首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
For years the media, food labels, dietitians, and even scientists who should know better have bombarded (轰炸) us with advice to l
For years the media, food labels, dietitians, and even scientists who should know better have bombarded (轰炸) us with advice to l
admin
2013-05-04
65
问题
For years the media, food labels, dietitians, and even scientists who should know better have bombarded (轰炸) us with advice to load up on antioxidants: compounds found mostly in fruits and vegetables that mop up free radicals, which are highly reactive clusters of atoms that have been fingered as the evil-doers responsible for aging and for illnesses from cancer to heart disease.
Not so fast. First, studies piled up showing that taking antioxidants—even such common and seemingly harmless ones as vitamins C and E—as supplements was not beneficial to health and might even be dangerous. Many of the free radicals that are neutralized by antioxidants perform valuable functions in the body. The most important:fighting toxins (毒素) and fighting cancer. Maybe it’s not such an excellent idea to flood the body with something that neutralizes these warriors of the immune system. Or as British chemist and science writer David Bradley noted in his blog,Reactive Reports,"It’s always struck: me as odd that you would want to absorb extra antioxidants anyway, given that oxidizing agents are at the front-line of immune defense against pathogens (病原体) and cancer cells...Suffice to say that taking antioxidant supplements... may not necessarily be good for your health if you already have health problems, especially cancer or an infection. "
The first hints that the trend was crashing came from the hundreds of studies that have tried to assess the health effects of antioxidant supplements. The results have not been pretty. In 2008 the Cochrane Collaboration, an international organization of scientists who assess medical research, carefully checked 67 studies with nearly 400,000 participants. The goal;to determine whether antioxidant supplements reduce mortality in either healthy people or in people with diseases. Conclusion:" We found no evidence to support antioxidant supplements for primary or secondary prevention, and Vitamin A and E may increase mortality. " In analyses of antioxidant supplements and Lou Gehrig’s disease, Alzheimer’s or mild cognitive impairment, and lung cancer, the Cochrane scientists’ verdict was the same: no. And each analysis had an alarming refrain about increasing overall mortality.
It’s not clear why antioxidants in supplement form might be so dangerous. One idea holds that at high doses they become pro-oxidants,stimulating the harmful DNA- and cell-damaging reactions they’re supposed to prevent. But a more likely explanation is that we are seeing the human version of what scientists are finding in studies of lab animals: antioxidants interfere with immune-system cells that fight infection and cancer.
From the end of the passage,we can infer that______.
选项
A、antioxidants can destroy human immune system
B、antioxidants can damage animal immune system
C、most research results are based on lab animals
D、we need to do more researches on lab animals
答案
C
解析
推理判断题。定位句指出,我们关于抗氧化物补充剂对人体有害的结论源于实验室动物,抗氧化物补充剂干扰了它们对抗感染和癌症的免疫系统。因此,C)“很多研究成果是基于实验室动物的”,符合题意,故为本题答案。A)“抗氧化物可以破坏人类的免疫系统”、B)“抗氧化物可以破坏动物的免疫系统”均不符合原文,故排除;D)“我们需要在动物身上做更多的研究”,原文未提及,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/mDB7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、It’stoolateforthemantofindatutor.B、Shehasn’tpreparedforthemidtermexameither.C、Themanshouldn’thirethesam
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledEducationinRuralAreas.Youshouldwriteatleast15
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledIstheEntityBookstoreDying?Youshouldwriteatlea
A、Thingsstoredinall-metalcansshouldbediscarded.B、Swollenorrustedcanscanstillbeusedaftercleaned.C、Unopenedcans
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledDueAttentionShouldBeGiventoHandwriting.Youshou
A、Thetotalofthetestscoreiswrong.B、Somepartsaremarkedwrong.C、Somepartsshouldbemarkedright.D、Hehasnoideahow
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledMyViewonMassBlessingMessages.Youshouldwriteat
随机试题
什么是走向线和走向?走向标志着什么?它有几个值?相差的度数是多少?
一个流程由流程线、物料流向、名称及物料的来源和去向构成。
患者男,57岁。因严重肝病导致昏迷,呼吸微弱,浅而慢。护士为其测量呼吸的正确方法是()
下列项目中不属于营业外支出的是()。
商业银行在理财工作中必须建立健全有关规章制度和内部审核程序,并对()进行全面规范。
宏观经济政策的目标是()。
下列有关书法艺术的表述,正确的是()。
一种产品的价值由其质量与价格之间的比率决定。一种产品的价值越高,其会处于越好的竞争地位。所以对于既定产品而言或者通过提高质量,或者通过降低价格,都会提高消费者选择这种产品而不选择竞争性产品的概率。下面哪项,如果正确,最能支持以上得出的结论?
空想社会主义思潮经历了若干个历史发展阶段,其中成为科学社会主义的直接思想来源的是
Howmenfirstlearnedtoinventwordsisunknown;inotherwords,theoriginoflanguageisamystery.Allwereallyknowistha
最新回复
(
0
)