首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A Sunshade for the Planet Even with the best will in the world, reducing our carbon emissions is not going to prevent global
A Sunshade for the Planet Even with the best will in the world, reducing our carbon emissions is not going to prevent global
admin
2011-01-05
38
问题
A Sunshade for the Planet
Even with the best will in the world, reducing our carbon emissions is not going to prevent global warming. It has become clear that even if we take the most strong measures to control emissions, the uncertainties (不确定) in our climate models still leave open the possibility of extreme warming and rises in sea level. At the same time, resistance by governments and special interest groups makes it quite possible that the actions suggested by climate scientists might not be implemented (执行) soon enough.
Fortunately, if the worst comes to the worst, scientists still have a few tricks up their sleeves. For the most part they have strongly resisted discussing these options for fear of inviting a sense of complacency that might thwart efforts to tackle the root of the problem. Until now, that is. A growing number of researchers are taking a fresh look at large-scale "geoengineering" projects that might be used to counteract (抵消) global warming. "I use the analogy of methadone, " says Stephen Schneider, a climate researcher at Stanford University in California who was among the first to draw attention to global warming. "If you have a heroin addict, the correct treatment is hospitalization, and a long reha B. But if they absolutely refuse, methadone is better than heroin. "
Basically the idea is to apply "sunscreen" to the whole planet. One astronomer has come up with a radical plan to cool Earth; launch trillions of feather-light discs into space, where they would form a vast cloud that would block the sun’s rays. It’s controversial, but recent studies suggest there are ways to deflect just enough of the sunlight reaching the Earth’s surface to counteract the warming produced by the greenhouse effect. Global climate models show that blocking just 1.8 per cent of the incident energy in the sun’s rays would cancel out the warming effects produced by a doubling of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. That could be crucial, because even the most severe emissions-control measures being proposed would leave us with a doubling of carbon dioxide by the end of this century, and that would last for at least a century more.
What is NOT true of the effectiveness of "sunscreen", according to the last paragraph?
选项
A、It deflects sunlight reaching the Earth to counteract the warming.
B、It blocks the incident energy in the sun’s rays.
C、It is a controversial method.
D、It decreases greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/n6Qd777K
本试题收录于:
职称英语理工类C级题库职称英语分类
0
职称英语理工类C级
职称英语
相关试题推荐
IsYourChild’sStomachPainAllinHisHead?Weallknowtherearetimesthatkidsseemtocomplain【C1】______astomachache
TheFirstFourMinutesWhendopeopledecidewhetherornottheywanttobecomefriends?Duringtheirfirstfourminutestog
BedwettingMillionsofkidsandteenagersfromeverypartoftheworldwetthebedeverysinglenight,it’ssocommonthat
SomeSchoolingonBackpacksAccordingtotheU.S.ConsumerProductSafetyCommission,5,900kidsweretreatedathospital
Ournewhouseisonthefirstfloor.
ClinicalTrials1Manyclinicaltrialsaredonetoseeifanewdrugordeviceissafeandeffectiveforpeopletouse.Sometime
Thequestion"Areyouamanoramouse?"reallymeanstoaskwhetheryoubelieveAccordingtothepassage,theadrenalinlevel
Wecannotgoonquarrellinglikethis.
RescuePlatformIntheaftermathoftheterroristattacksontheWorldTradeCenter,securityexpertsaretryingtodevelop
Ournewhouseisonthefirstfloor.
随机试题
“祸起萧墙”、“日薄西山”、“桃李不言,下自成蹊”等成语分别出自【】
心室肌有效不应期长短主要取决于
法院对于诉讼中有关情况的处理,下列哪些做法是正确的?
位于北京市朝阳区的某高架桥建设项目未按照环境报告书安装隔音设施便已通车,按照《环境保护法》的规定,应对其实施( )的行政处罚。
()是指应用数理统计分析的方法来选择对象。
会计职业道德教育的形式有()。
25.证券X期望收益率为0.11,贝塔值是1.5,无风险收益率为0.05,市场期望收益率为0.09。根据资本资产定价模型,这个证券( )。
在下列情况下,应选择较短流通渠道的产品是()。
茶艺是一种综合性的生活艺术,但对“茶艺”的________诠释究竟是什么,却众说纷纭,即使开茶艺馆的人,也多半________。填入划横线部分最恰当的一项是:
人均GDP越高的国家,其交通就越安全。然而,人均GDP水平相当的国家,其交通危险性的级别也可能不同。一个最惊人的例子就是比利时和荷兰。两国的人均GDP相同,两国为邻国,甚至共用一种语言,但在比利时驾车更危险。答案是:腐败程度。根据反腐败组织“透明国际”公布
最新回复
(
0
)