首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
21
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
The passage mainly discusses ______. ( )
选项
A、who are to evaluate teachers’ lecturing
B、how to promote teachers
C、how to give lectures in classes
D、how to help improve teachers’ lecturing techniques
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/n5qC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Insteadofresearchingandwritingtheirpapers,somestudents______.UsingtheprogramdevelopedatUniversityofCalifornia
Generallyspeaking,allkindsofmaterialswillexpandwhenheatedbutwill______whencooled.
Therapiddevelopmentofcommunicationstechnologyistransformingthe______inwhichpeoplecommunicateacrosstimeandspace.
Apartfromthesesciencesthereisphilosophy,about______wewilltalkindetaillater.
Itmayalsohaveadditionalinterestandvaluebecauseofitsrelationshiptoahistoricalperiodortosomewell-knownperson.
Theexpressiononherface______methatshewaslying.
Largemoderncitiesaretoobigtocontrol.Theyimposetheirownlivingconditionsonthepeoplewhoinhabitthem.City-dweller
Youarerequiredtowriteacompositiononthefollowingtopicwithin30minutes:CompetitionandCooperationbasedontheoutli
A、hourB、honorC、honorD、honestC
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguesbyblackeningthecorresp
随机试题
AT细胞BB细胞C粒-单核细胞D巨核细胞E干细胞和祖细胞CD41a(GPⅡb/Ⅲa)、CD41b(Ⅱb)为哪种细胞的特异性标记
A.肾上腺素B.多巴胺C.去甲肾上腺素D.异丙肾上腺素E.酚妥拉明能激动α和β受体和外周DA受体,作用较肾上腺激素弱的是()
何女士提供三块木料给某家具厂订制一个衣柜,开工不久何女士觉得衣柜样式不够新潮,遂要求家具厂停止制作。家具厂认为这是个无理要求,便继续使用剩下两块木料,按原定式样做好了衣柜。下列说法哪些是正确的?
2016年7月,张某出资100万元,成立恒润有限责任公司(自然人独资),2017年8月,张某又出资设立复星制衣厂(个人独资企业),2018年6月,恒润公司欠刘某货款80万元,关于本案,下列哪一选项是正确的?
下面有关确认借款费用资本化金额的表述正确的有()。
以前我们总说,不要当书呆子。这句话今天理解起来有了更深的含义——不要光顾着读书上网看攻略,还要懂生活,知道地图怎么用,知道如何订餐,走出校门去实习就要对路况稍微熟悉点儿,至少能分清东西南北。这些事情看起来与职场无关,但能把它们做好,足以让你在实习阶段脱颖而
去年建成今年销售的房地产和今年建成已销售的房地产均计入今年的GDP。()
以下4个选项中,不能看作一条语句的是
(66)Clonaid,acompanyassociatedbyagroupthatbelievesextraterrestrialscreatedmankind,announcedFridaythatithadprod
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteacompositionofnolessthan150wordsunderthetitleof"AnUnforgettable
最新回复
(
0
)