首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below. For each question 15-20, mark one le
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below. For each question 15-20, mark one le
admin
2012-12-14
62
问题
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below.
For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B, C or D) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Not long ago innovation was The Big Idea in marketing circles. Now, however, it’s hard to see the benefits of this rush to innovate. Indeed if anything, companies seem to be drawing back from innovation, not charging ahead. But just a few years ago many companies were combining a commitment to create entirely new product categories through innovative technologies working to hugely ambitious growth targets with a root-and-branch organisational overhaul designed to free up creativity and speed new product roll-outs.
The result was that as resources were shifted away from core businesses, sales and profits faltered, share prices slumped and CEOs were ousted. Now the mantra is a more conservative focus on the top brands, the top retail customers and the top markets. It’s being rewarded in many cases by healthier share prices. This sustained effort to cut long tails of smaller brands and focus marketing resource on existing leaders seems to be paying off.
So were we wrong to pinpoint innovation as key to long-term market success? Surely not. But we might have underestimated the enormous complexity of this beast. The term "innovation" may be simple enough but it spans a vast landscape, including the type and degree of innovation, marketing purpose, management process and market circumstance, not all of which are well understood.
Take "type" of innovation. Are we talking about new products only? Or new processes, new channels, underlying technologies, organisational structures and business models? When should the innovation involve a new brand? Or take "degree". Are we aiming for blue-sky inventions that will transform markets and create new categories? Or marginal tweaks in, say, formulation or packaging that give us an excuse to advertise something "New! Improved!"? Likewise, is the marketing purpose of the project to steal a march on competitors and drive incremental growth, or to update an obsolete product line and play catch-up to competitors? As one business news editorial complained, "innovation" is often just "simple proliferation of similar products". Then there’s process. What is the best way to manage this particular innovation? Is it to employ creative revolutionaries and set them free, or is disciplined risk management, requiring the careful testing and sifting of options to pick winners a better approach? In larger organisations, has senior management really made time spent in cross-functional teams a recognised element of successful career paths? What time frames (eg. payback periods) and degrees of risk is senior management comfortable with? And does the organisation have a culture that fits the chosen approach? Does it "celebrate failure", for example, or is it actually a risk-averse blame culture (despite what the CEO says in the annual report) ?
Successful innovation requires clearing two hurdles. First, it needs the right project with the right degree of innovation to fit with the right marketing purpose, the right innovation process, corporate culture and market circumstance. Second, it needs senior managers that understand the interplay between these different factors, so that rather than coming together simply by chance, they are deliberately brought together in different ways to meet different circumstances.
Clearing Hurdle Two can happen "by accident". Clearing Hurdle One requires real skill. We can all point to admirable, inspiring innovations. But how many companies can we point to and say "these people have mastered the art of innovation"? Brilliant innovation is a wonderful thing. Expert innovation management is even better and much rarer.
What is suggested in the fifth paragraph?
选项
A、The steps involved in innovation must be tackled in sequence.
B、Market forces should be a company’s primary consideration.
C、The types of innovation sought must be appropriate to a company.
D、Elements of chance should be assumed in decision-making.
答案
C
解析
由第五段第2句的“it needs the rightproject with the right degree of innovation tofit with the right marketing purpose,the rightinnovation process,corporate culture andmarket circumstance.”可知,成功的创新需要克服两个障碍,其中之一就是,需要创新的项目都须结合适当的市场目标,正确的革新进程以及公司文化和市场条件,也就是说创新的探索必须适合公司。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/nQ7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Whattypeofbusinessisthemanmostlikelycalling?
WhattypeofbusinessisHarmonyforLess?
Whattypeofbusinessdoesthespeakermostlikelyworkfor?
A、 B、 C、 C是问去超市的路的HowcanIgetto疑问句。(A)是使用由问句中的supermarket可能联想到的groceries、含联想词错误的错误选项;对疑问词疑问句不能用YES/NO回答,(B)
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.YouhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfrOmtheth
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Whatisimportantwhenrecruitingnewstaff?Howtoattractthewell-qualifiedpeople?
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.
•Youwillheararecruitingmanagertellinghowtofindjobsontheweb.•Asyoulisten,forquestions1-12,completethenotes
•Youwillheararecruitingmanagertellinghowtofindjobsontheweb.•Asyoulisten,forquestions1-12,completethenotes
随机试题
下列选项中,属于现代社会个人品德修养的正确途径是
市场体系可简单划分为________和________。其中,商品市场包括________和________;生产要素巿场既包括________、________、________、________、________,也包括________。
“不积跬步,无以至千里;不积小流,无以成江海。”这说明()
能说明有机磷中毒及其程度的检验是
具有温和和熟腐功能的是能为万物运动和生长提供空间的是
HYFA—400×2×0.5型号电缆的读法是()。
计算机最主要的功能是处理信息,如处理数值、文字、声音、图形和图像等。()
MBA是一种高级企业管理人才,对MBA来说最重要的一点在于企业家精神,具有企业家精神的MBA是市场中的佼佼者。我国现在招收MBA的院校有50多所,有很多还宣称与国外院校合办,但大多是一些三流院校,有的连正式的教材都没有,其良莠不齐可见一斑。由此可推知(
下列属于毛泽东和邓子恢等一起制定土地革命中阶级路线和土地分配方法的是()
设φ(x)=,求φ’(x),其中a>0,b>0.
最新回复
(
0
)