首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
28
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
The passage mainly discusses ______. ( )
选项
A、who are to evaluate teachers’ lecturing
B、how to promote teachers
C、how to give lectures in classes
D、how to help improve teachers’ lecturing techniques
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/n5qC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
(面对艰巨的任务),wehadbetteractonthesuggestionsmadeatthemeeting.
Therestofhislifeis______tothecauseofinternationalexchangeofvisitingscholars.
Areyouconscious______anyreasonwhyheshouldnotbeenrolledinthisuniversity?
WhendidFather’sDayofficiallybegintohavenationalpopularity?WhatwasthefirstreactionoftheBritishpublictowardsF
Workersinthefinearts______thoughtsandfeelingsthroughtheircreativeworks.
He______thegunbeneathahugebagbeforeenteringthecheckpointoftheairport.
Infact,anyonewhowouldchallengeanother’sopinionislikelytobebrandedintolerant.
Antiquefurniture______.Second-handgoodssometimesfillyouwithsadnessbecause______.
Dressingfashionablywasveryimportantinfourteenth-centurySpain.Thiswasespeciallytrueforanymanwhoconsideredhimself
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteacompositiononthefollowingtopic.Youshouldwriteatleast100-120words
随机试题
肺胀患者,喘息敛气,咳嗽痰多。胸膺满闷,畏风易汗。倦怠乏力,苔薄腻,脉滑。治法宜选用
某女患头痛数月,遇上感和月经来潮时疼痛加重,于是出于彻底检查的目的来院坚决要求作CT检查,被医师拒绝。医师开出脑电图检查单和请耳鼻喉科会诊单。患者大为不满。为形成正常医患关系,该医师应该
A.羚羊角B.葶苈子C.鳖甲D.豆蔻E.葛根需后下的饮片是()。
关于数据集中趋势的测度,下列说法错误的是()。
为扩大市场份额,经股东大会批准,甲公司2010年和2011年实施了并购和其他与关交易。(1)与并购交易相关的资料如下:①2010年5月20日,甲公司向B公司购买其所持有的C公司30%股权;以C公司2010年5月31日经评估确认的净资产值
心理因素对躯体疾病影响机制的解释包括()
第二自然段中加点的“由后以例前”的意思是()。作者认为半坡彩陶上的刻画具有文字性质,其理由是()。
【2011东北财经大学选择题第6题】有中国大陆背景的在境外注册、在香港上市的公司股票被称为()。
社会主义法律的运行过程包括的环节,下列哪个选项是正确的()
A、Atapublishinghouse.B、Atabookstore.C、Atasupermarket.D、InProfessorJordan’soffice.B男士说,他正在寻找Jordan教授写的市场营销学课本。女士说,恐
最新回复
(
0
)