首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
10
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
According to the author, all the students know that ______. ( )
选项
A、there are great differences among the lecturers as to their quality of teaching
B、quite a lot of teachers can produce the results students desire
C、they must be inspired to learn
D、it is too dull to attend lectures
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/m5qC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Insteadofresearchingandwritingtheirpapers,somestudents______.UsingtheprogramdevelopedatUniversityofCalifornia
Theheadmasteroftheschoolhadthesupportofa______numberofparents.
You’dbetterhurry,______youmightbelateforclass.
Maxhasno______(appreciate)ofthefinerthingsinlife.
Forthispartyouareallowed30minutestowriteacompositiononthetopic:TheLifeontheInternet.Youshouldwritenoless
Americansenjoyfastfoodmainlybecause______.Itcanbeinferredthatchildren______.
(怪不得)hespeaksEnglishfluently.HeoftencommunicateswithforeignersinEnglish.
Foryears,childrenintheindustrialareasofEuropeandAmericaseldomlefttheirsmokycitiestoseethebeautiesofthecoun
_______roomsarebothlargeandcomfortable.
随机试题
下列关于法律关系主体的说法,正确的是()。
甲是某新华书店的经理,了解到某英语教材十分畅销,于是擅自以该新华书店的名义在某印刷厂印制了他人享有专有出版权的该教材25万套,非法经营额达到350余万元,非法所得100余万元,全部据为已有。对甲的行为:
减小梁裂缝宽度的最有效措施是:
项目的()是项目的实际投资。
课堂教学中陈旧的教学模式,落后的教学方法,有碍学生创新精神的培养。随着教育改革的深入,教学方式、教师的角色、学生的地位等都发生了很大的变化。将教师讲、学生听的“一言堂”式教学,变为师生互动、相互促进的合作式教学;学生变为课堂的主体,学生变为积极的
1985年邓小平说“改革是中国的第二次革命”,其本质含义是()
Man:HowdidyougotoCanada,Jane?Didyoufly?Woman:Iwasplanningto,becauseit’ssuchalongtripbybusorbytrain.Bu
Thecompanyissoold-fashionedandopposedtoinnovationthatitcanseemdownright________.A.antediluvianB.flightyC.arch
It______aboutseveno’clockwhenTomreturnedhomeforitwasalreadydarkoutside.
TodayIwouldliketotalkabouttheearlydaysofmoviemakinginthelatenineteenthandearly【B1】______centuries.Beforet
最新回复
(
0
)