首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
16
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
According to the author, all the students know that ______. ( )
选项
A、there are great differences among the lecturers as to their quality of teaching
B、quite a lot of teachers can produce the results students desire
C、they must be inspired to learn
D、it is too dull to attend lectures
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/m5qC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Hehas______variousadventures.
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteacompositiononthetopic:TurnOffYourMobilePhone.Youshouldwriteatl
Thisresearchhasattractedwidecoverageinthe______andhasfeaturedonBBCtelevision’sTomorrow’sWorld.
Accordingtothepassage,goodteachersshould______.Whatarestudentsexpectedtodobeforeattendingaclass?
InmanyAmericanfamilies,parentsfeelthatchildrenshouldmakeimportantdecisions______.
Thisoldpicture(remindedherofthosedaysspentinthecountryside).
Ithasbeengenerallyrecognizedthatayoungster’ssocialdevelopmenthasaprofoundeffectonhisacademicprogress.Children
Youarerequiredtowriteacompositiononthefollowingtopicwithin30minutes:CompetitionandCooperationbasedontheoutli
MostpeopleagreethatthepresentroleofwomenhasalreadyaffectedU.S.society.______,ithasaffectedthetraditionalro
Thereareseveralmeansofmasscommunication.Thenewspaperisone.Televisionis______.
随机试题
某企业销售商品,年赊销额为500万元,信用条件为(2/10,1/20,n/40),预计将会有60%客户享受2%的现金折扣,30%的客户享受1%的现金折扣,其余的客户均在信用期付款,则该企业应收账款平均收账天数为【】
—Whatdoesyourbrotherlooklike?______.
下列选项中,描述肿瘤免疫反应正确的是
给脑出血患者静脉输入甘露醇,其目的是
企业确实无法支的应付账款,应计入()科目。
在资本主义制度下,工人劳动一段时间后,资本家支付给工人一定数量的工资,其工资的本质是()。
在法国印象派中,以画人物著称的画家有__________、__________和__________;以画风景著称的画家有__________、__________和__________。
[A]Physicalchanges[B]Lowself-esteem[C]Emergingindependenceandsearchforidentity[D]Emotionalturbulence[E]Interestint
Wheredidthewomangoforholidaylastyear?
A.exceptionB.ultimatelyC.embarrassD.conceptsE.toleranceF.oppressG.targetH.adaptableI.stressedJ.temporaril
最新回复
(
0
)