首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
32
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
The passage mainly discusses ______. ( )
选项
A、who are to evaluate teachers’ lecturing
B、how to promote teachers
C、how to give lectures in classes
D、how to help improve teachers’ lecturing techniques
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/n5qC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
ItwasMonday,Mrs.Smith’sdogwashungry,buttherewasnotanymeatinthehouse.Consideringthattherewasnobetterwa
Hehas______variousadventures.
Thecurrent______istowardsmorepart-timeemployment.
Atornadois______.ThepersonwhofoundAmy’sbabywas______.
Personalqualitiesarepersonal______ofanindividual.Personalqualitiesarewhatmakeupone’s______.
Theauthorsayschildreninthecityseldomwenttothewoodsandthefieldsbecause______.Intheauthor’sopinion,youngpeo
MostpeopleagreethatthepresentroleofwomenhasalreadyaffectedU.S.society.______,ithasaffectedthetraditionalro
RomeoandJulietwasprobablywrittenin1595,whenShakespearewasayoung,successfulplaywright.Hehadalreadywrittencomed
Mr.Smithgavehiswifetenpoundforherbirthday--tenprettypoundnotes.Sothedayafterherbirthday,MrsSmithwentshoppi
Youseldomgotothecinemaontheweekends,______?
随机试题
男性,64岁,突发气喘、心慌2小时,高血压病史9年。检查:半卧位,血压200/120mmHg,心率126次/分,律不齐,双肺湿啰音,尿素氮24.2mmol/L,肌酐433μmol/L,血钾5.8mmol/L,诊断:高血压3级(很高危组),急性左心衰竭,肾功
正常肾动脉血管由肾门至肾皮质的分支顺序是
大量饮清水后,反射性地使抗利尿激素分泌减少,使水的重吸收减少,引起尿量增多的现象称为渗透性利尿。()
施工中发生不可抗力事件,承包人应迅速采取措施,并在不可抗力事件结束后( )小时内向工程师通报受灾情况和损失情况及预计清理和修复费用。
在设计和实施实质性分析程序时,注册会计师应当确定已记录金额与预期值之间不可接受的差异额。()
非正式群体是_____形成的。【】
下列做法中,没有违法的是()。
政府监管是市场经济条件下政府为实现某些公共政策目标,对微观经济主体进行的规范与制约,主要通过对特定产业和微观经济活动主体的进入、退出、资质、价格及涉及国民健康、生命安全、可持续发展等行为进行监督、管理来实现。根据上述定义,下列属于政府监管范围的是(
覆盖义齿(overdenture)
ImproveYourPublicSpeakingSkills1.Practiceina【T1】______environment【T1】______■Receivefeedbackabout
最新回复
(
0
)