Britain’s private schools are one of its most successful exports. The children of the well-heeled flock to them, whether from Ch

admin2018-06-28  20

问题    Britain’s private schools are one of its most successful exports. The children of the well-heeled flock to them, whether from China, Nigeria or Russia: the number of foreign pupils rose by 1. 4% in the last year alone. One headmaster recently asked a room full of pupils whether they flew business class to Britain. Only a few hands went up, suggesting they were not quite as spoiled as he had thought. Then a boy explained; many of the pupils fly first class instead.
   Yet foreign students, whether educated in British private schools or elsewhere, are decreasingly likely to go to English universities. According to the Higher Education Funding Council for England, 307,200 overseas students began their studies in the country in 2012-2013, down from 312,000 two years earlier and the first drop in 29 years. Student numbers from the rest of the EU fell—probably a result of the increase in annual tuition fees in England from 6,000 a year to 9,000. But arrivals from India and Pakistan declined most sharply.
   In contrast to the visa regime for private schools, which is extremely lax (the Home Office counts private schools as favoured sponsors) , student visas have been tightened. Foreign students used to be allowed to work for up to two years after graduating. They now have only four months to find a job paying upwards of 20,600 if they want to stay in Britain.
   This change was intended to deal with sham colleges that were in effect offering two-year work visas. But it seems to have put off serious students too. Nick Hillman of the Higher Education Policy Institute says the government has sent unclear messages about the sort of immigration it wants to restrict. An emphasis on holding down net immigration influences young Indians and Pakistanis in particular. Australia and America, which have more relaxed entry criteria for students, are becoming more favoured destinations. Colin Riordan, Cardiff University’s vice-chancellor, adds that Britain’s student-visa regime has become more strict and difficult.
   As a result, Britain is losing out to other countries in the contest for talent—an oddity, given how often the prime minister bangs on about the " global race". Its unwelcoming standpoint will harm its long-term prospects. And the drift of foreign students from leading British private schools to American colleges may have another, somewhat happier, consequence: America might become rather better at cricket.
The author holds that Britain’s current student-visa regime may______.

选项 A、deprive the country of foreign elites
B、lose both domestic and foreign talents
C、harm its long-term economic prospects
D、lose its advantage in sports competition

答案A

解析 观点题。题干Britain’s current student-visa regime对应第四段尾句,而第五段体现作者观点,强调英国当前的学生签证制度带来的结果,故答案锁定第五段。选项[A]deprive the country of foreign elites“使国家失去外国精英”;该项对应首句:As a result,Britain is losing out to other countries in the contest for talent…其中talent强调的是文章讨论的“留学生”,即“外国人才”。该项的deprive=lose;elites=talent;故该项表达正确。[B]lose both domestic and foreign talents“失去国内外人才”;该项错在domestic“国内的”一词,文章从头到尾都在讨论留学生,从没有提到本国的人才,故该项错误。[C]harm its long-term economic prospects“不利于长远经济前景”:原文第二句提到harm its long-term prospects,该项多出economic一词,属于偷换概念。[D]lose its advantage in sports competition“在体育比赛中失去优势”;该项与最后一句有关,文章提到cricket“板球”运动,该项变成sports competition“体育比赛”,属于明显的夸大范围。综上,本题选择[A]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/mA6Z777K
0

最新回复(0)