首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Who has never heard of King David? There are probably not too many Christians who have not heard of King David. What many Christ
Who has never heard of King David? There are probably not too many Christians who have not heard of King David. What many Christ
admin
2014-01-07
66
问题
Who has never heard of King David? There are probably not too many Christians who have not heard of King David. What many Christians probably do not realize is that, until recently, other than David’s occurrence in the Bible, there has never been actual proof that he ever existed. Over the years this has given fuel to certain groups wishing to view the Bible as a huge trip into the allegorical. However, all of this changed in 1993. Recently, your author learned for the first time what I am going to attempt to tell about here. You might think that given your faith, it doesn’t really matter whether there is proof of David or not. But think for a moment of the implications of our Bible being definitively proven by actual physical evidence. It would be like having your cake, and someone putting icing on it!!!
In 1993(as told in the March/April 1994 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review), Avraham Biran and his team of archaeologists unearthed a piece of stone with fragments of writing on it. In the writings was the words "House of David". It was the first mention of David in ancient inscription outside the Bible. The fragment was found at Tel Dan which lies by the head waters of the Jordan River, near Israel’s northern border. The large piece of basalt was part of what must have been a large monumental inscription. It contains 13 lines, but no single line is complete. The surviving letters are clear, however. Line 9 contains the words "House of David". After the complete translation, it was determined that the fragment was part of a victory stela erected in Dan by an Aramean boasting a military victory over the House of David. Many questions are raised as well as many possibilities upon comparing the fragment with the Biblical history. For instance the victory of the Aramean would conflict with the episode in the Bible. However as BAR points out, there were probably many battles and not all were recorded in the Bible. We do know that Israel must have regained control of Dan. This find would perhaps seem simple and to the point, but that is far from the truth. The find began a debate in earnest.
Immediately following the find, many came forward to state that the stone did not actually mention the "House of David." Along with this claim came the accusation that those believing that it did mention David were "Biblical Maximizers." The arguing was fast and furious. The debate inspired letters to the editors displaying the anger, emotion, and dismay from Christians. How could this new proof be denied? While the verbal debate raged, researchers and scientists quietly built a case on the very evidence the naysayers demanded. Another scholar, Andre’ Lemaire wrote an article in BAR stating that there was another mention of David in an earlier find. It was called the Mesha Stela proclaiming victory for the Moabite king Mesha over the Israelites.
Then in the Impact section of our own The State in December of last year, an article appeared proclaiming that scientists have found that the Bible is built on facts as well as faith. Many fragments have been found in the same area, all mentioning David. Finally, scholars have reached the consensus that David was real, something many of us have never doubted, even before the stelas were found. Although scholars are not ready to admit the Bible is historically true across the board, they are willing to concede that the "Bible has a sound historical core." One thing is certain, these finds don’t only have repercussions in a religious sense, they reach into many domains—political, personal faith, historical. I can’t say in learning about these finds that my faith has grown any stronger, I can say that I have a new appreciation for the Bible as an accurate historical record as well as a basis of faith.
The author is most likely to agree that
选项
A、it doesn’t really matter whether there is proof of David or not(Para. 1).
B、the stone did not actually mention the ’House of David.’(Para. 3).
C、the Bible is built on facts as well as faith(Para. 4).
D、Bible is historically true across the board(Para. 4).
答案
C
解析
原文最后一句中的historical record as well as a basis of faith表明作者认为《圣经》是以历史事实和信念为基础的,这与C的内容相同。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/n8FK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
ChristinaHudsonisgoingto______inLondon.
Thewomanwas______beforewhenexamswerecoming.
Topersuadehimisnothingbuttocastpearlsbeforeswine.Theunderlinedpartmeans______.
Paintinghasbeencontinuouslypracticedbyhumansforsome20,000years.Togetherwithotheractivities【C1】______ritualisticin
Whatisthepossiblerelationshipbetweenthespeakers?
WhenChristopherColumbuslandedonAmerica’sshores,heencounteredcopper-shinnedpeoplewhomhepromptlycalled"Indians".Cu
EveryoneneedstocommunicatewithothersinIdslife.Butitdoesn’tmeanyouarenecessarilyagoodcommunicator.Toimprovee
TheviewfromMrs.Manstey’swindowwasnotanunusualone,buttoher,atleast,itwasfullofinterestandbeauty.Mrs.Manst
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisCORRECTaboutSaturday’smatch?
Aroundoneinahundreddeathsworldwideisduetopassivesmoking,whichkillsanestimated600,000peopleayear,WorldHealth
随机试题
_____是监视各项活动以保证它们按计划进行并纠正各种重要偏差的过程。
X线片示根尖部有约豌豆大的圆形透射影,边界清楚、光滑,有骨白线围绕,中心密度均匀,最可能的诊断为
男性,65岁。陈旧性广泛前壁心肌梗死7年,活动后胸闷、心悸、气短2年,近1周出现夜间阵发性呼吸困难。体检:端坐呼吸,BP160/90mmHg,P120次/分。P2亢进,心脏各瓣膜区未闻及杂音。双肺底可闻及细湿啰音,双肺散在哮鸣音。腹平软,肝脾肋下未触及,双
当某种新的治疗方法仅能延长某病患者的寿命而不能使其彻底治愈,将出现()
患儿,女,足月新生儿,出生后10天。吃奶差,精神欠佳。脐部出现红肿、渗液。最可能的诊断是
法人纳税人转让房地产需要缴纳土地增值税时,如果房地产坐落地与其经营所在地不一致,纳税地点应选择在()的主管税务机关申报缴纳土地增值税。
人民群众满意不满意、赞成不赞成、答应不答应,是衡量公安工作的最高标准。()
登门槛术:指为了让他人同意一个通常不被接受的重大要求时,首先引诱他人同意一个很小的、易被接受的要求,然后再让其同意那项重大要求的方法。 根据上述定义,下列选项属于登门槛术的是()。
2012年9月份,全国居民消费价格总水平同比上涨1.9%。其中,城市上涨2.0%,农村上涨1.7%:食品价格上涨2.5%,非食品价格上涨1.7%;消费品价格上涨1.8%,服务项目价格上涨2.3%。1-9月全国居民平均消费价格总水平比2011年同期上涨2.8
______itornot,hisdiscoveryhascreatedastirinscientificcircles.
最新回复
(
0
)