首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
The US $3-million Fundamental Physics Prize is indeed an interesting experiment, as Alexander Polyakov said when he accepted thi
The US $3-million Fundamental Physics Prize is indeed an interesting experiment, as Alexander Polyakov said when he accepted thi
admin
2021-01-06
70
问题
The US $3-million Fundamental Physics Prize is indeed an interesting experiment, as Alexander Polyakov said when he accepted this year’s award in March. And it is far from the only one of its type. As a News Feature article in Nature discusses, a string of lucrative awards for researchers have joined the Nobel Prizes in recent years. Many, like the Fundamental Physics Prize, are funded from the telephone-number-sized bank accounts of Internet entrepreneurs. These benefactors have succeeded in their chosen fields, they say, and they want to use their wealth to draw attention to those who have succeeded in science.
What’s not to like? Quite a lot, according to a handful of scientists quoted in the News Feature. You cannot buy class, as the old saying goes, and these upstart entrepreneurs cannot buy their prizes the prestige of the Nobels. The new awards are an exercise in self-promotion for those behind them, say scientists. They could distort the achievement-based system of peer-review-led research. They could cement the status quo of peer-reviewed research. They do not fund peer-reviewed research. They perpetuate the myth of the lone genius.
The goals of the prize-givers seem as scattered as the criticism. Some want to shock, others to draw people into science, or to better reward those who have made their careers in research.
As Nature has pointed out before, there are some legitimate concerns about how science prizes—both new and old—are distributed. The Breakthrough Prize in Life Sciences, launched this year, takes an unrepresentative view of what the life sciences include. But the Nobel Foundation’s limit of three recipients per prize, each of whom must still be living, has long been outgrown by the collaborative nature of modern research—as will be demonstrated by the inevitable row over who is ignored when it comes to acknowledging the discovery of the Higgs boson. The Nobels were, of course, themselves set up by a very rich individual who had decided what he wanted to do with his own money. Time, rather than intention, has given them legitimacy.
As much as some scientists may complain about the new awards, two things seem clear. First, most researchers would accept such a prize if they were offered one. Second, it is surely a good thing that the money and attention come to science rather than go elsewhere. It is fair to criticize and question the mechanism—that is the culture of research, after all—but it is the prize-givers’ money to do with as they please. It is wise to take such gifts with gratitude and grace.
According to Paragraph 4, which of the following is true of the Nobels?
选项
A、Their endurance has done justice to them.
B、Their legitimacy has long been in dispute.
C、They are the most representative honor.
D、History has never cast doubt on them.
答案
A
解析
细节题。由题干提示可直接定位到第四段,该段最后一句提到,Time,rather than intention,has given them legitimacy.由此可知,是时间使得诺贝尔奖的合理性得到了认可,选项中的endurance是原文中的time的同义转述,因此,[A]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/nV1Z777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Everyhumanbeinghasuniquearrangementofskinonhisfingersandthisarrangementisunchangeable.Scientistsandexpertshav
Everyhumanbeinghasuniquearrangementofskinonhisfingersandthisarrangementisunchangeable.Scientistsandexpertshav
Theideathatpeoplemightbechosenorrejectedforjobsonthebasisoftheirgenesdisturbsmany.Such【C1】______mayhowever,
YouandyoursisterspentyourweekendatMr.andMrs.Johnson’scountryhouse.Writealettertothemto1)expressyourgrati
Valentine’sDaymaycomefromtheancientRomanfeastofLupercalia.【C1】______thefiercewolvesroamednearby,theoldRomans
Thesocialsciencesareflourishing.Asof2005,therewerealmosthalfamillionprofessionalsocialscientistsfromallfields
Thesocialsciencesareflourishing.Asof2005,therewerealmosthalfamillionprofessionalsocialscientistsfromallfields
[A]Analyzingyourowntaste[B]Beingcautiouswhenexperimenting[C]Findingamodeltofollow[D]Gettingthefinallook
TheUS$3-millionFundamentalPhysicsPrizeisindeedaninterestingexperiment,asAlexanderPolyakovsaidwhenheacceptedt
In1924America’sNationalResearchCouncilsenttwoengineerstosuperviseaseriesofexperimentsatatelephone-partsfactory
随机试题
在使用倒扣捞筒时,对钻杆施以扭矩,扭矩通过筒体上的()传给卡瓦,即可实现倒扣。
护理人员所面临的诸多人际关系中,最重要的关系是()。
氢氧化铝叙述错误的是
表热证用辛凉解表方药,里热证用清热泻火方药治疗,体现的治法是()。
辨析:无权代理中被代理人的追认权系请求权。[首师大2011年研]
建设工程质量监督机构应将()通知建设、勘察、设计、施工、监理单位。
财政性存款由中国人民银行专营,不计利息。()
小王近期正在装修新房,他计划将长8米、宽6米的客厅按下图所示分别在各边中点连线形成的四边形内铺设不同花色的瓷砖,则需要为最里侧的四边形铺设多少平方米的瓷砖?()
修改宪法的权力只能由()行使。
下列数列收敛的是[]
最新回复
(
0
)