首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
18
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
According to the author, all the students know that ______. ( )
选项
A、there are great differences among the lecturers as to their quality of teaching
B、quite a lot of teachers can produce the results students desire
C、they must be inspired to learn
D、it is too dull to attend lectures
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/m5qC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Before1914femalesecretarieswererarebecausethey______.Secretaries,untilrecently,hadtodoalotofworknowdoneby
Thefirstsailorpretendedtobeillbecausehewantedto______.Thepatientsfeltbetterquicklybecause______.
Itoldhimhowtogethere,butperhapsIshouldhavegivenhimamap.
Accordingtotheauthor,reallygoodscience______.Itcanbeinferredfromthepassagethatscientistsofthe18thcentury__
I______thepaperafterlunch:That’soneofthethingsIreallyenjoy.
IntheUnitedStates,teachingisveryimportant.Ifteachersdonotteachwell,studentscomplain.Ifmanystudentsdonotunde
AccordingtotheAmericanfederalgovernment,residentsofHawaiihavethelongestlife______:77.2years.
______thegovernmentagreestogiveextramoney,thetheatrewillhavetobeclosednextmonth.
—Howdoyou______wegotoBeijingforourHolidays?—Ithinkwe’dbetterflythereIt’smuchcomfortable.
Mr.Smithgavehiswifetenpoundforherbirthday--tenprettypoundnotes.Sothedayafterherbirthday,MrsSmithwentshoppi
随机试题
对尿失禁病人的护理中哪项是错误的( )
增加击实功,可提高土的最大干密度。()
主生产计划列出()在计划期内不同时间段的需求量。
下列各句中,没有语病的一句是()。
我国古代教育家苟子说“蓬生麻中,不扶自直;白沙在涅,与之俱黑”,这强调的是()因素对人的潜移默化的作用。
时间:速度
有黑、白棋子共300枚,按每堆3枚分成100堆,其中只有1枚白子的共27堆,有2枚或3枚黑子的共42堆,有3枚白子的与有3枚黑子的堆数相等,那么全部棋子中,白子共有多少枚?
西安事变中,蒋介石最终接受停止内战,联共抗日的主张,其主要原因是()。
A、 B、 C、 D、 B
某国商业银行体系共持有准备金300亿元,公众持有的通货数量为100亿元。中央银行对活期存款和非个人定期存款规定的法定准备率分别为15%和10%,据测算,流通中的现金漏损率为25%,商业银行的超额准备率为5%,而非个人定期存款比率为50%。试求:活期存款乘数
最新回复
(
0
)