首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
19
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
The passage mainly discusses ______. ( )
选项
A、who are to evaluate teachers’ lecturing
B、how to promote teachers
C、how to give lectures in classes
D、how to help improve teachers’ lecturing techniques
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/n5qC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Itisastonishingthatapersonofyourintelligence______becheatedsoeasily.
Don’tworry,Ihavealready______them______thedecision.
Shehadatenseexpressiononherface,______shewereexpectingtrouble.
Personalinterviewingisusuallyusedwhentheinformationneededistoocomplextobegatheredbyanothertechnique,
Thepriceofmeatisalreadydown______fromwhatitwasayearago.
Whatkindsofthingshaveactivistsdonetoprotectresearchanimals?Whatwillhappeniftheresearchersdon’tmeetthedemand
A、hourB、honorC、honorD、honestC
______thegovernmentagreestogiveextramoney,thetheatrewillhavetobeclosednextmonth.
—Howabouteighto’clockoutsidethecinema?—That______mefine.
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguesbyblackeningthecorresp
随机试题
冯某为甲公司的高级工程师,携带甲公司的商业秘密文件与朋友曾某聚会,不慎将该文件丢在曾某处。之后,曾某自称拥有该商业秘密的所有权,并将该商业秘密以合理的价格卖给不知情的乙公司。以下判断正确的是()
制作锤造冠代型时,在模型的基牙上通常采用加蜡的方法恢复其外形和邻接关系,不应加蜡的部位为
申报日期栏应填______。进口口岸应填______。
下列不属于学校心理健康教育目标的是()。
公安机关通缉的对象是()。
声誉磁场是指声誉就像磁铁一样帮助企业吸引各种资源。事实上,声誉不仅像磁铁,而且能产生持久的磁场效应。这种效应不仅包括形成给企业带来效益的利益相关者的吸附效应,而且产生了吸引高质量利益相关者的筛选效应和自我加强效应。此中的声誉是指企业利益相关者(顾客、供应商
编号为1-50的选手参加一个爬楼比赛,楼高为60层。所有选手在第1层均获得一个特别的号牌,此后每经过一个楼层,如果选手的编号正好是楼层数的整数倍,就将得到一个特别的号牌。所有选手都到达终点后,正好持有3个特别号牌的选手有多少人?
A、接客人B、坐飞机C、送客人A
•ReadthearticlebelowaboutThomasKingsley.•Choosethecorrectwordtofilleachgap,fromA,BorCbelow.•Foreachque
Thecomfortzoneisourliving,work,andsocialenvironmentsthatwehavegrownaccustomedto.Itdeterminesthetypeoffriend
最新回复
(
0
)