首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
admin
2010-05-14
51
问题
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish population is in shrinking. The study, the National Jewish Population Survey, found 5.2 million Jews living in the United States in 2000, a drop of 5 percent, or 300,000 people, since a similar study in 1990. What’s truly startling is that the reported decline is not tree. Worse still, the sponsor of the $6 million study, United Jewish Communities, knows it.
Both it and the authors have openly admitted their doubts. They have acknowledged in interviews that the population totals for 2000 and 1990 were reached by different methods and are not directly comparable. The survey itself also cautions readers, in a dauntingly technical appendix, that judgment calls by the researchers may have led to an undercount. When the research director and project director were asked whether the data should be construed to indicate a declining Jewish population, they flatly answered no. In addition, other survey researchers interviewed pointed to other studies with population estimates as high as 6.7 million.
Despite all this, the two figures --5.2 million now, 5.5 million then --are listed by side in the survey, leaving the impression that the population has shrunk. The result, predictably, has been a rash of headlines trumpeting the illusionary decline, in turn touching off jeremiads by rabbis and moralists condemning the religious laxity behind it. Whether out of ideology, ego, incompetence or a combination of all three, the respected charity has invented a crisis.
United Jewish Communities is the coordinating body for a national network of Jewish philanthropies with combined budgets of $2 billion. Its population surveys carry huge weight in shaping community policy. This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm. The last one, conducted by a predecessor organization, found that 52 percent of American Jews who married between 1985 and 1990 did so outside the faith. That number was a fabrication produced by including marriages in which neither party was Jewish by anyone’s definition, including the researchers.
Its publication created a huge stir, inspiring anguished sermons, books and conferences. It put liberals on the defensive, emboldened conservatives who reject full integration into society and alienated ordinary folks by the increasingly xenophobic tone of Jewish communal culture. The new survey, to its credit, retracts that figure and offers the latest survey has spawned a panic created by the last one.
So why did the organization flawed figures once again? Some scholars who have studied the. survey believe the motivation then came partly out of a desire to shock straying Jews into greater observance. It’ s too early to tell if that’ s the case this time around. What is clear is the researchers did their job with little regard to how their data could be misconstrued. They used statistical models and question formats that, while internally sound, made the new survey incompatible with the previous one. For example, this time the researchers divided the population of 5.2 million into two groups--"highly involved" Jews and "people of Jewish background"- and posed most questions only to the first group. As a result, most findings about belief and observance refer only to a subgroup of American Jews, making comparisons to the past impossible.
We can’ t afford to wait a decade before these figures are revised. The false population decline must be corrected before it further sours communal discourse. The United Jewish Communities owes it to itself and its public to step forward and state plainly what it knows to be true: American Jews are not disappearing.
According to the passage, which of the following statements is NOT true about the National Jewish Population Survey?
选项
A、It found a decline of 300,000 Jews in ten years.
B、It was carded out by United Jewish Communities.
C、This is the first time United Jewish Communities has made mistakes in the population survey.
D、The reported decline is not reliable.
答案
C
解析
作者在第四段介绍了United Jewish Communities这一组织,并说到This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm.
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/mOqO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、Foodsecurity.B、Europe’sdebtcrisis.C、FarmproductivityinAsia.D、ApossibleGreekexitfromtheeuro-zone.C
TheremaybenothingmoreAmericanthanthehome-mortgagedeductionwhichcameintobeingin1913—twoyearsbeforetheNewYork
Ifirstly【B1】______towritetheletterwhentheproducercalledbecauseFOOCwasaboutotherpeople’s【B2】______and【B3】______.
EatingouthasbecomeasAmericanasapplepie,butforthosemanningthekitchen,restaurantworkisanythingbutanAmericand
Backin【B1】______,civilwarbrokeoutinBurundi.Manywerekilledina【B2】______ofinter-ethnicviolence.Thismonth,Bur
A、Complainagainstthepoliceofficer.B、Trytofindasolutionandhelpthewoman.C、Communicatewithotherwitnesses.D、Findt
A、Annualmembershipforthefuture.B、Yearlymembershipfornow.C、Quartermembershipforthefuture.D、Seasonalmembershipfor
TotheoneBritishcoupleinseventhathasproblemsconceiving,twinssoundlikeadreamcometrue.Sowhenwould-beparentstu
1Oneargumentusedtosupporttheideathatemploymentwillcontinuetobethedominantformofwork,andthatemploymentw
TheIndependenceDayis_____.
随机试题
金融风险管理的基本原则包括()。
阴道毛滴虫最适宜生长繁殖的pH值为()
市长和市政府在办理中央事务方面,不受市议会监督的国家是【】
苯海拉明和异丙嗪的共同作用有:
A.电离室B.闪烁探测器C.半导体探测器D.CaSO4热释光剂量元件E.a径迹(片)在辐射测量中,常用的气体探测器是
A.5个工作日B.10个工作日C.15个工作日D.20个工作日E.30个工作日医疗机构要变更《医疗机构制剂许可证》许可事项,原审核、批准机关应当自收到申请之日起作出决定的期限为()
()是指安全生产法等有关法律、行政法规和规章规定的从事矿山和危险物品生产经营活动的生产经营单位及其主要负责人和其他主管人员。
在员工素质测评量化中,()可以被看作二次量化。
李老师发现一些学生卫生习惯不好,经常在教室里面乱扔废纸。面对这种情况,李老师恰当的做法是()。
历史证明,中国的民族民主革命要取得彻底的胜利,必须()。
最新回复
(
0
)