首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What makes for a successful invasion? Often, the answer is to have better weapons than the enemy. And, as it is with people, so
What makes for a successful invasion? Often, the answer is to have better weapons than the enemy. And, as it is with people, so
admin
2009-08-13
73
问题
What makes for a successful invasion? Often, the answer is to have better weapons than the enemy. And, as it is with people, so it is with plants—at least, that is the conclusion of a paper published in Biology Letters by Naomi Cappuccino, of Carleton University, and Thor Arnason, of the University of Ottawa, both in Canada.
The phenomenon of alien species popping up unexpected parts of the world has grown over the past few decades as people and goods become more mobile and plant seeds and animal larvae have hitched along for the ride. Most such aliens blend into the ecosystem in which they arrive without too much fuss. (Indeed, many probably fail to establish themselves at all—but those failures, of course, are never noticed.) Occasionally, though, something goes bananas and starts trying to take the place over, and an invasive species is born. Dr. Cappuccino and Dr. Arnason asked themselves why.
One hypothesis is that aliens leave their predators behind. Since the predators in their new homelands are not adapted to exploit them, they are able to reproduce unchecked. That is a nice idea, but it does not explain why only certain aliens become invasive. Dr. Cappuccino and Dr. Arnason suspected this might be because native predators are sometimes "pre-adapted" to the aliens’ defences, but in other cases they are not.
To test this, they had first to establish a reliable list of invaders. That is not as easy as it sounds. As they observe, "although there are many lists of invasive species published by governmental agencies, inclusion of a given species in the lists may not be entirely free of political motivation". Instead, they polled established researchers in the field of alien species, asking each to list ten invasive species and, for comparison, ten aliens that just rubbed along quietly with their neighbours. The result was a list of 21 species widely agreed to be invasive and, for comparison, 18 non-invasive aliens.
Having established these lists, they went to the library to find out what was known about the plants’ chemistry. Their aim was to find the most prominent chemical weapon in each plant, whether that weapon was directed against insects that might want to eat the plant, bacteria and fungi that might want to infect it, or other plants that might compete for space, water, nutrients and light. Botanists know a lot about which sorts of compounds have what roles, so classifying constituent chemicals in this way was not too hard.
The researchers then compared the chemical arsenals of their aliens with those of native North American plants, to see if superior (or, at least, unusual) weaponry was the explanation for the invaders’ success. Their hypothesis was that highly invasive species would have chemical weapons not found in native plants, and which pests, parasites and other plants would therefore not have evolved any resistance to. The more benign aliens, by contrast, were predicted to have arsenals also found in at least some native species.
And so it proved. More than 40% of the invasive species had a chemical unknown to native plants, just over 10% of the non-invasive aliens had such a chemical. Moreover, when they looked at past studies on alien plants that had examined how much such plants suffer from the depredations of herbivorous insects, they found that the extent of the damage reported was significantly correlated with the number of native species with which that alien shared its principal chemical weapon.
For alien plants, then, the real secret of success—also as in human warfare—is surprise. It is not that the chemicals concerned are more toxic in any general sense (indeed, successful invaders are often rare in their own native habitats). Rather, it is that the locals just don’t see them coming.
选项
A、plant seeds are resistant to antibiotics.
B、people tend to hitch a ride.
C、there are more circulation of goods.
D、animal larvae become stronger.
答案
C
解析
本题是细节题。由题干中的关键词alien species定位至第二段。首句明确指出:过去的几十年,随着人和货物的流动日益频繁,植物种子和动物幼体也乘机“搭便车”四处播散,世界各地无意间出现了越来越多的外来物种。可见,货物流动增多是外来物种入侵的原因之一,故[C]为答案。[A]及[D]未提及,排除。这里搭便车的主体是plant seeds和animal larvae,并非people,[B]属于张冠李戴,排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/nEvO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Accordingtothespeaker,theareaofgreatestexpenditureofinvestmentfundsoccurredin______.
Wheredidthespeakerliveforfiveyears?
Whichofthefollowingstatementsistrueaccordingtowhatyouhear?
TheannualconsumptionofCoco-Colapercapitaintheregionalmarketsmentionedinthepassageranksinthefollowingorder.
TheGermancourtisfacingalegaldilemmabecausethelawhasn’tstipulatedthepunishmentof________.
Accordingtothespeaker,thefirstmodernOlympicGameswereheldasaninternationalcompetition.
Theeconomyurgesthegovernmenttotakemeasurestocountertheinflationandloweringsalaries.
WhyisJapan’sgovernmentplanningtheexpenditureof3millionyen?
A、HeisapplyingtoauniversityinEngland.B、Heisconsultingafemaleprofessor.C、HeisstudyinginaBritishuniversity.D、
WhathappenedtothefourremaininglawyersafterPatrick’sdisappearance?Whichofthefollowingimpliesacontrast?
随机试题
马斯洛的需要层次论是怎样划分的?
A.肾癌B.肾平滑肌脂肪瘤C.肾母细胞瘤D.高密度肾囊肿E.多囊肾患者影像检查中B超发现右肾有2cm大小结节,回声略高,不均匀。CT示结节内密度混杂,CT值一60~40HU不等,边缘清楚,首先应诊断为
对肾上腺皮质激素依赖的肾病综合征患者需加用
甲状腺功能亢进症(Graves病),男女之比为
假神最主要的病理机制是()
我党具有旺盛创造力的关键是()。
中国特色社会主义进入了新时代。做好新时代外交工作,首先要深刻领会党的十九大精神,正确认识当今时代潮流和国际大势。放眼世界,我们面对的是百年未有之大变局。21世纪以来,一大批新兴市场国家和发展中国家快速发展,世界多极化加速发展,国际格局日趋均衡,国际潮流大势
无限法偿和有限法偿
某商场的部门、员工和商品3个实体之间的关系如图5-4和表5-1至表5-4所示。假设每个部门有若干名员工,每种商品只能由一个部门负责销售。如果用户要求得到如表5-4所示的结果,则需要(60),并增加关系模式(61)。如果要求查询某部门负责销售的商品,则需
参照完整性规则包括更新规则、删除规则和_______规则。
最新回复
(
0
)