, this was the socially concerned chancellor, trying to change lives for the better, complete with "reforms" to an obviously indulgent system that demands too little effort from the newly unemployed to find work, and subsidises laziness. What motivated him, we were to understand, was his zeal for "fundamental fairness"—protecting the taxpayer, controlling spending and ensuring that only the most deserving claimants received their benefits.
    Losing a job is hurting: you don’t skip down to the jobcentre with a song in your heart, delighted at the prospect of doubling your income from the generous state. It is financially terrifying, psychologically embarrassing and you know that support is minimal and extraordinarily hard to get. You are now not wanted; you are now excluded from the work environment that offers purpose and structure in your life. Worse, the crucial income to feed yourself and your family and pay the bills has disappeared. Ask anyone newly unemployed what they want and the answer is always: a job.
    But in Osborneland, your first instinct is to fall into dependency—permanent dependency if you can get it—supported by a state only too ready to indulge your falsehood. It is as though 20 years of ever-tougher reforms of the job search and benefit administration system never happened. The principle of British welfare is no longer that you can insure yourself against the risk of unemployment and receive unconditional payments if the disaster happens. Even the very phrase "jobseeker’s allowance" is about redefining the unemployed as a "jobseeker" who had no fundamental right to a benefit he or she has earned through making national insurance contributions. Instead, the claimant receives a time-limited "allowance," conditional on actively seeking a job; no entitlement and no insurance, at ￡71.70 a week, one of the least generous in the EU.
The phrase "to sign on" (Para. 2) most probably means
选项 A、to check on the availability of jobs at the jobcentre.
B、to accept the government’s restrictions on the allowance.
C、to register for an allowance from the government.
D、to attend a governmental job-training program.
答案C
解析 含义题。根据题于信息定位到第二段。由第三句Those first few days should be spent looking for work，not looking to sign on可推断出答案应与looking for work语意相反。C项“注册享受政府补贴”，与找工作正好相对，为正确答案。A项“在就业中心寻找工作机会”与looking for work意思一致，所以不能选。B项“接受政府补贴的限制条件”跟找工作没有必然的对立关系。D项“参加政府的就业培训项目”文中并未提到。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/lhEZ777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)