首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Reforming the Social Security retirement program is an issue of enormous practical importance. Yet it remains the missing piece
Reforming the Social Security retirement program is an issue of enormous practical importance. Yet it remains the missing piece
admin
2011-02-26
44
问题
Reforming the Social Security retirement program is an issue of enormous practical importance. Yet it remains the missing piece in American policy analysis. At a time when the Congress and the Administration are considering ways to reform welfare, Medicare, Medicaid, and the income tax, elected officials are still unwilling to confront the serious problems of our Social Security system. Eventually, however, its deteriorating financial condition will force major reforms. Whether those reforms are good or bad, whether they deal with the basic economic problems of the system or merely protect the solvency of existing institutional arrangements will depend in part on whether we, as economists, provide the appropriate intellectual framework for analyzing reform alternatives.
Major policy changes that affect the public at large can only happen in our democracy when there is widespread public support for the new direction of policy. In the field of economics, the views of the media, of other private-sector opinion leaders, and of politicians and their advisers, depend very much on their perception of what economists believe feasible and correct. Fundamental policy reforms in a complex area like social security also require the development of technical expertise, both in and out of government, about the options for change and their likely consequences. Fortunately, an expanding group of economists is now thinking and writing about social security reform. My remarks today greatly benefit from what they have written and from my conversations with many of them.
I began to do my research on the effects of Social Security reform nearly 25 year ago [Feldstein, 1974, 1975]. A central concept in my analysis of Social Security has been the notion of "Social Security wealth," which I defined as the present actuarial value of the Social Security benefits to which the current adult population will be entitled at age 65 [or are already entitled to if they are older than 65] minus the present actuarial value of the Social Security taxes that they will pay before reaching that age. Social Security wealth has now grown to about $11 trillion or more than 1.5 times GDP. Since this is equivalent to more than $50000 for every adult in the country, the value of Social Security wealth substantially exceeds all other assets for the vast majority of American households. In the aggregate, Social Security wealth exceeds three-fourths of all private financial wealth, as conventionally measured.
Social Security wealth is of course not real wealth but only a claim on current and future taxpayers. Instead of labeling this key magnitude "Social Security wealth," I could have called it the nation’s "Social Security liability." Like ordinary government debt, Social Security wealth has the power to crowd out private capital accumulation; and Social Security wealth will continue to grow as long as our current system remains unchanged, displacing an ever larger stock of capital.
The $11 trillion Social Security liability is three times as large as the official national debt. Although I certainly welcome the current political efforts to shrink future budget deficits, it is worth noting that, even if the traditional deficit is eliminated in the year 2002, so that the national debt is then no longer increasing, the national debt in the form of the Social Security liability is likely to increase that year by about $ 300 billion.
Looking further into the future, the aggregate Social Security liability will grow as the population expands, as it become relatively older, and as income rises. Government actuaries predict that, under existing law, the tax rate required to pay each year’s Social Security benefit will rise over the next 50 years from the present level of slightly less than 12 percent to more than 18 percent, and perhaps to as much as 23 percent.
According to the author, major policy changes can only happen in ______.
选项
A、America.
B、democratic countries.
C、a country where and when opinion upholds change.
D、all of the above.
E、none of the abov
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/nNBO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
2.ProgramCost$7,100(2007)(coverstuition.allprogrammaterials,andsomemeals)Specialpricingavailabletocompaniesspons
RetirementforMarionMarionWhiteisduetoretirenextweekfromwell-knownlocallawfirmBarney&Francis,(29)...
RetirementforMarionMarionWhiteisduetoretirenextweekfromwell-knownlocallawfirmBarney&Francis,(29)...
RetirementforMarionMarionWhiteisduetoretirenextweekfromwell-knownlocallawfirmBarney&Francis,(29)...
RetirementforMarionMarionWhiteisduetoretirenextweekfromwell-knownlocallawfirmBarney&Francis,(29)...
Questions29-40•Readtheintroductionbelowaboutacompanytrainingprogramme.•Choosethecorrectwordtofilleachg
随机试题
引起心肌炎的病毒种类较多,其中以哪种病毒最多见?()
“学在官府”主要反映了哪个时期的教育状况?其主要内容和特点是什么?
西方学者对市场营销道德的研究始于()
根据结构的重要性,将结构安全等级划分为:
1.背景材料:京沈高速公路北京到沈阳的高速路是国家的重点建设项目,其中宝坻一山海关,全长199km,为双向6车道高速公路。沥青混凝土表面为SBS改性沥青混凝土。结构为:20cm厚石灰稳定土层基层,18cm厚石灰粉煤灰稳定碎石基层,19c
下列各项中,可以增加流动资产周转天数的有()。
下列关于出版物社会效益与经济效益的关系,说法正确的是()。
操作性定义,又称操作定义,是根据可观察、可测量、可操作的特征来界定变量含义的方法。即从具体的行为、特征、指标上对变量的操作进行描述,将抽象的概念转换成可观测、可检验的项目。根据上述定义,下列属于操作性定义的是:
设A=,B=(E+A)-1(E-A),则(E+B)-1=______
Whichcodematchestheshapeorpattern?
最新回复
(
0
)