首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The (Non) Risks of Mobile Phones Do mobile phones cause explosions at petrol stations? That question has just been exhaustiv
The (Non) Risks of Mobile Phones Do mobile phones cause explosions at petrol stations? That question has just been exhaustiv
admin
2013-07-11
76
问题
The (Non) Risks of Mobile Phones
Do mobile phones cause explosions at petrol stations? That question has just been exhaustively answered by Adam Burgess, a researcher at the University of Kent, in England. Oddly, however, Dr.Burgess is not a physicist, but a sociologist. For the concern rests not on scientific evidence of any danger, but is instead the result of sociological factors: it is an urban myth, supported and propagated by official sources, but no less a myth for that. Dr. Burgess presented his findings this week at the annual conference of the British Sociological Association.
Mobile phones started to become widespread in the late 1980s, when the oil industry was in the middle of a concerted safety drive, Dr. Burgess notes. This was, in large part, a response to the Piper Alpha disaster in 1988, when 167 people died in an explosion on an Oil platform off the Scottish coast. The safety drive did not apply merely to offshore operations, employees at some British oil-company offices are now required to use handrails while walking up and down stairs, for example. So nobody questioned the precautionary ban on the use of mobile phones at petrol stations. The worry was that an electrical spark might ignite explosive fumes.
By the late 1990s, however, phone makers having conducted their own research realised that there was no danger of phones causing explosions since they could not generate the required sparks. But it was too late. The myth had taken hold.
One problem, says Dr. Burgess, is that the number of petrol-station fires increased in the late 1990s, just as mobile phones were proliferating. Richard Coates, BP’s fire-safety adviser, investigated many of the 243 such fires that occurred around the world between 1993 and 2004. He concluded that most were indeed caused by sparks igniting petrol vapour, but the sparks themselves were the result of static electricity, not electrical equipment. Most drivers will have experienced a mild electric shock when climbing out of their vehicles. It is caused by friction between driver and seat, with the result that both end up electrically charged. When the driver touches the metal frame of the vehicle, the result is sometimes a spark.
A further complication was the rise of the internet, where hoax memos, many claiming to originate from oil companies, warned of the danger of using mobile phones in petrol stations. Such memos generally explain static fires quite accurately, but mistakenly attribute them to mobile phones. Official denials, says Dr. Burgess, simply inflame the suspicions of conspiracy theorists.
Despite the lack of evidence that mobile phones can cause explosions, bans remain in place around the world, though the rules vary widely. For Dr. Burgess, such concerns are part of a broader pattern of unease about mobile phones. There is a curious discrepancy, he notes, between the way that such phones have become indispensable, and the fact that they are also vaguely considered to be dangerous. The safety of mobile phones would appear to be not so much the province of the hard science of physics, as of the soft science of sociology.
Which of the following has contributed to the suspicion that mobile phones are not safe?
选项
A、The lack of response from phone manufacturers.
B、Increase in the number of petrol-stations.
C、Misinformation spread over the internet.
D、Official effort to disguise the truth.
答案
C
解析
本题考查推理引申。第五段指出,由于网络上欺骗性备忘录的出现,使有关手机的谣言变得更为复杂,因此可知[C]是促使人们怀疑手机安全性的因素之_。[A]错在thelack of,由第三段可知,手机生产者并不是没有反应,而是反应得太晚,无法阻止已经传播开来的传言。原文第四段首句提到的是“加油站火灾数量的增加”,[B]项偷梁换柱,为错误项。[D]具有干扰性,因为第五段末句提到,官方的否认只会加剧阴谋理论家的怀疑。但对这句话的理解要联系上文。上文论述“网络传播手机爆炸的谣言”,最后一句接着指出“官方否认备忘录中有关手机引起火灾的说法,只会加重怀疑”。这里否认的并不是“事实”,排除[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/me4O777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
ThefirstEnglishcolonyinAmericaestablishedin
ThingstobeTaughtinEverySchoolⅠ.Introduction:Importanceofstudents’abilitytodealwiththerealworld.A.Speake
WhichofthefollowingisNOTusuallyconsideredasastem?
Oncefound"almostentirelyinthewesternUnitedStatesandinAsia,dinosaurfossilsarenowbeingdiscoveredonallsevencon
ThetasteoftheEnglishinthecultivationofland,andinwhatiscalledlandscapegardening,isunrivalled.Theyhavestudied
Buttheworstofitisn’tsociety’swork-ethicmorality;it’syourown,whichyouneverknewyouhad.Youfindouthowmuch
WhendidGeorgeW.BushpresentalettertoCongress?
Accordingtothenewresearch,theoddshapemoundswereformedby______.
Recently,Ihaveheardtwostoriesregardingtheautomobilesector.ThesalesofaSino-USjointventurehaveincreasedsignific
Newcastleintheidiomof"takecoalstoNewcastle"istheportcityof
随机试题
A.异烟肼、吡嗪酰胺B.左旋氧氟沙星C.链霉素D.糖皮质激素E.利福平上述哪种药物在初治结核患者中易引起类赫氏反应(暂时性恶化)
A、大青叶B、板蓝根C、野菊花D、鱼腥草E、白头翁长于凉血止痢的药物是()。
患儿,10个月,阵发性哭闹,被诊断为“肠套叠”,大便的颜色为
甲公司拥有一项汽车仪表盘的发明专利,其权利要求记载的必要技术特征可以分解为a+b+c+d共四项。乙公司制造四种仪表盘,其必要技术特征可以作四种分解,甲公司与乙公司的必要技术特征所代表的字母相同,表明其相应的必要技术特征相同或等同。乙公司的哪项技术侵犯了甲公
(2009年)研究船体在水中航行的受力试验,其模型设计应采用()。
陆先生目前每月工资5000元。公司有两套员工激励方案:甲方案是“双薪”,即年底多发一个月工资5000元;乙方案是发放年终奖5000元。根据案例,回答以下问题。根据前面两题的计算结果,采用乙方案可比甲方案节税()元。
保险兼业代理人可以代理再保险业务。()
促销的手段主要有()。
构成挪用公款罪的行为有()。
Testinghasreplacedteachinginmostpublicschools.Myownchildren’sschoolweekisframedbypretests,drills,tests,andre
最新回复
(
0
)