首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below. For each question 15-20, mark one le
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below. For each question 15-20, mark one le
admin
2012-12-14
63
问题
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below.
For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B, C or D) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Not long ago innovation was The Big Idea in marketing circles. Now, however, it’s hard to see the benefits of this rush to innovate. Indeed if anything, companies seem to be drawing back from innovation, not charging ahead. But just a few years ago many companies were combining a commitment to create entirely new product categories through innovative technologies working to hugely ambitious growth targets with a root-and-branch organisational overhaul designed to free up creativity and speed new product roll-outs.
The result was that as resources were shifted away from core businesses, sales and profits faltered, share prices slumped and CEOs were ousted. Now the mantra is a more conservative focus on the top brands, the top retail customers and the top markets. It’s being rewarded in many cases by healthier share prices. This sustained effort to cut long tails of smaller brands and focus marketing resource on existing leaders seems to be paying off.
So were we wrong to pinpoint innovation as key to long-term market success? Surely not. But we might have underestimated the enormous complexity of this beast. The term "innovation" may be simple enough but it spans a vast landscape, including the type and degree of innovation, marketing purpose, management process and market circumstance, not all of which are well understood.
Take "type" of innovation. Are we talking about new products only? Or new processes, new channels, underlying technologies, organisational structures and business models? When should the innovation involve a new brand? Or take "degree". Are we aiming for blue-sky inventions that will transform markets and create new categories? Or marginal tweaks in, say, formulation or packaging that give us an excuse to advertise something "New! Improved!"? Likewise, is the marketing purpose of the project to steal a march on competitors and drive incremental growth, or to update an obsolete product line and play catch-up to competitors? As one business news editorial complained, "innovation" is often just "simple proliferation of similar products". Then there’s process. What is the best way to manage this particular innovation? Is it to employ creative revolutionaries and set them free, or is disciplined risk management, requiring the careful testing and sifting of options to pick winners a better approach? In larger organisations, has senior management really made time spent in cross-functional teams a recognised element of successful career paths? What time frames (eg. payback periods) and degrees of risk is senior management comfortable with? And does the organisation have a culture that fits the chosen approach? Does it "celebrate failure", for example, or is it actually a risk-averse blame culture (despite what the CEO says in the annual report) ?
Successful innovation requires clearing two hurdles. First, it needs the right project with the right degree of innovation to fit with the right marketing purpose, the right innovation process, corporate culture and market circumstance. Second, it needs senior managers that understand the interplay between these different factors, so that rather than coming together simply by chance, they are deliberately brought together in different ways to meet different circumstances.
Clearing Hurdle Two can happen "by accident". Clearing Hurdle One requires real skill. We can all point to admirable, inspiring innovations. But how many companies can we point to and say "these people have mastered the art of innovation"? Brilliant innovation is a wonderful thing. Expert innovation management is even better and much rarer.
What is suggested in the fifth paragraph?
选项
A、The steps involved in innovation must be tackled in sequence.
B、Market forces should be a company’s primary consideration.
C、The types of innovation sought must be appropriate to a company.
D、Elements of chance should be assumed in decision-making.
答案
C
解析
由第五段第2句的“it needs the rightproject with the right degree of innovation tofit with the right marketing purpose,the rightinnovation process,corporate culture andmarket circumstance.”可知,成功的创新需要克服两个障碍,其中之一就是,需要创新的项目都须结合适当的市场目标,正确的革新进程以及公司文化和市场条件,也就是说创新的探索必须适合公司。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/nQ7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Whattypeofbusinessdothespeakersmostlikelyworkfor?
Whattypeofbusinessisthemanmostlikelycalling?
Lookatthegraphic.Whatcolorpaintwillthewomanmostlikelychoose?
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.(Thecandidatechoosesonetop
1.Practiseansweringthesequestions.PhaseOne:•Canyoutellmeaboutyourpresentjobandyourplansforthefuture?•Can
Askingquestions询问
Askingquestions查询
FinancialManagement:thefactorsinvolvedinmaintainingahealthycashflowinabusiness
Practisediscussingthistask,andthequestionswhichfollowit,withapartner:STAFFTRAININGREVIEWTheorganisationyouwor
随机试题
()测量设备的绝缘电阻时,必须先切断设备的电源。对含有较大电容的设备,必须先进行充分放电。
可以使用肠内营养的是【】
不是内翻缝合的是()。
善治脏腑湿痰的药物是
工程项目费用控制的步骤包括:①分析;②比较;③预测;④纠偏;⑤检查。其正确的顺序是()。
《建设工程施工合同》规定,提出索赔时,应有索赔事件发生时的有效证据。下列对索赔证据的要求不正确的是()。
项目各参与方沟通过程的五个要素是指沟通主体、沟通客体、沟通介体以及()。
[A]Marktheheadway[B]Celebratethelittlewins[C]Exerciseislikeaninvestment[D]Makegoodchoices[E]Cut
ResalePriceMaintenanceisthenameusedwhenaretaileriscompelledtosellatapricefixedbythemanufacturerinsteadof
It’ssummer.IntheUnitedStates,it’stheseasonofswimmingpools,barbeques,campingandroadtrips.Roadtripvacations
最新回复
(
0
)